Operation: ISON Barycentrism for Comet ISON enthusiasts

[Vincent_WF]

See a paper on "Dynamical characterization of the last prolonged solar minima" that elaborates with quantitative analysis on an imminent Grand Minimum.


"Fig. 6. Radial acceleration ar; PE storage at 0.16 solar radius facing the barycentre (PEv), and the observed sunspots series (SN). The particular dynamics around the impulsive events produce a dramatic decrease of the hypothetic PE in the studied solar zone. The ‘X’ symbol marks the minima in PEv values; they occur ~1593–1632-1670; ~1772–1811-1850; ~1951-1990–2030 (see the text for explanation [Page 8/12]). Acceleration reckoning in UA d2. PEv plot in logarithmic scale." - Excerpt from the paper on page 9/12.

From the barycentric perspective, when the PEv values were low (marked X) as a result of the Sun was very near to the quasi SSB during the troughs of the solar minima in 1650 (Wolf number) and SC6 (SIDC) in 1811, there were occurrences of the grand solar minima during the troughs of these solar cycles, and for the solar minimum of SC26 in 2030 the PEv value would also be at a low value. When those PEv values were low during the peaks of the solar maxima of SC2, SC9, SC18, SC22, there was no occurrence of any grand solar minimum at all.

The ~20 year integral cycle of Sun, Jupiter, and Saturn, interacting with the ~11 year half-integral cycle in the barycentric alignments of Jupiter and Saturn barycenter, Sun, and BOTSS, would generate the ~220 year (20x11) long-range half cycle.

Heuristically, the commencing of the solar cycle 25 should result in the sunspot numbers to rise in the coming years until it reaches the solar maximum. Nonetheless, the peak of this solar cycle 25 could be expected to be as low as the solar maximum of the solar cycle 05, which happened in Feb 1805 at 220 years ago from the solar maximum of the solar cycle 05. And towards the end of the solar cycle 25, with its comparable position of BOTSS positioned near the mass center of the Sun, it could manifest a Grand Solar minimum of a lesser Dalton minimum magnitude with the near position during the solar cycle trough in 2030.

This solar minimum anticipated to happen around 2030 with the near superior conjunction of Saturn-Sun-Jupiter, could be anticipated to be prolonged at around the trough at the end of the solar cycle 25. And this prolonged trough of the solar minimum would be similar to the solar minimum of the solar cycle 06 that had begun in Aug 1810 with the superior conjunction of Saturn-Sun-Jupiter formed in around 1812. And thus the mass center of the Sun was cyclically positioned at the closest point to the barycenter of the Solar System with Uranus and Neptune positioned at the side of Saturn away from Jupiter and the Sun.

The year 1812 was the beginning of the coldest years that last until 1818 during the Dalton minimum (roughly between 1790 and 1830). Despite 1816 was remembered as the year without summer, but that year was not the coldest year between 1812 and 1818.

From the barycentric perspective, the trough period of the Grand Solar Minimum occurring during the anticipated solar minimum in February 2030, is the recurrence of a 220-year long-range solar cycle as a result of a long period barycentric alignment of the four gas giants with the mass center of the Sun and the barycenter of the Solar System. As a result of the near superior conjunction of Saturn-Sun-Jupiter during the anticipated solar minimum with Uranus and Neptune positioned at the side of Saturn away from Jupiter and the Sun, the mass center of the Sun would cyclically approach very near to the barycenter of the Solar System in late March 2030, which would coincide with the trough period the solar cycle 26 around its solar minimum.

The full-blown effects of the 220-year long-range solar cycle occurring to Earth after the solar maximum in October 2023, could be expected to begin thereafter till it reaches the deepest trough of the anticipated Grand Solar Minimum in late March 2030 when the mass center of the Sun approaches very near to the barycenter of the Solar System, and its effects would then oscillate to wean off thereon.

From the barycentric perspective, a Grand Solar Minimum is indeed imminent.

[Vincent_WF]

In the UVS worldview, the Little Ice Age events occurred during the grand solar minima were caused by a long cycle precession effect with the orbital forcing of the barycentric Solar System.

