Operation: ISON Barycentrism for Comet ISON enthusiasts

[Vincent_WF]

.
The UVS research with its inductive resolution on sunspot postulated it is an intrinsically manifested plasmatic unisonal vortex.

And this claim was like a fluke shot made way back in 2007 before any of its supportive evidence showed up at all.



The above image of sunspot clusters was a caption from the ESA website.

However, anyone looking at the close-up image of a sunspot would see it does not resemble the usual kind of vortex at all.

And so inevitably this UVS postulation would irk those who were well-informed to doubt it has anything to do with science at all. This could be very irritating to the incumbents with the very mind-bending disruption of the UVS postulation that seems to be coming out of nowhere.

This was the reason I was not willing to post in the SingAstro forum at all even on its astronomy aspects. This has been so if not for Dark Nepture had relentless persisted and insisted; this very excited teenager at then had no idea what could be coming for advocating a non-standard cosmology openly in the community. This was also the reason I had hesitated to respond to Cheryl because of its de facto social stigma, as were demonstrated with some members who had posted in this thread. Nonetheless, I was impressed with their courage for boldly standing out against all odds on what they believe, and also grateful to those who had dropped by to express their support.

And if not for the two independent professors who had separately flown over to personally visit me in the little red dot with their nudges, as well as those who had explicitly endorsed the UVS research authentically with their actual names and the establishments where they were from, and those who had done so anonymously, and also after some reflections during the circuit breaker lockdown, I had preferred to have more peaceful moments and so have had no desire at all to further post my UVS stuff here in the past.

Whatsoever, how so could this very bizarre claim be legit at all?

The predictive power on this qualitative prediction of the UVS research lies in the coherentism of the UVS grounded theory and its comparative analyses, which were evaluated with its epistemic process and methodology.

Its inductive resolution despite was first induced with the UVS model in its conceptual framework, the insights for its assertion came from its comparative analyses with the UVS inductive resolution on the vortices of Jupiter.

The inductive resolution on the vortices of Jupiter was very telling with the following resolves for suggesting the sunspot is a plasmatic unisonal vortex:

- It resolved that the cloud bands of Jupiter were formed by the nested polar vortex pair.
- It resolved that the jet streams of Jupiter are the nested ring torus substructure of its nested polar vortex pair.
- It resolved that the ovals and storms on Jupiter are its satellite vortices impelled by the nested polar vortex pair.



In the UVS worldview, the hyperspherical vortex mechanism of Jupiter is very comparable to the Sun.

From the UVS perspective, the observed polar aurora on Jupiter suggested Jupiter could be perceived as a failed star; it merely did not have the sufficient vortically induced dynamo effect to ignite its plasma glow for its entire surface to lit up like the Sun. Heuristically, Jupiter and Sun have striking similarities in many aspects for their vortical nature, and thus are very comparable in the UVS worldview.

So, with the UVS inductive resolution to understand the underlying vortical mechanism that modulates Jupiter, it has had provided the insights for asserting sunspot is a satellite plasma vortex that was being intrinsically impelled by the nested jet streams of the Sun's nested polar vortex pair.

Heuristically, it could be perceived that the penumbra of a typical sunspot is a plasmatic chain of magnetic satellite vortices manifested in a ring torus structure that has had concentrically formed around the outer rim of its umbra.



The observed cloud bands on Jupiter with differential rotations and retrograde jet streams suggested the photosphere of the Sun could also be nested in a similar manner, and thus could somehow oscillate to render the magnetic cycle with its prograde and retrograde dynamo effects.

Its inductive resolution on the planetary rings of Jupiter suggested what could have caused the formations of the asteroid belt and the Kuiper belt.

Along with its other inductive resolutions, much on the mysterious phenomena about the Sun were thus resolved with their further analyses and case studies, which were then subsequently backed up by the lastest astronomy observations that somehow had later shown up.

With this methodology of the UVS research to visualize the underlying vortical structures and mechanisms of the mysteriously rendered natural phenomena, it thus intuitively revealed their actualities. The rest is just details.

As such, the Sun centric Solar System as we all know with the mainstream endorsed model, could be revolutionized with the paradigm shift of the UVS planetary hypersphere model that postulates a barycentric Solar System, which explicitly explicates on the actualities of the Solar System that are coherently and correspondingly referred to reality.

For anyone who wondered why an accomplished satellite scientist and his team thought the UVS treatise is original and exciting, check out the UVS section on "Afterword", which elaborates on the inception of the UVS research.

“All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.” - Galileo Galilei

“If you find from your own experience that something is a fact and it contradicts what some authority has written down, then you must abandon the authority and base your reasoning on your own findings.” - Leonardo da Vinci

“We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers.” - Carl Sagan

[Vincent_WF]

In the UVS worldview, the cosmos is an aetheric nested vortical hypersphere, and all celestial objects are intrinsically formed within that system.

Remark: This is a cosmological conceptual framework of the UVS worldview, and it predicates a non-standard cosmology for developing the UVS treatise with its atypical grounded theory methodology.

