What is the difference between protons,photons and photinos?

[Guest]

i have 2 set of 9.1GB crystal clear DVD quality about science before and after einstein.

email to me from USA

cannot distribute because never gone through the local media censored board

the word derived here is a little vague
and everything about fact of science, false or true cannot be left out

the theory of everything and later the development of string theory from it has more or less connected to einstein's work after the invention of the Atomic Bomb.

i hate to tell you what is true or not true
to be a scientist, everything you have to take in that is related to the known fact.

here is an example
http://home.flash.net/~csmith0/theory.htm


einstein wanted to unify the quantum theory with his general thoery with the theory of everything
he failed to so because during his research of this theory with other well known scientist. they all discovered that the atoms and subatomics particles that they know then wasn't all fully discovered.

this led to the research of other unknown subatomics particles and the building of the collision vaccuum tube.

and that led to the discovery of quarks in the experiment in the tube.

from quarks led to the today well known string theory that explained HOW quarks was form and in term form our existant and other dimension that has yet to be discovered and detected.

[ALPiNe]

Hi!

WoW..wow.. How did I managed to lead you guys to this BIG question of, "Does the Theory of Everything really exists? :roll:

Well..truthfully, there IS indeed a Theory of Everything (TOE), which is sometimes called a supergrand unified theory. Theory of everything is a theory that unifies the four fundamental forces of nature: gravity, the strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, and the electromagnetic force, and is the goal of researchers in quantum gravity..

.. regarding the theory of everything, I know that it just means the idea that the universe can be explained by few simple laws. But, Einstein didn't call any of his theories that, so I just want to be clear which theory that is. Still, you should not anyhow call it a "theory of everything"

Yes, I agree with you that the Universe can be explained by a few simple laws. In fact, there is a glimmer of hope that we are somewhat a step closer to discovering this theory which may be the ultimate "Theory of Everything!"

For your background info, currently there has been some hullabaloo about a new theory put forth by Nima Arkani-Hamed of Harvard University. This theory is the result of the behaviour of one omnipresent fluid called a ghost condensate. :roll: The theory explains dark energy, dark matter and the driver of inflation at a stroke, which are the 3 of cosmology's deepest mysteries. In fact, it is derived from Einstein's theory of general relativity.

The theory MAY provide possible explanations for the existence of ghosts. It is not confirmed.

Indeed, if the theory mentioned above can be proven, it can help explain the existence of such ‘ghosts’, which is the ghostly force that haunts the Universe, causing the expansion of space to accelerate, something which could be dated back to the Big Bang itself.

Still awake!? HahaHAha.. Yeap, that’s Theory of Everything for you. 8) With such a link between TOE and condensed matter physics with regards to the Big Bang, perhaps this could serve as a bridge that brings us a step closer to understanding the Universe in a much broader perspective.

With Regards,
ALPiNe

[Guest]

<<The theory explains dark energy, dark matter>>

as the sentence speak for itself
matter, space and energy
time is not involved

theory of everything is a more detail aspect of space AND time

existence of ghost can be comfirmed a not that depend on whether you look into the aspect of spacetime continuum

and time itself which most scientists have discovered do not exist!!!!