Are you sure the bulk and weight is gonna worth the trouble?siahheng wrote:I too am toying with the idea of an Obsession scope!!
For big dobs, they have increased light gathering capabilites but also bring in more light pollution and the view in Singapore will not be much better. Can you guys tell me if this is true.
And, I would like to peek into a 12 inch or bigger dob if there is any around. Thanks.
Siah Heng
Anyone owns a 12" or larger DOB?
Someone told me that bigger dobs will bring in not only the light form the DSOs but Singapore's light pollution as well and the DSOs will still be difficult to see.VinSnr wrote:Are you sure the bulk and weight is gonna worth the trouble?siahheng wrote:I too am toying with the idea of an Obsession scope!!
For big dobs, they have increased light gathering capabilites but also bring in more light pollution and the view in Singapore will not be much better. Can you guys tell me if this is true.
And, I would like to peek into a 12 inch or bigger dob if there is any around. Thanks.
Siah Heng
Is this true?
- Canopus Lim
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:46 pm
- Location: Macpherson
Well with Singapore increasing light pollution, I don't think we will be using scopes much for DSO (except the brigther ones). So might as well get a larger scope for Mersing or darker skies since we can only use scopes to see planets or moon well in Singapore; and probably we need to travel more to Mersing since Singapore skies are getting 'suckier'. But the 18inch requires a hatchback car that is for sure. Many small cars (1.6 litre and below) are sedan so that is a problem. Also, if a cab is needed, the 18inch cannot fit into it.
AstroDuck
Not light pollution, but I have read arguments for/against larger apertures being more sensitive to bad seeing.
The problem with light pollution is contrast - leading to decreased signal-to-noise ratio of the DSO object you are trying to observe. While a larger scope will gather more light from the object, it will also proportionately gather more light pollution. However, larger apertures will increase the amount of light gathered from the DSO, and thus increase the signal - hence the ability to see the object. Note that the contrast is not improved and you will not see the magnificant details as compared to a dark site.
Cheers!
The problem with light pollution is contrast - leading to decreased signal-to-noise ratio of the DSO object you are trying to observe. While a larger scope will gather more light from the object, it will also proportionately gather more light pollution. However, larger apertures will increase the amount of light gathered from the DSO, and thus increase the signal - hence the ability to see the object. Note that the contrast is not improved and you will not see the magnificant details as compared to a dark site.
Cheers!
[80% Steve, 20% Alfred] ------- Probability of Clear Skies = (Age of newest equipment in days) / [(Number of observers) * (Total Aperture of all telescopes present in mm)]
- acc
- Administrator
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 11:15 pm
- Favourite scope: Mag1 Instruments 12.5" Portaball
A large aperture helps to some extent in Singapore. For example, during an observing session at Dempsey, the hat shape of M104 is easily discernible in the 8" Portaball, while a 10" dob nearby shows a slightly better defined dust-lane. This same object would be practically invisible in a 70mm scope in Sg. 

We do it in the dark...
Portaball 12.5"
Takahashi Mewlon 210
William Optics 110ED
...and all night long!
Portaball 12.5"
Takahashi Mewlon 210
William Optics 110ED
...and all night long!
- weixing
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 4708
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
- Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
- Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster
Hi,
I think there may be some true on this and I think this will only happen at low magnification when the seeing and transparency is not that good.
My experience so far with this is that at low magnification the light pollution through my 120 refractor seen more serious than through my 9x50 finder scope.... and I think the view will be even worse if I'm able to use 9x on my refractor...
Anyway, may be next time acc can bring out his 12.5" to test with other smaller scope...

Have a nice day.
PS: So when are you resuming the CSN???
I think there may be some true on this and I think this will only happen at low magnification when the seeing and transparency is not that good.
My experience so far with this is that at low magnification the light pollution through my 120 refractor seen more serious than through my 9x50 finder scope.... and I think the view will be even worse if I'm able to use 9x on my refractor...
Anyway, may be next time acc can bring out his 12.5" to test with other smaller scope...


Have a nice day.
PS: So when are you resuming the CSN???
Yang Weixing
"The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance." 


- acc
- Administrator
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 11:15 pm
- Favourite scope: Mag1 Instruments 12.5" Portaball
My Portaball just arrived yesterdayweixing wrote:Hi,
I think there may be some true on this and I think this will only happen at low magnification when the seeing and transparency is not that good.
My experience so far with this is that at low magnification the light pollution through my 120 refractor seen more serious than through my 9x50 finder scope.... and I think the view will be even worse if I'm able to use 9x on my refractor...
Anyway, may be next time acc can bring out his 12.5" to test with other smaller scope...![]()
Have a nice day.
PS: So when are you resuming the CSN???


We do it in the dark...
Portaball 12.5"
Takahashi Mewlon 210
William Optics 110ED
...and all night long!
Portaball 12.5"
Takahashi Mewlon 210
William Optics 110ED
...and all night long!