Thanks for your sharing Mr Chia. You mentioned -
[[As for me I discovered that the optimal aperture is between 90mm to 100mm. Have you try stepping down the aperture
to say 100mm during turbulent atmospheric conditions? I did that and it works.....at 540nm......wonder if it works at Ha.
Of course there is some sacrifice in theoretical resolution]]
For the last 4 years I have been working on 75 to 100 mm aperture with relatively good results. Then I stepped up to 150mm.
I discovered that it is crucial to have an ERF up front to filter off the undesired elements to obtain a steady image for larger aperture.
I have done this for both H-Alpha and WL, though I do less of WL imaging.
My next step is to move to even larger aperture. I am looking at doing both HA and WL imaging with a C14. Budget is my main
constraint Will share it if I can get the project going.
Alfred
Frankenscope Images and Images from Eclipse 9 Mar 16
- yltansg
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:35 pm
- Favourite scope: Borg 76 + Solar Scope SF50
- Location: Bukit Batok
Re: Frankenscope Images and Images from Eclipse 9 Mar 16
Images taken on 2 Apr 16
Re: Frankenscope Images and Images from Eclipse 9 Mar 16
Fantastic HR images you had there.
- yltansg
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:35 pm
- Favourite scope: Borg 76 + Solar Scope SF50
- Location: Bukit Batok
Re: Frankenscope Images and Images from Eclipse 9 Mar 16
Thanks Lee. I still need to work on how to get spot-on focus, on-band tuning and how to bring out the high frequency component in the image.
Alfred
Alfred
- yltansg
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:35 pm
- Favourite scope: Borg 76 + Solar Scope SF50
- Location: Bukit Batok
Re: Frankenscope Images and Images from Eclipse 9 Mar 16
9 Mar 16 - This new sunspot brought low-intensity flares with it. It was about 5-6 the size of Earth's diameter when I caught it. It has grown alot bigger since.
- yltansg
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:35 pm
- Favourite scope: Borg 76 + Solar Scope SF50
- Location: Bukit Batok
Re: Frankenscope Images and Images from Eclipse 9 Mar 16
30 Apr collection
Re: Frankenscope Images and Images from Eclipse 9 Mar 16
Super excellent Solar images Alfred, i had just started into Solar & wish to consult you what are the brighten patches of lights on Sun surface that you had captured on 30 Apr 2016, are they Chromosphere Flare or to be classified as Solar Flare in general ? Thanks.
- yltansg
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:35 pm
- Favourite scope: Borg 76 + Solar Scope SF50
- Location: Bukit Batok
Re: Frankenscope Images and Images from Eclipse 9 Mar 16
Hi Peter,
Welcome to the interesting world of solar imaging. The Sun is changing every moment and you wouldn't be disappointed.
I usually counter check what I see on the Sun with websites such as these to confirm if the Sun was flaring:
http://www.tesis.lebedev.ru/en/sun_flares.html
http://www.solarham.net/
Generally the white patches are within the active regions. http://solar.physics.montana.edu/canfie ... A.2023.pdf
White patches can be signs of flaring. I believe some of those you saw in my images were very low level flares (below C-class flares)
Here are some more images from yesterday's imaging session:
Welcome to the interesting world of solar imaging. The Sun is changing every moment and you wouldn't be disappointed.
I usually counter check what I see on the Sun with websites such as these to confirm if the Sun was flaring:
http://www.tesis.lebedev.ru/en/sun_flares.html
http://www.solarham.net/
Generally the white patches are within the active regions. http://solar.physics.montana.edu/canfie ... A.2023.pdf
White patches can be signs of flaring. I believe some of those you saw in my images were very low level flares (below C-class flares)
Here are some more images from yesterday's imaging session:
Re: Frankenscope Images and Images from Eclipse 9 Mar 16
Thanks Alfred for the information & links, i am starting out with a small unit, Coronado PST, quite a lot of fun though ..
Re: Frankenscope Images and Images from Eclipse 9 Mar 16
Hi Alfred, with reference to your 30 Apr Collections of Solar images, while the first two of them i can figure out are Hydrogen Alpha & Calcium K images i think, the last two close up views are they taken with Hydrogen Alpha also ? Looks like requiring very large Etalon unit and tight specifications to do the job ? Are the pictures Close up view of Active region ? thanks