In a nutshell, the nested vortical hypersphere of the cosmos is an aetheric structure formed in the paradigm of a vortical hypersphere of 137 nested 3-spheres, and it resonates to intrinsically form its nested vortical hyperspheres with variants of the torus transformed structures.

A nested solid torus structure.

A transforming torus structure.

Note: Animation of the torus shows that as the distance to the axis of revolution decreases, the ring torus becomes a horn torus, then a spindle torus, and when the distance approaches zero, the torus will resemble a sphere.

A two-axis spin torus structure.

The CMB dipole in Mollweide projection.

This cosmic hypersphere cosmos can be visualized as a precessing nested torus structure with an intrinsic two-axis spin.

The empirically observed CMB dipole is a piece of compelling evidence for the UVS postulation of this metaphysical abstract.

Note: The cosmological model of UVS is a qualitative prediction predicated with the UVS model in 2007, and it was predicted before Professor Patrick Wirtz highlighted the observed CMB dipole in his thread in 2008 after he briefly evaluated the UVS treatise. In a group discussion within the ToE internet forum, among the other UVS topics, he discussed on the UVS inductive resolution on galaxy group that predicates a similar aetheric torus structure that encapsulates the Cartwheel galaxy group. And shortly after, he posted the CMB dipole image he had found.

The nested hypersphere of the Cartwheel galaxy group.

And evidently, its hyperspherical variants of transformed torus structures are ubiquitously demonstrated in the entire observable universe.

Heuristically, with the precession effect of its orthogonal two-axis spin intrinsically resonated in the nested cosmic hypersphere, it harmonically weaves its nested hyperspherical vortices from the macrocosms to the microcosms.

With the induced aether vortical motions of the cosmos, all matters are vortically formed, scattered, and then coalesced with the vortical spin fusion resonated in the nested manner of the cosmic hypersphere.

This vortical process in the material phase of the nested vortical hypersphere cosmos, vortically forms the elementary particles in an inside-out nested manner, which then cyclically and periodically coalesced as the various types of atoms in their outside-in manners to form the various types of molecules and compounds. These material structures in the microcosms are inversely formed in their nested aetheric hyperspherical vortices, and they are formed with the extrinsic vortical motions of their torque-induced precession that have resonated intrinsically.

In a nutshell, matters emerge vortically in an inside-out nested manner from their resonated hyperspheres, and are then vortically coalesced in the outside-in nested manner of the cosmic hypersphere.

In the outside-in manner that vortically coalesces the scattered matters in the macrocosms, the nested hyperspherical vortices of the cosmos thus undulate to orderly form the nested structures of superclusters, galaxy clusters, galaxy groups, galaxies, satellite galaxies, star systems, and planetary systems.

The vortical process with the transferred vortical motion of their non-material nested vortical hyperspheres, thus inversely forms the vortically transformed physical structures in a topsy-turvy manner throughout the cosmos. And the rudimentary nested cosmic hypersphere with its underlying vortical structures and mechanism being obscured from plain sights in the objective reality, it subliminally rendered the paradoxical effect of the cosmos that naturally negates to obfuscate with all diversity of its paradoxically demonstrated natural phenomena.

With loads of empirical evidence that coherently and systematically substantiate the propositional actualities of these natural phenomena, the UVS treatise cogently offers a unifying way for perceiving how the entire observable universe works unisonally throughout macrocosm and microcosm as a single system.

The UVS treatise with this cosmological model coherently explicates on the actualities of the natural phenomena that are being vortically demonstrated throughout the entire observable universe, and with its consistent corresponding theory of truth, it thus could revolutionize the standard cosmological model.

See the UVS subtopic on "The cognitive paradox fallacy in Big Bang model on the metric expansion of space".

“This (UVS) is coming in a big way.” (Oct 2007) - Mr. Au Mun Chew, sidewalk astronomer, retired lecturer of the National University of Singapore.

p.s. With gratitude to Mr. Au for being the first person to explicitly embrace the UVS treatise when it was at its infancy stage.

[Vincent_WF]

An artist's impression of a UVS hypothesized nested hyperspherical vortex shown with the vortically formed spiral arms manifested on its accretion disc.

At a vantage point looking closed-up at a galactical system, it depicts the galactic hypersphere structure of a galaxy with the hyperspheres of its planetary systems nested within. And it also indicatively shows this galactic hypersphere is among numerous similar scale distant galactic hyperspheres dotted in the background among some other star clusters.



The M81 galaxy. Photo credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech.


The protoplanetary disk formed around the young AB Aurigae star.
This observation was made with the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope (ESO's VLT).

See the UVS topic on "The structure of the observable universe" that elaborates with the UVS worldview on how the physical structures of the cosmos are intrinsically formed in its nested hyperspherical vortex.

[Vincent_WF]

The UVS model postulates the cosmos is formed in an aetheric vortical hypersphere of 137 nested 3-spheres.

This abstract of the UVS model in a simple manner for the ease of understanding, could be conceptually visualized by simulating with the Moiré patterns of a dual-core monopole system.



The above image is an illustration for depicting the hypersphere of a single-core monopole spheroidal vortex.