The mass center of the Sun with the orbital motion of the major Solar System objects would cyclically cause it to be positioned very near to the BOTSS. The Sun when cyclically positioned at its nearest approach to the BOTSS, is therefore spiraling at its lowest angular momentum. Hence, with reduced total solar irradiance from the Sun during the solar minima, and also the long-ranged cyclical alignments of the Solar System objects with their tidal effects that extremely intensify the nested polar vortex on the Earth during the winters caused by the orbital forcing of its axial tilt, these effects therefore could cyclically render the Little Ice Age phenomena on Earth that would be synchronized with the grand solar minima during the troughs of the solar cycle.

From the barycentric perspective, the superior conjunction of the major Solar System barycenters would cause the Sun to cyclically move very near the BOTSS. And when this coincides with the troughs of the solar minima, it would render the Little Ice Age events. And it was observed when the superior conjunction of the major Solar System barycenters had happened during the peaks of the solar maxima, these barycentric alignments did not manifest any grand solar minimum at all.



Dr. Timo Niroma discovered a long-range solar cycle with the Wolf number of a 400-year-plus sunspot record, which suggests the next grand solar minima could occur around 2031; this discovery infers a Little Ice Age could also occur as a result.

From the barycentric perspective, the longer orbital resonance of Sun, Jupiter, and Saturn would render this ~220 year long-range cycle. (The ~20 year integral cycle x ~11 year half-integral solar cycle)

The orbital inclination of the Earth's orbit relative to the invariable plane has a ~100,000 year cycle, the axial precession of Earth has a cycle of ~25,800 years, and the axial tilt of Earth that causes seasons on Earth has a cycle of ~1 year. The approximate orbital resonance of Jupiter and Saturn has an approximate synodic cycle of ~59.3 years, and it also has a long-range cycle of ~220 years. The orbital resonance of Uranus and Neptune has a sidereal cycle of ~172 years, the orbital resonance of the barycenter of Jupiter and Saturn and the barycenter of Uranus and Neptune has a near synodic cycle of ~177.9 years. The orbital resonance of Jupiter and Saturn has a sidereal cycle of ~20 years, the Sun has an integral solar cycle of ~22 years, in which the half-integral solar cycle averages at ~11 years.

Heuristically, the major climate variations on Earth are primarily and largely governed by the planetary mechanism that renders the long and short solar cycles of the barycentric Solar System.

“Local physical laws are determined by the large-scale structure of the universe.” - Mach's principle

[Vincent_WF]

A Great Conjunction of almost aligned Jupiter and Saturn would occur on 21st December during this winter solstice.



During the winter solstice, Earth, Sun, and the Galactic Center would also be quite aligned.

From the barycentric perspective, such a planetary torque-induced precession could render severe geology and atmospheric events on Earth globally. And these events would get from bad to worst while the Great Conjunction forms and thus intensifies its effects.

[Vincent_WF]

For those who could follow this thread, you would be able to appreciate the following qualitative predictions for solar cycle 25.

This UVS case study applied visual analysis with a barycentric Solar System model to qualitatively predict the solar minimum and maximum of the solar cycle 25, and completes the analysis with its prediction for the solar minimum of the solar cycle 26.



This visual analysis is predicting the solar maximum of the solar cycle 25 would occur in October 2023 with the Sun-SSB-BJS-BUN alignment in phase 3 of the 3-body motion. AAnd with the comparative analysis of the past solar cycles, it predicts at this solar maximum the Sun would switch its magnetic pole to the reversed state when SSB moves in between the alignment of Sun and BJSUN in solar cycle 25. Uranus and Neptune would not be perturbing the periodicity of this solar maximum rendered with this BJS cycle as a result of BUN would also be in the alignment.



It is also predicting the solar minimum of the solar cycle 26 would occur in February 2030 with the BUN-Sun-SSB-BJS alignment in phase 4 of the 3-body motion. And with the comparative analysis of the past solar cycles, it predicts at the solar minimum of solar cycle 26 when SSB moves to the opposition of the Sun and BJSUN, the Sun would not switch its magnetic pole. Uranus and Neptune would not be perturbing the periodicity of this solar minimum rendered with this BJS cycle as a result of BUN would also be in the alignment.



Disclaimer: This barycentric planetarium of Celestia is based on its quasi Solar System Barycenter (SSB), which is not the actual BOTSS. Consequently, the actual dates for the solar minimum of solar cycle 26 could slightly vary for the case study of this solar cycle when the mass center of the Sun is positioned very near to the BOTSS. Also, this animation was mostly sampled at six-month intervals with rough estimations, and there could be E&OE of the manual works.

