meade DSI

CCD vs Film? Lots of time vs no patience? Alright, this is your place to discuss all the astrophotography what's and what's not. You can discuss about techniques, accessories, cameras, whatever....just make sure you also post some nice photos here too!
User avatar
Meng Lee
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:36 pm
Location: NTU, Woodlands

Post by Meng Lee »

At the left hand side of the Envisage software is the 16bit Histogram, make sure it does not crowd all the way to the right, that means overexpose and lose data. no amount of processing will recover.

I remember you can drag a box around the planet and the software will stack as it is taking pics. Better not use that. Take individual 16bit tiff and stack them in Registax will be better. Take about 600.
User avatar
Meng Lee
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:36 pm
Location: NTU, Woodlands

Post by Meng Lee »

Forget to add that, since you are in Az configuration, then don't take so many pics, otherwise field rotation will blur the pics when you stack them together.

Calculate the field rotation amount. I am not sure if its large enough to cause bluring.
User avatar
mrngbss
Posts: 900
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 8:27 am
Location: Bishan
Contact:

Post by mrngbss »

Meng Lee wrote:
Calculate the field rotation amount. I am not sure if its large enough to cause bluring.
How to calculate field rotation amount?
Wee Nghee the Pooh
User avatar
Meng Lee
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:36 pm
Location: NTU, Woodlands

Post by Meng Lee »

you can try the mathematics here:

http://www.stargazing.net/yizen/fieldrotation.html
User avatar
mrngbss
Posts: 900
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 8:27 am
Location: Bishan
Contact:

Post by mrngbss »

Hmmm.. deep... very deep....
Wee Nghee the Pooh
User avatar
Meng Lee
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:36 pm
Location: NTU, Woodlands

Post by Meng Lee »

mostly because the altazimuth axes of the mount has to be considered.
tungkian
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:14 am

Post by tungkian »

ok..i've tried remus' and weixing's suggestions. lowered the gain, contrast and stuff. used the meade envisage software to take multi .bmp files only and stacked them in registax v4.

it's a better 2nd attempt although i think the focusing could have been better. needa touch up somemore with photoshop as well..

it's a stack of 279 frames...is it a bug wif registax? cause i took around 540 frames but registax only detected 279 despite me selecting all the 540...hmm..weird..
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
weixing
Super Moderator
Posts: 4708
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster

Post by weixing »

Hi,
it's a stack of 279 frames...is it a bug wif registax? cause i took around 540 frames but registax only detected 279 despite me selecting all the 540...hmm..weird..
If I remember correctly, RegiStax got a feature call "quality filter" which will determine the quality of the frames and remove them from stacking if it "think" the quality of the frame is less than the setting.

Anyway, nice image for a second attempt!! Keep trying and you'll soon get your Jupiter image... :)

Happy imaging and have a nice day.
Yang Weixing
:mrgreen: "The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance." :mrgreen:
User avatar
rcj
Vendor
Posts: 3043
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Katong
Contact:

Post by rcj »

Hi Tungkian,

yes it is the quality estimator acting up automatically. Although there were a default number of frames to process initially, Registax will sort and rank them from lowest to highest quality. You can also manually select the number of frames out of the default selection by moving the long slider located at the bottom of the Registax interface software.
Photon Bucket
http://www.celestialportraits.com
Facebook page: celestialportraits
tungkian
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:14 am

Post by tungkian »

hmm..i just realised that the image looks like there are *light* rings around it depending on how bright the computer screen is set at..hmm..

i'll try to stack more photos with another shoot sometime soon..thanks for all the help guys!
Post Reply