The above diagrams are the closed-up views for two separate single-core hyperspheres. These are for illustrating the isotropic core-seeking force field used for the Moiré patterns simulation. The spoke lines represent the vortical core-seeking force field of a vortical hypersphere, which are formed by longitudinal standing waves of tightly packed quantized aetheric vortices pushing in toward the singularity of the core. You can rock your browser up and down to see how the single-core hypersphere with its visual effect on the computer screen could show as a single-core nested torus structure.

The core-seeking force field of an aetheric vortical hypersphere in its inertial frame of reference, is a monopole having its quantized aetheric vortices pushing in vortically toward the core in the hyperspherical confinement of its vortically manifested boundary.



This above illustrated 2D diagram demonstrates the optical effects of two singularity points with their two sets of spoke lines visually superimposed. Their interference patterns could be perceived to have formed as a nested torus structure of a nested dual-core hypersphere of 3-sphere.

Hypothetically, an intrinsic two-axis spin of a single-core aetheric monopole system could transform as a nested dual-core aetheric monopole system of a nested 3-sphere structure. Note: This nested 3-sphere structure is a nested dual-core hypersphere.

The effects of magnetic reconnections for a pair of monopole systems could be interactively simulated with this 2D Moiré pattern applet.

Interactively play with the applet to visualize how two sets of crisscrossed spoke lines could transform as a torus-shaped nested hypersphere structure with its visual effect.

Note: The intended optical effects for the above Moiré patterns, might not fully show up on different types of displays using different system devices, so for the best results it is recommended to use a desktop PC on MS Windows 10 viewing on FHD screen. For using the Java script-driven Java Applet of Moiré pattern, needs to use their recommended browser, such as the 64 bits Internet Explorer, and has to set it as the default browser for the Java installation. And after installing Java for the browser, has to add the URL of the applet to the "Java Exception Site list" by following the instructions in "How can I configure the Exception Site List?".

These spoke lines could be thought of as they are the aertheric vortices of electromotive forces acting on the two intrinsically spinning vortical singularities resonated in the dual-core. And with the superposition of the two sets of the phase-shifted spoke lines, the two monopole systems could be transformed into a dual-core nested vortical hypersphere, which resembles a nested torus structure with the overlapping of their spoke lines that extend isotropically from that two singularity points in their hyperspherical confinement.

In a nutshell, it is conceivable that their periodically manifested electromagnetic Lagrangian points in a nested manner, are intrinsically resonated at the vertexes of the crisscrossed spoke lines to spawn as the first generation of the putative 136 harmonics of singularities in replicas of the principle dual-core hypersphere. And thus, the cosmic aetheric structure of the dual-core vortical hypersphere with its resonated 136 primary harmonics, in the superposition reconnects their field lines as the vortical hypersphere of 137 nested 3-spheres of the cosmos.

This aetheric nested vortical hypersphere in its entirety is conceptually the hypothesized cosmic structure of the vortical hypersphere of 137 nested 3-spheres formed in the superposition of its dual-core vortical spokes.

This dual-core vortical monopole model could explain how the electrostatic repulsion force of the cosmic hypersphere is 137 times stronger than electromagnetism, which is the nuclear strong force that renders the fine-structure constant with an inverse factor of 137 for all the particulated elementary particles, and these are the inversely formed vortical hypersphere structures in the microcosms of the nested aetheric vortical hypersphere of the cosmos.

In a nutshell, this vortical hypersphere of 137 nested 3-spheres that models the cosmos, thus qualitatively unifies the four known fundamental forces of the standard model.

See the UVS topics on "The hyperspherical pushed-in gravity" and "The UVS reviews on the General Relativity concepts of gravity" that elaborate on how gravity could be unified with the three other known fundamental forces in the UVS worldview.

Click on the link to load the web page for its further elaboration on the vortical hypersphere of 137 nested 3-spheres.

This was the reason a team of scientists reviewing the UVS postulated cosmological model, had called it the Unified Vortical Singularity for explaining the model with their mathematical treatments by using the Navier-Stokes equations.

This was the reason a lecturer of a US Ivy League university had said the UVS model is valid for all atomic particles.

This was the reason a researcher who had authored a book on the isotopes and compounds of phosphorous, and had referenced it to the UVS atomic model, was organizing a team to further research all other atomic elements based on the cosmological model of UVS that postulates the vortical hypersphere of 137 nested 3-spheres.

This was the reason a physicist from a renowned research institute, considered the UVS research as a high impact piece of work.

This was also the reason a Canadian scientist had seriously reckoned that the UVS treatise should deserve an N-prize.

This was why a philosopher explicitly stated: “UVS is the future of science.”

This was also why a professor who endorsed the UVS treatise had personally invited me to teach UVS in his university.

This cosmological model of UVS also proved a peculiar philosophical insight of a renowned Nobel laureate:
“I have often made the hypothesis that ultimately physics will not require a mathematical statement, that in the end the machinery will be revealed and the laws will turn out to be simple.” - Richard Feynman

And this is how the UVS research is therefore a scientific revolution.

