Meade LS-8 ACF

Here is the place to talk about all those equipment(Telescope, Mounts, Eyepieces, etc...) you have. Not sure which scope/eyepiece is best for you? Trash it out here!
User avatar
Gary
Posts: 3790
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 7:06 am
Location: Toa Payoh
Contact:

Post by Gary »

dcastro wrote:Thanks Gary, I was trying to add as attachments but I think the files were too large. Appreciate your guidance for future reference.
You are welcomed. It is not that your files were too large (in the context of present day terabyte storage technology), it is the images maximum upload size of this forum that is too small - only 65 KB.

Unfortunately, many first-time and would be first-time image uploaders find this out the hard way and precious time is wasted and some frustrations creeps in when trying to figure out what they did wrong.

I do understand the need to limit the image filesize to prevent the potential overloading of the server's hosting capabilities. But 65 KB is way too low. Moreover, even if in the event there is an overloading of the forum's image hosting capabilities, that is a HAPPY problem - many people are willing to share their astrophotos here instead of elsewhere which in return attracts more awareness for Singastro which in return attracts more membership which in return attracts more private and commercial sponsorship of the forum hosting fees.

Here are the step-by-step instructions of how to attach Flickr images to this forum:
http://www.singastro.org/viewtopic.php? ... ght=#63881
Last edited by Gary on Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:01 am, edited 2 times in total.
http://www.astro.sg
email: gary[at]astro.sg
twitter: @astrosg


"The importance of a telescope is not how big it is, how well made it is.
It is how many people, less fortunate than you, got to look through it."
-- John Dobson.
dcastro
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 6:24 pm

Post by dcastro »

One thing I will say is the finder is not terribly helpful. It comes integrated with the telescope but the red dot obscures anything except the brightest object. Any suggestions on a good replacement for it would be welcome.
User avatar
Gary
Posts: 3790
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 7:06 am
Location: Toa Payoh
Contact:

Post by Gary »

I have been using a Telrad. Sure, it is bulky and doesn't look cool. But it simply works. The Telrad rings are wonderful visual guides to learn how to star hop. This article may be helpful in your research:
http://www.astrobargains.com/Articles/t ... finder.htm
http://www.astro.sg
email: gary[at]astro.sg
twitter: @astrosg


"The importance of a telescope is not how big it is, how well made it is.
It is how many people, less fortunate than you, got to look through it."
-- John Dobson.
User avatar
timatworksg
Posts: 767
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:42 pm
Location: Pasir Ris

Post by timatworksg »

I have a red dot and still use it...mainly cos it's lighter. But yes the red glow does obscure the sight. What I do is roll the switch to turn the light on/off. That way I can check to see if the red dot is where I want it to be.
My wife never complained about how much time, effort & money I spent on my Astronomy hobby!................suddenly I met her!!!
dcastro
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 6:24 pm

Post by dcastro »

Thanks timatwork, I might try that first as a cheap solution. If it doesn't work out then I might have a look at the Telrad. Thanks all
User avatar
Bergkamp_
Posts: 1581
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 11:31 pm
Favourite scope: Telescope that i can bring out
Location: Singapore, Bukit Panjang

Post by Bergkamp_ »

Hmm tried the green laser as finder? =)
Wee Ern aRmeD wiF Telescope reAdY tO taKe ovEr thE skY .. wIF jUst mY naKed eYEs .
superiorstream
Posts: 1501
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 4:45 pm

Post by superiorstream »

Hi,Dcastro
This may work:--Get the reducer say the f/6.3 model;retrofit it so that it can be fitted to the BACK of the telescope and also take a eyepiece after that.Buy a 40mm(if possible use a 50mm or better 55mm or 56mm eyepiece)--prefered a 2 in wide angle eyepiece--and fit it AFTER the f/6.3 reducer.This combination MAY do away with the viewfinder and if you are using a f-5 or f-5.9 scope -refractor--it will yield direct a field of view of the sky of approx 6 degree.(A normal 50mm viewfinder give a sky field of view of 6 degree whereas a 30mm type give a sky field of 7 to 8 degree at most)This is what I did.After finding the object you want;switch eyepiece to the high magnification one you want to do actual viewing/photography.This way;you can find even DIM OBJECTS that even a 50mm viewfinder won"t review.I had used this method on my f/5 150mm refractor and its totally effective.
On SCT that come originally as f/10 you may get a 2 to 3 degree view WITH A CENTER DARK CIRCLE PATCH;but for viewfinder /viewfinding purposes,who cares.
This VIEWFINDING EYEPIECES really works.It do away with the clumsy viewfinder and make locating my target--especially the dim ones-- much easier.My 2 cents.
User avatar
Bergkamp_
Posts: 1581
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 11:31 pm
Favourite scope: Telescope that i can bring out
Location: Singapore, Bukit Panjang

Post by Bergkamp_ »

Chia's method i use it when my WO90 got no finder, i do it without reducer of cos.. its ok if u got a goto mount.. if not green laser is pretty gd too =)
Wee Ern aRmeD wiF Telescope reAdY tO taKe ovEr thE skY .. wIF jUst mY naKed eYEs .
dcastro
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 6:24 pm

Post by dcastro »

Thanks. Viewing direct through the back of the scope is a bit tricky without a diagonal because of the clearance. I am also a bit fuzzy on the details by Chia but thanks! Will try these ideas out as the sky clears.
dcastro
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 6:24 pm

Post by dcastro »

Just been reading the manual while waiting for skies to clear. Previously one of the queries was whether it will take 2 inch eyepieces. The answer is yes, but you have to buy the optional 2 inch diagonal.

Clear skies and Merry Christmas to everyone.
Hope it does clear - I have offered to bring the scope to a relative's house tomorrow for a party and cumulus gets old really fast
Post Reply