thank you for sharing your wisdom. ha ha indeedClifford60 wrote:那你是不知咯，因为你根本没法子拿出数据来证明你的理论是百分之一百对的哦，所以还是劝你不要自作聪明哦，笨是没有药医的哦，少说一句也不会死的哦，哈哈哈
i concede defeat in the face your regal intelligence
pls help beg the admin/mod not to ban me. please...
kingkong wrote:it looks like many thinks that the mod/admin have been unreasonable or simply has no right to discourage unscientific claims in singastro. so i must come in to say again, this is an astronomy forum, where science - in facts & in methods are important. the "standard practices" observed in other forms might not be applicable/acceptable here because this should be more than just a "hobby" forum.
by accepting unscientific claims and propositions as "fair enough" in a forum like this will reflect very badly on its members and the society that its members are drawn from. if one is to make an assumption on the reasons why croys left, one only has to recall his own words that he's thinking of leaving because of the prevailing "scientific illiteracy". (sorry, there is no more reference to support that, so if you want to assert that croys didn't say that, it's just your words against mine )
if you think being called voodoo-science in singlish hurts, perhaps you should try propagating the same bs in bigger, renown astronomy forums (like CN, perhaps?) and see what kind of responses you will get from them. you should not be surprised that the angmohs' tolerance for bs is much much lower than asians, and sinkabolians in general, and they don't pull their punches.
again, feel free to prove me wrong.
my apologies to you and others offended by my myglish spelling of singapore.milnek wrote:Kingkong, i do agreed with you on all those you had mentioned. However, with due respect, the word highlighted below should be correctly spelled as Singaporean and not in the way you had spell them.