[Vincent_WF]

The most important aspect of the UVS treatise to fully appreciate the predictive power of the UVS inductive resolutions, is none other than the UVS topic on "The paradoxical effect of the cosmos".

Ironically, this was mostly ignored by many who have had seriously evaluated the UVS treatise, for they were more interested in other stuff such as the first principle of the UVS cosmological model, its predictions, etc.

The paradoxical effect of the cosmos is a subliminal natural effect that misleads people in its states of delusion with its naturally manifested negations. In the observable universe, this effect subliminally renders all sorts of natural cognitive paradox by negating the observations of natural phenomena in a typical obfuscated manner.

In the UVS worldview, the entire structure of the observable universe is intrinsically formed in a vortical system of the cosmos that could negate to obfuscate. All physical states of existence and the underlying structures of natural phenomena are thus inherently imbued with its paradoxical characteristics.

This paradoxical nature is subliminally caused by the delusional characteristics of the cosmic hypersphere, and it could manifest all sorts of subliminally negated circumstances by obfuscating the observations of the natural phenomena. The effect subliminally renders all sorts of natural cognitive paradox with its negations, and thus contradicts the actualities of the natural phenomena with their paradoxically rendered observations.

These cognitive paradoxes could be efficaciously resolved with the the UVS research methodology in its analyses of the subliminally imbued paradoxical effects. And these could be systematically analyzed with the UVS inductive resolutions on the empirical observations of the natural phenomena, which are subtly demonstrating the hyperspherical variants of the structurally transformed torus and their intrinsic vortical characteristics.

These are through identifying the various forms of nested torus structures and their inferred unisonal vortices, which are being demonstrated elusively in the empirically observed natural phenomena. They are then analyzed with the UVS model in its conceptual framework, which could thus induce the insights for resolving their subliminal negations.

This epistemic process could elucidate how the observational delusions in their subliminally negated circumstances, are rendering their cognitive paradoxes.

Heuristically, this can elevate the perceptions of an observer for the natural phenomena to their transcendental perspectives to know how the cognitive paradoxes negate their actualities, how they mislead people with their delusionally perceived observations, and to fundamentally understand how such naturally negated observations, have had subliminally led to their cognitive paradox fallacies.

For a more thorough elaboration on the paradoxical effect of the cosmos, it is recommended to read it on the web page with the provided link.

This was why a philosopher had written to me and said: “Without a doubt, someday your theory will be the way of science!”

This was why an accomplished scientist who holds more than fifty U.S. and foreign patents at then had written: "No person holds a complete truth about the nature of the universe, and UVS brings attention of scientists to an interesting path of solving this very challenging problem.”, and signed “With great respect, Vladimir.”

This was why a researcher who was into the string theory for explaining the cosmos, had said "I am convinced that UVS would give satisfactory answers to most of the mysteries...”, and had flown to the little red dot in person to spend a solid session with me on the UVS treatise.

This was why an accomplished satellite scientist had explicitly stated: “An intriguing website full of enlightening concepts and analyses!”

This was why a professor had handwritten “With great admiration.” in an intro page of his book, and then signed with his stamp sealed on it as a gift to me in person.

This was why a Nobel accredited scientist wrote to me to say: “Your work is really amazing.”, "It's raining enlightenment!"

This was also why some had commented the UVS treatist is a revival of the Age of Enlightenment in the modern era.

It did make my days these amazing people had shown up and could appreciate the UVS treatise in the way it should.

And I hope the readers here would be among those who have had appreciated the UVS treatise as they did.

[Vincent_WF]

Previously there was a guy advocated UVS on the Internet whom I was initially unaware of. He was telling his research community how UVS could be appreciated by assimilating the abstracts of its metaphysical inspirations. And it indeed was a different stroke for different folks to appreciate the cosmological model of UVS.

These inspirations are mostly the generalizations of its metaphysical aspects in the UVS worldview:

The metaphysical inspirations of UVS

"The cosmos is a vortically precessing nested inviscid hypersphere of an aetheric 3-sphere system with the superpositioning of 137 nested vortical hyperspheres.” - Source

“All physical existences are weaved in vortical motion; nothing physical is not vortical.” - Source

“The structure of the observable universe is a nested vortical hypersphere, which is being formed in the vortical transformations of a nested torus paradigm.” - Source

“All physical existences in the universe are unisonally weaved in the vortical motion of an all-pervasive inviscid aetheric medium.” - Source

“All physical objects are ruled by the motions of their resonated vortical singularities.” - Source

“Vortically formed aether corpuscles in the resonance of aether vortical motion in the nested vortical hypersphere of the cosmos, vortically manifest the subatomic particles, which are vortically coalesced as hydrogen atoms, which then vortically fused as all types of heavier atoms, and thus could vortically bond as all sorts of chemical compounds.” - Source

“Vortical motion of aether is the first principle for thermodynamics of the universe.” - Source

“Aether vortical motion is the omnipotent physical law of the cosmos.” - Source

“The local physical laws that govern the microcosms, are determined by the macrocosms of the universe.” - Source

“Aether vortical motion with the vitality of consolidating centripetal motion renders the orders for any physical existence, and its manifested vortrex with conserved energy in distributing centrifugal motion renders the chaos for it to evolve.” - Source

“All matters in the universe are impelled by aether vortical motion to maintain integrity for their resonated structural forms, and they are coalesced by the hyperspherical vortex spin fusion of aether with repulsion effect.” - Source

“All types of atoms are resonated to coalesce at various periodical cycles and angular phases by vortical motion in a universal spiral topology.” - Source

“All steady-state physical structures are vortically consolidated, and are held stable by a unisonal vortical motion.” - Source

“All naturally manifested chirality pair structures formed in Möbius strip topology, which renders their asymmetric left and right-hand pairs, are formed by the vortical motion of their nested dual-core 3-sphere hyperspheres.” - Source

“The isotropic hyperspherical vortex spin fusion of aetheric vortex that pushes in to vortically coalesce as all variations of matter, is the causality for their vortical spin radiation of different wavelengths.” - Source

“All sources of radiation for galaxy clusters, galaxies, stars, novae, supernovae, planetary nebulae, etc, are manifested from the vortical motion of aether in their nested spheroidal encapsulations.” - Source

“Aether vortical motion vortically pushes out all sources of electromagnetic radiation in the universe, and causes the spheroidal pushed-in effect as universal gravitation in its vortically conceived nested spheroidal encapsulation.” - Source

“Gravity is the vortical repulsion effect of its hyperspherical encapsulation.” - Source

“Gravitational force is manifested in the nested vortical hypersphere of the cosmos with the perpetual vortical push-in interaction of its aether vortical motion.” - Source

“The mass effect of matter is caused by aether vortical motion that renders the phenomenon of universal gravitation.” - Source

“All non-contact forces in nature are rendered by vortical motion of an inviscid aetheric medium that is all-pervasive in the cosmos.” - Source

“All states of matter and all physical structures are withheld vortically by electromagnetic interactions in different wavelengths.” - Source

“All matters are vortically coalesced as physical structures by the orthogonal two-axis spin of aether vortical motion manifested in the nested vortical hypersphere of the cosmos.” - Source

“All existences are zero-sum manifestations in the countervail dichotomies of aether vortical motion.” - Source

“Aether vortical motion is the underlying principle of the objective reality.” - Source

“All celestial objects are externally impelled to rotate and revolve in vortical motion with resonated precession effects.” - Source

“All naturally formed Solar System objects are being vortically coalesced in the hyperspherical variants of toroidal force fields.” - Source

“All orbits are manifested with the vortical motion resonant in the torus force fields of their nested vortical hyperspheres.” - Source

“The Solar System is formed in a planetary vortical system that has manifested in the vortical system of the Milky Way.” - Source

“The Sun is not the center of the Solar System.” - Source

“All Solar System objects vortically revolve around the barycenter of the Solar System.” - Source

“Paradoxically, the Sun does not rise in the east like it seems to be, it is not stationary like it had been believed to be so with the putative laws of physics that assert heliocentrism, and it is also not the center of the Solar System like it was being thought as with its conventional wisdom; nothing could be further from the truth than these false facts that were established in all sorts of delusion about the Sun.” - Source

“In a state of nothingness beyond observable bandwidth in the realm of the delimited cosmos, the underlying eternal light renders the undulating harmonics of vortical motion to manifest the transitory three-dimensional objective reality.” - Source

“In balanced synergetics that vortically create matter from an entity of apparent nothingness, everything physical in the cosmos unisonally evolves in a paradigm of vortical singularity.” - Source

“All matters and existences are harmonic vortical compositions of condensed light.” - Source

“In the observable universe, the nothingness of space is an intrinsic attribute of nature, and it is a prerequisite for any physical entity to inherently exist.” - Source

“Time has never begun, neither would it end, there is no smallest limit of the shortest moment nor is there a finite limit of the longest period.” - Source

“Absolute time in three-dimensional invariant space is a concept that transcends all physical locations in the observable universe, and has the characteristics of eternity, infinity and infinitesimality.” - Source

“Everything is vortically made of light!” - Source

[Vincent_WF]

The philosophical inspirations of UVS could be a different stroke for different folks to internalize the UVS topic on "The paradoxical effect of the cosmo".

These inspirations are mostly the generalizations of its philosophical aspects in the UVS worldview:

The philosophical inspirations of UVS

“The entire observable universe is subliminally paradoxical.” - Source

“The paradoxical effect of the cosmos causes cognitive paradoxes by negating the observations of natural phenomena, and mysteriously render them in all sorts of subliminally negated circumstances.” - Source

“The illusion of knowing in a delusion, is apparently real in its cognitive paradox.” - Source

“Without realizing the cognitive paradoxes that negate to cause delusions in the observable universe, the paradoxical effect of the cosmos has had fooled even the very intelligent people.” Source

“A paradoxical effect can consistently fool us with its cognitive paradox in its state of delusion.” - Source

“One can persistently fool himself in a delusion that paradoxically and consistently asserts his fallacious belief, and therefore persistently believes in what is not true.” - Source

