WO 10th Anniversary Scope

Here is the place to talk about all those equipment(Telescope, Mounts, Eyepieces, etc...) you have. Not sure which scope/eyepiece is best for you? Trash it out here!
User avatar
jermng
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 7:09 am

Post by jermng »

Argh .. if you guys noticed ..the past 3 nights were really clear ... except for some turbulence and twinkling stars ..There were very few clouds and I could actually see constellations while casually walking ...
Today .... rain rain rain .... can't even see full moon ... Weixing!!!!

Cheers!
Jeremy
User avatar
kayheem
Posts: 1038
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 9:59 am
Location: Sennet Estate

Post by kayheem »

It rained so hard that the drains in front of my house was threatening to overflow!
OK, if anyone is going to order a scope or expensive accessory, please co-operate by having it delivered during full moon and NOT during special occasions e.g. Mars Watch, comet viewing etc. OK? :D

Kay Heem
User avatar
starfinder
Posts: 1039
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: River Valley / Tanglin Road
Contact:

Post by starfinder »

The scope's fit and finish looks fabulous!

Now there are so many 80mm-class APO scopes on the market (even WO has about 3 APO models in the 80mm range), we are spoilt for choice. But that makes deciding which one rather difficult.

For starters, apart from price, portability issues, etc, anyone knows how the colour correction on the following scopes compare with each other?

1. WO Zenithstar 80mm Fluorite Doublet APO (this one).

2. WO Megrez 80 II ED Triplet APO, which was just sold by Arief

3. WO Megrez 80 triplet fluorite APO

4. Celestron C80ED / Orion ED80 / Skywatcher Pro 80ED (all use the same "ED" doublet lens set, with one element said to be made of fluorite).

5. Televue 85mm

6. Takahashi FS-78 / FC-76 (fluorite doublets)
anat
Posts: 479
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Bangkok

Post by anat »

It becomes hot discussions in
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/ ... /fpart/all

The 80 ED triplet shows blue halo around stars photographically (from the link above). I wonder why there is very few information on astrophotographic perfermance of WO 80 mm scopes.

Anat
User avatar
Tachyon
Posts: 2038
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 11:40 am
Location: Bedok

Post by Tachyon »

anat wrote:I wonder why there is very few information on astrophotographic perfermance of WO 80 mm scopes.
Probably because most people (like me) who bought it use it mainly for visual. If I bother to set up my photographic equipment, I want to make sure that the scope is something at least 4", refractor or not.

Cheers!
[80% Steve, 20% Alfred] ------- Probability of Clear Skies = (Age of newest equipment in days) / [(Number of observers) * (Total Aperture of all telescopes present in mm)]
User avatar
ariefm71
Posts: 2304
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:15 pm
Location: bedok

Post by ariefm71 »

It becomes hot discussions in
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/ ... /fpart/all

The 80 ED triplet shows blue halo around stars photographically (from the link above). I wonder why there is very few information on astrophotographic perfermance of WO 80 mm scopes.

Anat
I think it depends on whether you're using the old ED triplet lens or the newer one (William told me when he sent the lens upgrade that this one will be significantly better in term of color correction than the older lens)

Btw, from the above list, the color correction will be like this (1 is best) - (this is my opinion only, do your own research):
1. WO Megrez 80 triplet fluorite APO
2. Takahashi FS-78 / FC-76 (fluorite doublets)
3. The rest - tie
User avatar
weixing
Super Moderator
Posts: 4708
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster

Post by weixing »

Hi,
Probably because most people (like me) who bought it use it mainly for visual. If I bother to set up my photographic equipment, I want to make sure that the scope is something at least 4", refractor or not.
If can, everyone will want to use a big scope for imaging, but sometime you just can't use a big scope, especially if you want to take wide field object... because the longer the focal length the smaller the FoV.

Have a nice day.
Yang Weixing
:mrgreen: "The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance." :mrgreen:
User avatar
denebman
Posts: 461
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 4:40 pm
Location: Clementi

Post by denebman »

agree with Arief.
10" Telekit with Zambuto optics~TMB 152/1200 (construction)~Takashi Mewlon 210~TMB 80/600
anat
Posts: 479
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Bangkok

Post by anat »

Thank you for the comments. Curiously wating for the review of the 80 ZSFD. :)

Anat
User avatar
Tachyon
Posts: 2038
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 11:40 am
Location: Bedok

Post by Tachyon »

weixing wrote:If can, everyone will want to use a big scope for imaging, but sometime you just can't use a big scope, especially if you want to take wide field object... because the longer the focal length the smaller the FoV.
Which reminds me... I'm eyeing the 120mm F/5: Large aperture + shorter focal length. That'll be for photography...although not APO. Also I have been corrected in another Forum that WO did NOT list the 10th Anniversary Scope as APO!

120mm F/5: Here
[80% Steve, 20% Alfred] ------- Probability of Clear Skies = (Age of newest equipment in days) / [(Number of observers) * (Total Aperture of all telescopes present in mm)]
Post Reply