Some Photos from Punggai

CCD vs Film? Lots of time vs no patience? Alright, this is your place to discuss all the astrophotography what's and what's not. You can discuss about techniques, accessories, cameras, whatever....just make sure you also post some nice photos here too!
User avatar
swat_pup6433
Posts: 310
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 2:16 am
Contact:

Post by swat_pup6433 »

other than the orion with 1 min, 3 min and 5 mins subframes at ISO 400 the other 2 are 3 mins subframes at ISO800 not enuff dark frames.. as usual again ~ haha
User avatar
rcj
Vendor
Posts: 3043
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Katong
Contact:

Post by rcj »

burn into a cd and pass me the raw images! drool....
Photon Bucket
http://www.celestialportraits.com
Facebook page: celestialportraits
User avatar
Tachyon
Posts: 2038
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 11:40 am
Location: Bedok

Post by Tachyon »

Nice!
[80% Steve, 20% Alfred] ------- Probability of Clear Skies = (Age of newest equipment in days) / [(Number of observers) * (Total Aperture of all telescopes present in mm)]
User avatar
zackae
Posts: 217
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 7:34 pm

Post by zackae »

Oh my Sweets! The Last picture there is awesome. It's incredible how 1 nebula is usually so close to the next! With the colour contrast of the 2, beautiful!!!!!! How I wish I was there.....
User avatar
swat_pup6433
Posts: 310
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 2:16 am
Contact:

Post by swat_pup6433 »

ohh uploaded a slightly more Edited version of the M42. still working on it tough. hope it would look slightly better
*re-edited* hope it looks more neutral now..

Image

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3001/282 ... acb4_b.jpg

and a slightly more edited version of the M8 with colour balanced.

Image

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3100/281 ... 2fb0_b.jpg

horsehead with background colour balanced and curves readjusted. not enough exposures to bring out the details.. a little grainy..

Image

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3242/281 ... 8f24_b.jpg
Last edited by swat_pup6433 on Thu Sep 04, 2008 10:50 pm, edited 3 times in total.
universe24
Posts: 227
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 12:26 am

Post by universe24 »

First version of M42 is better. Keep it up.
User avatar
swat_pup6433
Posts: 310
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 2:16 am
Contact:

Post by swat_pup6433 »

eah.. haha okok think i'll work on the 2nd version a little. from my screen at hm it looks fine dont know why in the moninter here it suddenly looks like it has wierd dark spots. hmm.. i'll try calibrate the screen at hm and try editing it again.

*re- edited the photo and replaced the orginal one.. hope it looks more neutral now*
Last edited by swat_pup6433 on Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Clifford60
Posts: 1289
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:41 pm
Location: Central

Post by Clifford60 »

Great jobs
User avatar
Airconvent
Super Moderator
Posts: 5804
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: United Federation of the Planets

Post by Airconvent »

whoa! I like your Orion...nice rich colours and so rich in details..well done ! [smilie=angel2.gif]
The Boldly Go Where No Meade Has Gone Before
Captain, RSS Enterprise NCC1701R
United Federation of the Planets
User avatar
rcj
Vendor
Posts: 3043
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Katong
Contact:

Post by rcj »

prefer the first version of M42. The second one is over processed, a little "Lodrigussish". No offense on him, but do hold it back a little, otherwise it would become like a painting already. A little excitement on triggering heightened saturation levels would be a whoosy.
Photon Bucket
http://www.celestialportraits.com
Facebook page: celestialportraits
Post Reply