“With lame logic and moot reasoning that asserts ambiguity, we can persistently fool ourselves.” - Source

“Ironically, we must not be afraid of being fooled; we are fools fooling ourselves by afraid of being fooled after we are being subliminally fooled.” - Source

“Any law of physics that suffers foundational crisis with any of its posits, would paradoxically distort its perception of reality.” - Source

“A pragmatical know-how developed with the postulated concept of its scientific model, is not by de-facto the proof for the actuality of its empirical observation.” - Source

“Knowing how to quantitatively predict a phenomenon would work with its model is one thing, how does the phenomenon actually work in reality could be another thing.” - Source

“Knowing how to make it work is one thing, how it actually works is another issue, and what you think on how it fundamentally works could be another story.” - Source

“Any physical law or axiom for the a priori proposition of an empirical observation that is claimed to have been conclusively proven by the quantitative rigors of its a-posteriori knowledge, is the causality of its cognitive paradox fallacy with its fallacious posit for objective reality.” - Source

“Despite mathematics can precisely describe empirically observed natural phenomena with its validated hypothetical constructs, by itself it is not the correct tool to accurately describe the actualities of the natural phenomena.” - Source

“If the equation for a universal law of physics cannot explain reality with its mathematical construct, it is not the reality is incorrect.” - Source

“Any scientific fact must leave no room for any rational doubt.” - Source

“Intrinsically, the quantitative proof of a scientific theory is not proof of the scientific theory.” - Source

“A tiny wrong assumption could lead to its huge misadventures.” - Source

“Despite quantitative research with truth value is an essential aspect for scientific works,
its qualitative analysis must precede quantitative analysis.” - Source

“Physics should adopt the qualitative studies of natural phenomena as its primary discipline, and then follow with their quantitative studies as its secondary discipline for developing their a-posteriori knowledge.” - Source

“Without qualitative proof, it cannot be certain on the validated quantitative prediction of any scientific theory is true.” - Source

“What one has undoubtedly believed as an actuality is one thing, what is its actuality could be another thing.” - Source

“An incorrect hard-core belief would insidiously corrupt all its perceptions that are perceived in its delusion.” - Source

“All delusions of the a-posteriori propositions that render the illusions of knowledge, are paradoxically stemmed from their fallacious posits.” - Source

“Delusion is the mother of all its illusions of knowledge.” - Source

“The fallaciously endorsed posit of a scientific model, is the mother of all its science delusions.” - Source

“In the paradoxes of universal delusions, advocating the subliminally negated actualities of natural phenomena, is inevitably a revolutionary act.” - Source

“By elucidating delusions, it induces the resolutions on actualities.” - Source

“The awakening from delusion is enlightenment; awakened from delusion is enlightening.” - Source

“The dynamics of Evolution are, Vortexes becoming Vortexes of Vortexes.” - Source

“By visualizing the underlying vortical structures and mechanisms, it intuitively reveals the actualities of the mysteriously rendered natural phenomena.” - Source

A duology of science and enlightenment: - Source
- Science without enlightenment renders hypotheses for pragmatism with the naturally obfuscated perceptions of natural phenomena in their postulated subjective realities.
- Science with enlightenment renders revelations for actualities with transcendental perceptions of natural phenomena in the realism of objective reality.

“By realizing the paradoxical effect of the cosmos, it enlightens on how natural phenomena could be negated to render their delusions in a typical obfuscated manner.” - Source

“Enlightenment on the paradoxical effect of the cosmos, enlightens.” - Source

“With the enlightenment, it could be incredibly simple and easy to perceive the actualities of the enigmatic natural phenomenon. However, under all sorts of subliminally negated circumstances, the state of such enlightenments could be extremely hard to attain.” - Source

“Nature could render us the inspirations for the insights only when we are hollowed out in preparedness, and has become truly humble with a pure intention to know.” - Source

A trilogy for the wholeness and integrity of knowledge, which rigorously cross-examines the actualities of natural phenomena with the congregations in a tripartite to form a consistent system of inquiry process as the criteria of truth: - Source
- Metascience with the coherence theory of truth, seeks and establishes metaphysical truths on actualities with the congregation of philosophical rigor in the nature of reality.
- Physical science with the correspondence theory of truth, seeks and establishes immutable truths on actualities with the congregation of qualitative rigor in the objective reality.
- Hard science with the pragmatic theory of truth, seeks and establishes unassailable truths on actualities with the congregation of quantitative rigor in the modelings of reality.

[Vincent_WF]

For those who could manage the vortical singularity hypothesis for its qualitative predictive power, you should be able to appreciate this astronomy treat.

From the UVS perspective, the hypothetical Planet X that could have perturbed Uranus enough to account for its orbital irregularities, might be caused by the interstellar barycenter of the Sirius binary star system barycenter and the barycenter of the Solar System; Planet X might be a miniature black hole.

This could explain why Percival Lowell or anyone looking for a planetary object would not be able to find the Planet X.

In the cognitive paradox of a Sun-centric Solar System model, the mystery of Planet X would not be resolvable.

A better chance to find Planet X is by applying the gravitational lensing method to hunt for a miniature black hole at its expected barycentric location, which could then be detected with its refractions of the stars that are known to be within the Milky Way, or with other known deep space objects.

Here is the inductive resolution of the UVS research for the proposition of this hypothesis:

Based on the UVS model, the orbital motion of the Solar System gyrating in its star system, is vortically inducing the axial precession of the Earth.

In the UVS worldview, a dominant long period torque-induced precession that is rendering on the Solar System while it gyrates in its star system, would cause the reciprocating long period axial precession of the Earth, and thus rendered the orbital forcing on the Earth with its observed gyroscopic retrograde motion on the axial tilt that precesses.


Precessional movement of Earth. Earth rotates (white arrows) once a day around its rotational axis (red); this axis itself rotates slowly (white circle), completing a rotation in ~25,800 years.

See an externally linked topic on "Sirius Transit Data" that reported on the rate of Sirius motion is synchronized with the axial precession of the Earth.

Karl-Heinz Homann had discovered the strongly interacting star system that induces the axial precession of the Earth, which is manifested in a gyroscopic retrograde motion of the Solar System in its synchronized interaction with the Sirius binary star system.

This is a significant discovery on the causality for the ~25,800-year axial precession cycle of the Earth. And it resolved the mainstream physical paradox that fallaciously predicates the axial precession of the Earth, is being caused by the gravitational forces of the Sun and the Moon.

From the UVS perspective, the phenomenon of the axial precession of the Earth, is mainly due to a two-body barycentric orbital motion with the barycenter of the Solar System and the barycenter of the Sirius binary star system.


The motion of a two-body system illustration.

This suggests that the barycenter of the Solar System, among other perturbations, is significantly gyrating with the barycenter of the Sirius binary star system in a ~25,800-year cycle to spirally revolve around the Galactic Center. As such, all Solar System objects should thus be subjected to the precession of their gyroscopic balancing acts that retrograde with the motion of the Sirius binary star system.

The empirical observations on the rate of the Sirius motion with synchronized positive time deviations, and synchronized gyroscopic retrograde motion, construe as a qualitative proof that the Sirius binary star system interacting with the Solar System, is the causality for the ~25,800-year axial precession of the Earth.

The predication on the axial precession of the Earth, endorsed with the scientific consensus for it is caused by the gravitational forces of the Sun and the Moon, is unsustainably a physical paradox as a result of its science delusion caused by its fundamentally falacious axiom.

“The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.” - Nikola Tesla

For those who wished to explore this topic more thoroughly, you can visit the UVS topic on "The axial precession of the Earth".

[Vincent_WF]

The UVS inductive resolution on globular cluster could be a fabulous treat for those who are very curious about the inexplicable mysteries in their astronomy endeavors.

Remark: The formation of globular clusters remains one of the main unsolved problems in star and galaxy formation.


The Messier 80 globular cluster in the constellation Scorpius is located about 30,000 light-years from the Sun
and contains hundreds of thousands of stars. Image credit: NASA, The Hubble Heritage Team, STScI, AURA.

In the UVS worldview, a globular cluster is formed when the satellite galactic polar vortex pair underlying a satellite galaxy, has had dissipated inside its nested vortical hypersphere.

Based on the UVS model, a globular cluster is formed by the transformation of a dissipated satellite galactic polar vortex pair, which thus released its vortically withheld stars from its accretion disk into an outer spheroidal-shaped torus structure that encapsulates the globular cluster inside its nested vortical hypersphere.

From the UVS perspective, the spheroidal-shaped torus structure in the inner sections of a nested satellite galactic spheroidal vortex, could be vortically flattened by its polar vortex pair to form as a nested accretion disk.

After vortically accreting nebulous material to form as stars in its accretion disk, thus formed as a disk-shaped satellite galaxy with its vortical collection of stars, its inner polar vortex pair when dissipated would release the accreted stars into the outer nested spheroidal vortex, and thus forms as a globular cluster.

Paradoxically, this is a mysterious phenomenon that amazingly was caused by a vanished satellite galactic polar vortex pair, which did not show its presence for its observation at the first place. This inductive resolution thus has methodically resolved the very elusive cognitive paradox that renders it as a mysterious phenomenon with this very subliminal negation.



When the vortically consolidated stars on an accretion disk in a satellite galaxy are released by the dissipated satellite galactic polar vortex pair in a freely suspended condition, they would then be withheld with the repulsion forces that are vortically manifested in an outer spheroidal vortex of its nested vortical hypersphere.

This process naturally transforms the dissipated satellite galaxy into a spheroidal collection of stars.

From the UVS perspective, a globular cluster vortically encapsulated by an outer layer of its nested spheroidal vortex, would continue to spin with the momentum transferred from its satellite nested vortical hypersphere. Consequently, without sufficient dynamo effect, globular clusters are thus not active in evolving new stars as were observed.

In the UVS worldview, a globular cluster such as the Omega Centauri was formed in a dissipated satellite galactic polar vortex pair that was impelled by the underlying galactic vortex of the Milky Way.

