Airconvent wrote:... As a rule of thumb, you need to increase the aperture diameter by 50% to see improvement. Hence to upgrade from a 5" scope, the next option is 8"...
UK,
I generally agree with Airconvent on this rule-of-thumb. Based on photometric principle on the factor of square root of 2 (which is around 1.4142), it would be better to have at least 41.42% increase in aperture to perceive a doubling of light capture.
Our sensory nerves exhibit logarithmic response (intensity of sensation and magnitude of stimulus is related by "Weber-Fechner rule")... in the case of visual response, doubling is needed each time to generate significant noticeable differences. That's why lens stops increase by factor of 1.4 (that is... f1, f1.4, f2, f2.8, f4, f5.6, f8, f11, f16, f22, f32).
By the way, if you do disappear from under the night skies, I know I can find you in daytime chasing treetop butterflies with that scope ...
Up for a good scope (this same Mak 127 model would have been my first scope, if I had not been subsequently tempted by the ED refractor shown in my avatar).