[Vincent_WF]

Cosmic bubbles may have forged dark matter, new theory suggests

In the UVS worldview, the postulated cosmic bubbles are nested clusters of vortical hyperspheres.

This new theory suggesting dark matter may have been forged by cosmic bubbles is coherent with the cosmological model of UVS.

From the UVS perspective, dark matters are intrinsically formed minute vortical hyperspheres, which are resonated to quantize in the nested vortical hypersphere of the cosmos. And supervoids are the vortical hyperspheres of the macrososm, in what the theory described it as cosmic bubbles.

[Vincent_WF]

This barycentric analysis as shown with the yellow line sketched in the chart, shows the 11-year solar cycle is largely correlated with the barycentric alignment of Sun-SSB-BJS.

For SC14 Max, it is showing in the sunspot cycle chart with the Sun-SSB-BJS alignment there was only around 100 sunspots counts (traced with the roughly sketched yellow line). With reference to the sunspot cycle chart, the animation is also showing the oscillations of BJSUN in the Sun-SSB-BJSUN alignment had fluctuated the sunspots counts to above 175 in three upward spikes when BJSUN was aligned, and fell below 50 in three downward spikes when BJSUN had moved out of the alignment.

To inspect the elements in the SIDC sunspot chart, visit the UVS webpage on "The barycentric drivers of the solar cycle" by clicking on the boxes in the chart to show the respective barycentric alignments.



This animation at a higher sampling rate is showing the oscillation of BJSUN with the alignment Sun and SSB, is correlated with the minor fluctuations of the 11-year solar cycle. (Remark: Needs a much higher sampling rate and screen resolution to properly see this, which the hardware of my PC at the moment could not handle for producing such high-res animation.)

In the reference frame of SSB that aligns with the barycenter of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune (BJSUN as a cyan dot), the animation showed BJS (as a red dot) was revolving around the BJSUN with its clockwise differential revolution against the cyclonic motion of the gas giants.

This is the basis for the barycentric predictions for solar cycle 25.

Nonetheless, it would still be necessary to thoroughly investigate the entire solar cycle records with an interactive barycentric planetarium application with the capability to more accurately indicate and show how the barycenters of the gas giants were dynamically revolving around the barycenter of the Solar System.

P.S. A person responded to program the add-on for indicating the barycenters with a barycentric planetarium applet, told me he would only be free after one year later. Hence, has to make do with these manually drawn indicators in the planetarium charts for the time being.

[Vincent_WF]

The fluctuations of solar cycle 1 were briefly investigated with a simulated barycentric planetarium that improvised to show the alignment of Sun and SSB.

In the secondary case study for solar cycle 1 as shown with the above animation, the analysis showed the haphazard planetary alignments of the major planets and their barycenters were extensively associated with the solar cycle fluctuations. And 9 out of these 15 cases involved the alignments of the major barycenters.

However, not every fluctuation demonstrated planetary alignment.

Nonetheless, this cursory case study is sufficed to show the solar cycle fluctuations were largely correlated with the erratic planetary alignments of the major Solar System objects and their barycenters.

The finding of this case study warrants a thorough investigation of the entire solar cycle records.

“Although his (UVS) model is lacking quantitative method, yet he is able to predict solar cycle fluctuations.” (17th Feb 2020) - Dr. Victor Christianto & Dr. Florentin Smarandache.

[Vincent_WF]

In 2029 the barycenter of Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune (BJSN) would have entered the inner Solar System.

And this barycenter has the mass effect of the gas giants summed up.

It's orbital forcing at close encounter with the Earth in March 2029 could cause much upheaval, such as
severe geology events happening on Earth till it leaves.

A mere brushing over by BJSN on the Earth could completely eclipse the 1908 Tunguska event[UVS].

No telescope or any kind of space watching observations could see it coming.

Not even any of the "Spaceguard" activities could detect it, these include the Lincoln Near-Earth Asteroid Research (LINEAR), Spacewatch, Near-Earth Asteroid Tracking (NEAT), Lowell Observatory Near-Earth-Object Search (LONEOS), Catalina Sky Survey (CSS), Campo Imperatore Near-Earth Object Survey (CINEOS), Japanese Spaceguard Association, Asiago-DLR Asteroid Survey (ADAS) and Near-Earth Object WISE (NEOWISE).