See an externally linked report on "Star streams reveal galaxy's dining habits" that suggests Omega Centauri is the nucleus of a small galaxy swallowed by the Milky Way.

The Omega Centauri contained several generations of stars as observed, indeed could be a dwarf galaxy many times its present size. And as a result of its satellite galactic polar vortex pair had dissipated, it thus could be more easily ripped apart and absorbed into the main galactic structure of the Milky Way. Nonetheless, if the satellite galactic polar vortex pair of a dwarf barred spiral galaxy such as the NGC 625 is dissipated, its stars originally withheld in its spiral arms would be released into its encapsulating spheroidal vortical hypersphere. These released stars if not ripped away could scattered around its nucleus within the spheroidal confinement, and thus formed as a globular cluster.

These empirical observations on the vortical hypersphere characteristics of globular clusters, are the pieces of strong evidence for suggesting a typical globular cluster is formed in the wake of its dissipated satellite galactic polar vortex pair, which was previously accreting the globular cluster as a satellite galaxy.

The cognitive paradox that renders globular cluster as a mysterious phenomenon, was thus resolved with its underlying structure and mechanism explicated.

See the UVS topic on "The vortical hypersphere structure of an elliptical galaxy" that elaborates on how a prolate shaped elliptical galaxy could be vortically transformed.

“By visualizing the underlying vortical structures and mechanisms, it intuitively reveals the actualities of the mysteriously rendered natural phenomena.” - UVS inspired

[Vincent_WF]

In the UVS worldview, a galaxy group is intrinsically formed in its intergalactic nested vortical hypersphere.

As illustrated with the first image below, a nested torus-shaped structure in the form of vaguely visible ring patterns could be observed to have had formed around the Cartwheel galaxy and the pair of two nearby interacting galaxies. These nested ring patterns were carefully traced out from its original optical image as shown further down.

This revealed an intergalactic nested torus-shaped structure with its nested polar vortex pair, and it encapsulates the three galaxies; this visualization suggests the three galaxies are situated in a galaxy group.

From the viewing perspective of the illustrated image observing the rotating direction of the Cartwheel galaxy and the rotating direction of the more well-formed interacting galaxy to the left, it suggests the entire nested intergalactic polar vortex pair of the nested vortical hypersphere is cyclonically rotating in the counter-clockwise direction.

Note: The vaguely visible ring patterns of the three galaxies were discovered and drawn by the author on the 16th of June, 2007. And this had led to the evidence that confirmed these galaxies are indeed encapsulated in a galaxy group structure.


This image highlights the vaguely visible nested ring patterns, which thus showed a nested torus-shaped structure that is encasing the galaxy group.


Optical image of Cartwheel Galaxy and the other two interacting galaxies.



“It is the theory that decides what can be observed.” - Albert Einstein

From the UVS perspective, the observed purplish stuff (in the above inserted Chandra x-ray image for the Cartwheel) outlined a vortex column of the intergalactic polar vortex pair, which is encapsulated in a torus-shaped nested vortical hypersphere. This asserts the interacting pair of galaxies and the Cartwheel galaxy are indeed withheld as a galaxy group in an intergalactic vortical hypersphere structure.

The cognitive paradox that renders the mysteries of the Cartwheel galaxy, could thus be meticulously resolved with its underlying vortical structure and mechanism illustrated.

The optical image of the Cartwheel galaxy in the galaxy group appeared as it is facing toward the Earth, but this is an optical illusion paradoxically perceived with its subliminal hints. This is an amazing optical illusion that is being naturally caused by its cognitive paradox of a nearer Cartwheel galaxy in the galaxy group with the depth information optically negated, and thus subliminally hinted to render its observational delusion.

The X-ray image showed the depth information for the Cartwheel galaxy, and has thus revealed its actual orientation; the Cartwheel Galaxy is actually facing away from the Earth.

This X-ray image further substantiates as the qualitative proof on these galaxies are withheld as a galaxy group in an intergalactic nested vortical hypersphere.

From the UVS perspective, the ring torus jet streams manifested around the nested polar vortices of the nested intergalactic vortical hypersphere, could manifest their furrows in the form of nested ring patterns on the nested hypersphere. These furrows compressed and smoothened on the surface of the nested torus-shaped vortical hypersphere, could thus refract and reflect the lit up celestial objects to reveal its nested ring patterns.

“When we looked into the heaven in the night sky, what we can see is a dark sky with remote specks of light from celestial objects that are visible to us within the bandwidth of the visible spectrum. If we can see ultraviolet rays, X-rays, and gamma rays, the night sky would appear as brilliantly lit up with the brilliance of these light rays.” (Oct 2007)
- Mr. Au Mun Chew, sidewalk astronomer, retired lecturer of the National University of Singapore.

Remarks: After Mr. Au introduced the UVS treatise to a professor of physics in 2007, and shortly thereafter in a 2008 public astronomy event, this professor in his speech remarkably had mentioned if his students in that year drew a galaxy without a halo, it would be marked as wrong, cited the answer had changed in that year.