hi stuart,
1) I did a horrific amount of stretching, hence all the noise.
Took too few subs (got bored with the mandatory DFS).
Anyway it's still "success" for me as I've never done this before, have to start somewhere..
2) did not know the K-x has mandatory DFS > 30 seconds
the K20 has mandatory DFS > 0.3 seconds! :-(
Got this from Pentax Forum:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pent ... phy-2.html
the M31 in that thread is as much as I can hope for :-) 55x 30s with K-x. I can live with that..
3) I knew I should've stopped down the macro lens.. but as usual got lazy (it was around 4:30 a.m. already at the time.. and the sand flies were murdering me)
4) I also see that the coma is uneven over the field of the WO70. I believe the sensor is not square to the tube (probably the fault of my cheapo T-mount, since the WO focuser is quite beefy). The K20D is quite heavy.
5) I was thinking of using the Orion reducer on my Orion f/9 scope :-) and use the WO70 as a guider (I already tried that before with a Toucam and it worked great). Although both of my shots above were unguided, seems if I stick with 30-second subs I should be OK...
having a K-x would also ensure that i (still) have a camera when my wife wants to go bug-hunting (which is the reason i have a 100mm macro!)
Punggai Trip Astrophotography (7 - 9 Aug 2010)
- orly_andico
- Posts: 1616
- Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:14 pm
- Location: Braddell Heights
- Contact:
- cloud_cover
- Posts: 1170
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:08 pm
- Favourite scope: 94.5", f/24 Ritchey-Chretien Reflector
- Location: Restaurant At the End of the Universe
Quickie :)
A quick run with DSS on my laptop, no further editing done except conversion to jpg in Photoshop elements (trial)
M6 and M7 cluster
Nikon D700, 70-200mmVR2 with TC20E-3, 140mm, f8.0, ISO 12500
On non-tracking photo tripod.
68 x 2 sec subs
140mm was a mistake: Intended to zoom to 400mm but in the darkness didn't notice the zoom was at 70mm instead of 200mm!
M6 and M7 cluster
Nikon D700, 70-200mmVR2 with TC20E-3, 140mm, f8.0, ISO 12500
On non-tracking photo tripod.
68 x 2 sec subs
140mm was a mistake: Intended to zoom to 400mm but in the darkness didn't notice the zoom was at 70mm instead of 200mm!
- cloud_cover
- Posts: 1170
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:08 pm
- Favourite scope: 94.5", f/24 Ritchey-Chretien Reflector
- Location: Restaurant At the End of the Universe
- orly_andico
- Posts: 1616
- Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:14 pm
- Location: Braddell Heights
- Contact:
much better!!! this is a very good effort if I may say so myself...
this goes to show... more subs! although given the # of subs you've taken (almost 30 minutes total!) the image should be Hubble-like already :-D
more processing will probably make Hubble come out..!
also something to note... the Vixen GP was not polar aligned at all ("eye ball aligned") but the stars are still round. so auto-guiding is not absolutely necessary. I suspect an even simpler mount would still do, makes a good grab-and-go imaging rig.
this goes to show... more subs! although given the # of subs you've taken (almost 30 minutes total!) the image should be Hubble-like already :-D
more processing will probably make Hubble come out..!
also something to note... the Vixen GP was not polar aligned at all ("eye ball aligned") but the stars are still round. so auto-guiding is not absolutely necessary. I suspect an even simpler mount would still do, makes a good grab-and-go imaging rig.
- cloud_cover
- Posts: 1170
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:08 pm
- Favourite scope: 94.5", f/24 Ritchey-Chretien Reflector
- Location: Restaurant At the End of the Universe
- orly_andico
- Posts: 1616
- Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:14 pm
- Location: Braddell Heights
- Contact: