SingAstro

Junwei, I was considering the 120 over 150 because not only it's cheaper but also less CA, but the length set me back since it means a dry-cab 2 size up.

Kochu, are you able to show me a untouch photo of the moon with the scope without filter? While I hear all about the CA, I really don't have a feel how bad it is.

Bomia wrote:Hi hardware zone, The reason why I am not getting 6se, it is not EQ mount and I like to consider AP in near future. And can teach me how to use US proxy?

google search "facebook proxy"
the first page results just pick one that doesn't look too dubious , be sure to not key in personal info with these proxy
https://www.proxfree.com/facebook-proxy.php

The celestron omni cg4 mount (also called skywatcher eq3-2) , I think you may need to get more info on it because I've seen comments in other forum that it is inadequate(gears and bearings) for anything but the brightest targets.... and also the counterweight & pier issue for our local 1degree north latitude



this CA chart pops up at the usual forums .... don't know created by who

for more info you can google search "sidgwick focal ratio"

Hi Bomia,

Speaking from Visual p.o.v : I think you should try looking through some achromats to decide on your acceptable level of CA . Different people have different limits. Myself Im not bothered with the false colour as I could only see it on 1 target : Jupiter at med-high power during the mersing trip. During the trip there were alot of first timers coming on second night and I asked if any of them saw any blue fringing on various objects : Nil. Locally i tried it on moon with also almost undetectable CA.

No one single scope suits all purposes , honest truth about this hobby. After some time, you can also decide if you are inclined to go down the visual observing route or the digital Imaging route. Hope this helps.

Regards,
Junwei

Just to clarify, Junwei is using a good quality 100mm achromat at a good f10. His observation that there is negligible CA is consistent with the chart posted by Hardwarezone.

Hardwarezone wrote:

Bomia wrote:Hi hardware zone, The reason why I am not getting 6se, it is not EQ mount and I like to consider AP in near future. And can teach me how to use US proxy?

google search "facebook proxy"
the first page results just pick one that doesn't look too dubious , be sure to not key in personal info with these proxy
https://www.proxfree.com/facebook-proxy.php

The celestron omni cg4 mount (also called skywatcher eq3-2) , I think you may need to get more info on it because I've seen comments in other forum that it is inadequate(gears and bearings) for anything but the brightest targets.... and also the counterweight & pier issue for our local 1degree north latitude

All GEMs should have the pier issue when used in Singapore unless it comes with a half-pier or you buy one together when purchasing the GEM. I'm currently in the process of researching if I want to build one out of pvc (seen others do it before, so I'm tempted).

I'm actually using the Celestron Omni CG-4 but my scope + dslr comes up to under 3kg so that's perfectly fine, although the CG-4 does have a rated limitation of only 20 pounds so heavier scopes/gear may not be suitable. Tripod legs are single-piece metal so it's plenty sturdy (and heavy....). So far, using it with the dual-axis motor (although I'm only using the RA-drive), 60 seconds seem to be okay on my Astrotech AT66ED - haven't tried longer exposures.

Sivakis, if you are using PVC, try to find ABS plastic pipe, it's thicker and stronger.

Hi Bomia,
Inspite of false colours and such, in Astronomy, Aperture wins. If you are seriously into astronomy, you will graduate from Planets and moon very quickly. And DSOs require more aperture, especially in Singapore where they are dimmer. Get the biggest aperture that you can easily carry around (Cats or Newts). The Skywatcher Heritage 130 would be a good starter although its not suitable for AP. You can always buy a EQ mount later for the OTA.

Refractors offers typically 3 advantages, wide view, portability and high contrast. But generally, when viewing DSOs, they do not matter as much.

And before you buy anything, do drop by any of the obs sessions to check out the scopes there, so you have a better idea what is needed.

Cheers

Hi JunWei, I am actually seriously considering the 150R pairing with AVX mount as my first scope after reading all the comments and other acticles. My plan next will likely be a 6" Newtonian or 8" SCT to cover the whole sky. I guess I should be able to accept the CA as a imperfection of the refractor. Nothing is perfect in the first place.
I am prepared to the scope home next week and will very wish to join you guys in some gathering.

Bomia wrote:Sivakis, if you are using PVC, try to find ABS plastic pipe, it's thicker and stronger.

Thanks Bomia I'll take note of that.

Hi Bomia,

150mm refractor (in your case the achro which is a f5...I think) and a 6in newt f5 seems to be overlapping . unless if you are getting a ISTAR 6" achro f10 or f15 please invite me to admire the scope ;)

Sure! we are also waiting for more suitable weather on weekends...because of work and family..past few nights have been totally overcast, till tonight it clears but its monday tmr...

Regards,
junwei