M20 Trifid Nebula

CCD vs Film? Lots of time vs no patience? Alright, this is your place to discuss all the astrophotography what's and what's not. You can discuss about techniques, accessories, cameras, whatever....just make sure you also post some nice photos here too!
DotDotDotZ
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 8:12 pm
Location: Singapore

Post by DotDotDotZ »

wow....beautiful photo :shock:
User avatar
cataclysm
Posts: 1024
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:23 pm

Post by cataclysm »

A modified camera shouldn't affect the blue channel... May be you are too aggressive with your processing??
Could be. I forgot to mention that IDAS light pollution filter was employed. That may be the cause of it. Will try without the filter next time. Too kia su la!
The reason why cataclysm's photo is poor in blue is simple. Because his H-alpha photos (which doesn't have blue and green spectrum) have exposure that is longer that his colour photos. So when you stack them together, you see very poor blue.
This may not be the case. The H-alpha frames were grey scaled and were only used as luminance for the final image. My best guess is the Mewlon is inherently slow and coupled with the higher sensitivity to Red of the modified camera may be the cause. To get the rest of the colours, i would probably have to tripple or quadruple the total exposures.
Anyone has other ideas?
User avatar
VinSnr
Administrator
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 7:01 pm
Location: Andromeda Galaxy

Post by VinSnr »

This may not be the case. The H-alpha frames were grey scaled and were only used as luminance for the final image
why do you grey scaled the H-alpha? You are not taking RGB are you?

Maybe you should explain exactly what you did, if not it will be hard to deduce why the blue is lacking.
User avatar
Airconvent
Super Moderator
Posts: 5804
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: United Federation of the Planets

Post by Airconvent »

wow weixing...
This seems to be your best effort ever! The image is so rich in colours they are awesome....Hope to see more of this expecially from Singapore skies.
Cataclysm is not doing too bad either...The master and the disciple! heh heh
The Boldly Go Where No Meade Has Gone Before
Captain, RSS Enterprise NCC1701R
United Federation of the Planets
User avatar
rcj
Vendor
Posts: 3043
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Katong
Contact:

Post by rcj »

excellent image weixing! you might like to try www.1111mb.com to host the images, no pop-ups and 5G of space. I am using that for my personal website
Photon Bucket
http://www.celestialportraits.com
Facebook page: celestialportraits
User avatar
rcj
Vendor
Posts: 3043
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Katong
Contact:

Post by rcj »

kelvin,

you might like to take longer RGB data for the modified DSLR. Also when you are in PS, perhaps you could check that the histogram profiles for each colour channel has roughly the same spread, nevertheless it is a good try!
Photon Bucket
http://www.celestialportraits.com
Facebook page: celestialportraits
User avatar
VinSnr
Administrator
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 7:01 pm
Location: Andromeda Galaxy

Post by VinSnr »

In the first place, need to also know what is being "modified" in that 350D. There are three kinds of modification that people usually do

1) Totally remove camera filter. For this, you get all the spectrum but you can't autofocus or use the viewfinder

2) Replace camera filter with clear glass. All the spectrum will be there and you can autofocus and use viewfinder

3) Replace camera filter with a different UV/IR filter or deep sky filter. Now this one is tricky. You need to find out first the properties of this filter before using any other external filters.

So which one of the above is the modified camera? It will have impact on the images.
Post Reply