Congrats, Vincent!
What is her name?
Now everyone will want a side-by-side comparison of our Portaball, Obsession, and Astrosky!
Just say when...
Cheers!
VinSnr 11" f/5!
err ok..thanks.....but how come u all seems to be more excited than me huh? hehe. Maybe I think I waited for this until sian liow.....almost coming to 10 months already. Almost forgotten I got a scope in US.Tachyon wrote:Congrats, Vincent!
What is her name?
Now everyone will want a side-by-side comparison of our Portaball, Obsession, and Astrosky!
Just say when...
Cheers!
I am actually more curious on how that Sky commander work.
- Airconvent
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 5803
- Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:49 pm
- Location: United Federation of the Planets
wah...so it really is Vincent Senior's scope!
BTW, can I request that as much as possible, all DIY'ers do upload the design plans for their scopes so that it can be shared with other beginners as well...
For dobs, I think the key consideration is balance, I think...
BTW, can I request that as much as possible, all DIY'ers do upload the design plans for their scopes so that it can be shared with other beginners as well...
For dobs, I think the key consideration is balance, I think...
The Boldly Go Where No Meade Has Gone Before
Captain, RSS Enterprise NCC1701R
United Federation of the Planets
Captain, RSS Enterprise NCC1701R
United Federation of the Planets
I have given Astrosky the maximum weight I will use on the focuser before he did the "balancing". I weigh most of my eyepieces and then I give him the heavist and the lightest one. This way, he got a range to work with.Airconvent wrote:wah...so it really is Vincent Senior's scope!
BTW, can I request that as much as possible, all DIY'ers do upload the design plans for their scopes so that it can be shared with other beginners as well...
For dobs, I think the key consideration is balance, I think...
In any event, if the front become too heavy, just get some magnetic weights and put behind.
- Canopus Lim
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:46 pm
- Location: Macpherson
The best is to have sliding weights to give accurate balancing. To balance a scope, it has to be back heavy enough and not too heavy also. When removing the heaviest eyepiece, the scope should not tilt up due to the change in balance and also when with the heavy eyepiece, the scope should not tilt down. I did balancing on my scope and found that there is a minimum altitute the scope can be tilted to satisfy this two condition; above or at that altitude the scope will not have balance issues. It is not possible to take out the heaviest eyepiece when the scope is pointing horizontal, as the back will be too heavy. Therefore, it will be good if there is a sliding weight.
AstroDuck
Yeah..sliding weights will be good.Canopus Lim wrote:The best is to have sliding weights to give accurate balancing. To balance a scope, it has to be back heavy enough and not too heavy also. When removing the heaviest eyepiece, the scope should not tilt up due to the change in balance and also when with the heavy eyepiece, the scope should not tilt down. I did balancing on my scope and found that there is a minimum altitute the scope can be tilted to satisfy this two condition; above or at that altitude the scope will not have balance issues. It is not possible to take out the heaviest eyepiece when the scope is pointing horizontal, as the back will be too heavy. Therefore, it will be good if there is a sliding weight.