[Vincent_WF]

The UVS worldview[uvs] is a generalization of the cosmos[w], which is postulated to be intrinsically manifested in a nested vortical hypersphere[uvs] of Universal Vortical Singularity[uvs].

Remark: This is the worldview[w] of a non-standard cosmology[w] developed with the methodology[w] of its visual grounded theory[w].

With collective syntheses of the UVS hypotheses in a nested positive feedback loop[uvs] for its augmentation as a theory of everything[w], it is a perspectivism[w] explicated with the UVS research in the discipline of metaphysical naturalism[w].

From the UVS perspective, the formation of the cosmos from the macrocosms to the microcosms is rendered by an underlying aetheric entity with its resonated vortical motion, which inversely begets all physical structures of the cosmos.

In the UVS worldview, the structure of the observable universe[uvs] with all its objects, is intrinsically formed in a cascading manner of the nested cosmic hypersphere[uvs] with its vortically transformed torus[w] structures.

This worldview could be invoked in the visual inductive resolutions of the UVS research[uvs] with the UVS model, which explicates to elucidate on how an archetype[w] of the nested vortical hypersphere is subliminally underlying and interacting with everything in the observable universe[w].

The cosmos in its postulated nested vortical hypersphere, is hypothesized to be formed by the resonated standing waves[w] of its nested unisonal vortices[uvs] from the macrocosms to the microcosms in an aether vortical motion[uvs].

This vortical motion of an all-pervasive aetheric medium in a nested hyperspherical encapsulation of the cosmos, manifests all forms of discrete matter[w] to vortically emerge, exist, transform, coalesce, transmute, and evolve in its paradigm[d].

Its effect vortically quantizes elementary particles[d] in the cosmos to particulate in the variants of its nested hyperspherical encapsulation of toroidal vortices, and then vortically coalesce them as discrete structures that are vortically transformed and formed at all scale levels[uvs].

All physical existences are weaved in vortical motion; nothing physical is not vortical.

This worldview could offer the insights for perceiving the underlying nested vortical structures and mechanism of numerous observable celestial objects, and how they actually work.

[Vincent_WF]

The CMB dipole in Mollweide projection[w].
Credit: DMR, COBE, NASA, Four-Year Sky Map - Source

The COBE temperature map of the CMB dipole[uvs], is empirical evidence for the observable universe[w] was formed in a precessing toroidal structure that intrinsically spins in vortical motion.

With visual thinking[w] invoking the UVS worldview, the observable universe as perceived in this methodological naturalism[w] approach could be visualized to be encapsulated in a steady-state[d] nested toroidal structure. It could thus be perceived that the Earth is being vortically impelled in its planetary system, its star system, the Milky Way, the Local Group, the Virgo Supercluster, and so forth inside the cosmos, and it is systematically moving with a composite vortical motion in the nested toroidal structure.

From the UVS perspective, all toroidal vortices are intrinsically resonated to manifest in the closed system[w] of the nested vortical hypersphere of the cosmos, which is persistently impelled by the aether vortical motion in the open system[w] of the cosmos.

With the induced motion of an all-pervasive aetheric medium in the non-material phase of the cosmos, and encapsulated in a nested torus structure of force field with spheroidal pushed-in vortical repulsive effect, the resonated torque-free precession[w] renders a runaway perpetual vortical motion[uvs] with its standing waves formed in an outside-in manner. This effect thus weaves its nested vortical hyperspheres from the aetheric macrocosm of the cosmos towards its microcosms.

The harmonics of its steady state[w] vortical motion interacting in the closed systems of the aetheric medium, thus resonate in its outside-in manner to vortically manifest the ever smallest quantized physical structures with the intrinsically resonated effects of their torque-induced precession[w].

And thus, the vortically spawned elementary particles[uvs] with the dynamics of their nested vortical motions intrinsically resonated in the microcosms, orderly coalesce in an inside-out manner for the nested vortical formations of the ever larger physical structures in the macrocosms of the cosmos.

The underlying process with the vortical motions transferred from the nested vortical hypersphere of the cosmos, vortically forms the varieties of physical objects[w] in a typical inverse manner. Intrinsically, with the vortically manifested negations of the cosmos, it thus imbues the paradoxical effect of the cosmos[uvs] in the objective reality[m].

“Local physical laws are determined by the large-scale structure of the universe.” - Mach's principle