I was saving up for the 5D Mk II when I chanced upon this:
Click here (Click on "Low-light ISO" to see ratings)
Anyone tried D700 before on dark skies? The price of D700 is slightly cheaper than 5D Mk II.
I have lenses for both Canon and Nikon so either one is not an issue for me.
Hmm....
Canon 5D Mk II vs Nikon D700?
Canon 5D Mk II vs Nikon D700?
[80% Steve, 20% Alfred] ------- Probability of Clear Skies = (Age of newest equipment in days) / [(Number of observers) * (Total Aperture of all telescopes present in mm)]
Re: Canon 5D Mk II vs Nikon D700?
I was also in the same boat until I read Christain Buil assesment click here
his conclusion I quote
"Today the Canon and Pentax cameras seem to be the only ones useable digital SLR for efficient and advanced astronomy"
Nikon eats stars!
BTW for the 5DM2 the movie mode in HDD opens a new possibilities for astrophotography
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBOA1uK9cNM
click watch in HD
cheers
his conclusion I quote
"Today the Canon and Pentax cameras seem to be the only ones useable digital SLR for efficient and advanced astronomy"
Nikon eats stars!
BTW for the 5DM2 the movie mode in HDD opens a new possibilities for astrophotography
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBOA1uK9cNM
click watch in HD
cheers
- swat_pup6433
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 2:16 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 8:20 am
Yes, but apparently so does a few other Canon cameras. So far consensus has been that it's a processing problem and only occurs at higher ISOs. Therefore, if using RAW and limiting to a lower ISO value may help.shadowless wrote:5DII have black dots problems:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0812/08121 ... 5ddots.asp
D700 also has a banding problem that may have something to do with bright light sources.
So they're even, I guess...
[80% Steve, 20% Alfred] ------- Probability of Clear Skies = (Age of newest equipment in days) / [(Number of observers) * (Total Aperture of all telescopes present in mm)]
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 8:20 am
http://www.kenrockwell.com/canon/slrs/5 ... pixels.htm
check this one, don't think 400 is high iso, definitely not a low light shot.
check this one, don't think 400 is high iso, definitely not a low light shot.