Hi,
A lots of disagreement and argument after Pluto had been demote from "Planet" status... Let's make thing worse : may be they should consider promote the mighty Jupiter to whatever except a planet??
Many of us may know that Jupiter actually didn't orbit around the Sun (it may appear so). The Sun and Jupiter (same with the rest of object in the solar system) actually revolve, or spin, around the very center of the mass between them... this point is called "barycenter". To consider orbit around the Sun, this point need to be inside the Sun surface. So let's take a look and check does this happen to the Sun and Jupiter "relationship"??
The Formula
r1 = a x [m2 / (m1 + m2)]
r1: the mean distance from the center of the first body.
a: the mean distance between the two bodies.
m1: the mass of first body.
m2: the mass of the second body.
The Left Conrner: Our Star, The Sun
Mass: 1.988435E+30 kg
Mean Radius of Sun: 696,000 km
The Right Conrner: The Mighty Jupiter
Mass: 1.899E+27 kg
Mean Distance From Sun: 778,412,027 km
The Result
The distance to the barycenter of Sun and Jupiter from the center of Sun:
r1 = 778,412,027 x [1.899E+27 / (1.988435E+30 + 1.899E+27)] = 742,692 km
which is 742,692 - 696,000 = 46,692 km outside the surface of Sun. This mean that both Sun and Jupiter are orbiting around a point outside the surface of the Sun... so strictly speaking, Jupiter does not obrit around the Sun.
So does Jupiter still consider a planet since it didn't actually obrit around the Sun?? Hee hee
Have a nice day.
Let's make thing worse: Is Jupiter Considered a Planet???
- weixing
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 4708
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
- Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
- Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster
Let's make thing worse: Is Jupiter Considered a Planet???
Yang Weixing
"The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance."
"The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance."
-
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:21 pm
It's all relative.
With reference to a 'fixed' point in universe, the barycentre between the Sun and Jupiter can be calculated. But with reference to either body, the other is simply orbiting around the datum point. Strictly speaking, since the universe is expanding, is there a true fixed point for reference?
Makes me wonder if we were to use the mass of black holes to calculate the barycentre... where is it between 2 black holes? Note that black holes are so dense that their mass can be considered as very near infinity!
With reference to a 'fixed' point in universe, the barycentre between the Sun and Jupiter can be calculated. But with reference to either body, the other is simply orbiting around the datum point. Strictly speaking, since the universe is expanding, is there a true fixed point for reference?
Makes me wonder if we were to use the mass of black holes to calculate the barycentre... where is it between 2 black holes? Note that black holes are so dense that their mass can be considered as very near infinity!
- weixing
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 4708
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
- Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
- Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster
Hi,
This is how astronomer find giant planets or any object that is massive and cannot be seen directly near other stars... If they detect that a star is wobbling, they know that there must be something quite massive near the stars.
Anyway, I was just "finding chicken bone in chicken egg yolk"... having some fun... ha ha ha
Have a nice day.
Jupiter and Sun are actually orbiting around their barycenter (same with other object in the Solar System). If the barycenter is in the Sun itself, the object will look like it is orbiting around the Sun. Because of this, the Sun will wobble a bit.Jupiter does orbit round the sun but due to it mass the barycenter point was formed.
This is how astronomer find giant planets or any object that is massive and cannot be seen directly near other stars... If they detect that a star is wobbling, they know that there must be something quite massive near the stars.
The reference point is Jupiter and the Sun.With reference to a 'fixed' point in universe, the barycentre between the Sun and Jupiter can be calculated.
Anyway, I was just "finding chicken bone in chicken egg yolk"... having some fun... ha ha ha
Have a nice day.
Yang Weixing
"The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance."
"The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance."
Like WX said, ALL objects orbit each other. The only difference is how far away the barycenter is from the gravitational center of the individual masses. As more and more objects are discovered, we will have a range of objects orbiting the star with barycenters varying from within the star to outside of the star (30-40%?). How do we set the limit then?
[80% Steve, 20% Alfred] ------- Probability of Clear Skies = (Age of newest equipment in days) / [(Number of observers) * (Total Aperture of all telescopes present in mm)]
This barycenter is a fundemental gravitional property that applies to all objects with mass, including Earth too! Send this to IAU and they will think we are 'goondu'. This barycenter is a resultant point that constantly varies depending on the relative varying positions and masses of all objects, whether planets, moons, asteroids or comets etc.
weixing wrote:Many of us may know that Jupiter actually didn't orbit around the Sun (it may appear so). The Sun and Jupiter (same with the rest of object in the solar system) actually revolve, or spin, around the very center of the mass between them... this point is called "barycenter".
Yes I know, but you are contradicting yourself.weixing wrote:So does Jupiter still consider a planet since it didn't actually obrit around the Sun?? Hee hee
Wrong. Weixing didn’t say that too. ALL objects, including Earth, are actually orbiting their centre of mass called the barycentre and not each other.Tachyon wrote:Like WX said, ALL objects orbit each other
It’s not so much about the barycentre, but more on the mass of the two objects in orbit. We can take Earth and throw it right into Pluto’s orbit, but its barycentre will still remain within the Sun’s surface. Consider this scenario, if we were to blow up Earth to several billion times its own mass such that it becomes larger than the Sun, the barycentre will shift towards Earth instead and the Sun will ‘appear to orbit’ around Earth. To visualize how mass can have an impact, look at the animation in the following link:Tachyon wrote:The only difference is how far away the barycenter is from the gravitational center of the individual masses
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barycentre#Barycenter
Yeap, you are right..rlow wrote:This barycenter is a fundemental gravitional property that applies to all objects with mass, including Earth too! Send this to IAU and they will think we are 'goondu'.
Cheers,
- ALPiNe
.- .-.. .--. .. -. .