First attempt at LRGB

CCD vs Film? Lots of time vs no patience? Alright, this is your place to discuss all the astrophotography what's and what's not. You can discuss about techniques, accessories, cameras, whatever....just make sure you also post some nice photos here too!
User avatar
mch3898
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 12:30 am

First attempt at LRGB

Post by mch3898 »

Hi,

This is my first attempt at getting a LRGB done. This shot of the Lagoon Nebula was done over two nights using Meade DSI Pro III through the WO Meg 90. The lum was with a Ha filter and a stack of 3 one-min subs. The RGB are also stacks of one-minute subs.

The LRGB seemed to loose some of the nebulosity of the luminance image.

Image

Image
christopher
User avatar
Chris
Posts: 151
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 11:24 pm

Post by Chris »

Nice, the pictures are urging me to get a DSI too, can see quite a lot of details... You took that in sg?
guangwei
Posts: 373
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: singapore

Post by guangwei »

excellent!!
User avatar
Gary
Posts: 3790
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 7:06 am
Location: Toa Payoh
Contact:

Post by Gary »

Nice! Thanks for sharing.
User avatar
mch3898
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 12:30 am

Post by mch3898 »

Chris wrote:Nice, the pictures are urging me to get a DSI too, can see quite a lot of details... You took that in sg?
Thanks. The Ha filter helps tremendously. Yes, the images were all captured from my place in Bishan area, with street lights all over.
christopher
User avatar
Clifford60
Posts: 1289
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:41 pm
Location: Central

Post by Clifford60 »

great job
User avatar
timatworksg
Posts: 767
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:42 pm
Location: Pasir Ris

Post by timatworksg »

Hi Chris,

Excellent! Great shot! Must go to your place and AP one night!!
Overall....great work with the LRGB. Your good at it! Keep it up!!

Tim
My wife never complained about how much time, effort & money I spent on my Astronomy hobby!................suddenly I met her!!!
User avatar
cataclysm
Posts: 1024
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:23 pm

Post by cataclysm »

Hi nice attempt! Try for longer exposures, and with longer integration time, the image will improve a great deal. [smilie=good-job.gif]
User avatar
wucheeyiun
Posts: 1758
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: marine parade
Contact:

Post by wucheeyiun »

very nice ... [smilie=admire.gif]
User avatar
mch3898
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 12:30 am

Post by mch3898 »

cataclysm wrote:Hi nice attempt! Try for longer exposures, and with longer integration time, the image will improve a great deal. [smilie=good-job.gif]
@Cataclysm

Thanks. I tried longer exposure of 5 mins but get a completely over-exposed pic. Even at 2 mins, there is some over-exposure. Are there any tweakings that can be done to have long exposure but still get good subs? Will like to learn from your experience.

Yeah I try to get longer integration time but sometime the clouds do not co-operate. Like I shared in an earlier posting, the lum was from 3 good subs out of 25 one-min subs. These three were probably from timely respite created in the gaps between clouds. The rest were not usable at all.
christopher
Post Reply