Operation: ISON Barycentrism for Comet ISON enthusiasts

[Vincent_WF]

This UVS case study on the barycenter drivers of the solar cycle illustrates how the barycentric alignments of the major Solar System objects were modulating the past 24 solar cycles.

These solar cycles are shown to have had been modulated in an orderly manner by the four phases of the integral 3-body motion of Sun, Jupiter, and Saturn.

In Appendix C of the case study, it indicates the five negated quarter cycles, and also categorically showed how the officially announced solar cycle 23 maximum had occurred in Nov 2001 was a mistake.

Solar cycle 23 maximum had the highest sunspot numbers in late Jul 2000, and the cycle was in the correct phase 2 order of the integral 3-body motion. From the barycentric perspective, the correct date for the solar cycle 23 maximum is Jul 2000 with the alignment of Sun-SSB-BJS that had occurred orderly in the phase 2 cycle.

The UVS case study on the barycenter drivers of the solar cycle has thus proven solar cycle is primarily driven by the barycenter of the Solar System, the mass center of the Sun, and the barycenter of Jupiter and Saturn, which the barycentric effects of the alignments were being perturbed and also occasionally negated as a result of the two other longer period gas giants.

The solar cycle mystery that had puzzled scientists for more than 400 years, was thus resolved with the paradigm shift to a barycentric Solar System model.

“The Sun is not the center of the Solar System.” - UVS inspired

“Although his (UVS) model is lacking a quantitative method, yet he is able to predict solar cycle fluctuations.” - Dr. Victor Christianto and Dr. Florentin Smarandache.

More to come on the long-period solar cycles .....

[Vincent_WF]

Interrupting the UVS presentation of solar cycles to bring up this breaking news in astronomy concerning the distribution of long-period comets.

See a cometary discovery reported one day ago on "Second alignment plane of solar system discovered".


Artist's impression of the distribution of long-period comets in the Oort cloud.

This discovery of the second alignment plane of the solar system is strong evidence for this UVS predication on the long-period comets of the Oort cloud:

The UVS research predicates the comets in the Oort cloud revolve around the barycenter of the Solar System in a uniformly spread out manner are vortically consolidated in the two-axis spin of its nested vortical hypersphere.

Yet another UVS predication is being asserted, and this one took twelve years.

Check out the details fo this in the UVS subtopic on "The evolution of comets".

[Vincent_WF]

Such a visualization skill for inductive resolution to resolve the mysteries of the empirical observations, in a way was also practiced by Galileo.

In an era where astronomy was based on the geocentric model of the Aristotelian universe, all mainstream astronomers in that era believed that Venus revolves around Earth like the Moon. At then the extreme crescent phase of Venus had been observed with naked-eye observations, and it was also known that Moon and Venus shine by reflecting the light of the Sun.

Although Galileo through observations with his telescope had observed Venus did simultaneously exhibited phases similar to that of the Moon when they were in close proximity, he evaluated the actuality for the predicated orbiting path of Venus with circumspection based on the Copernican heliocentrism.

And after an extensive period of telescopic observation, then by abductive reasoning in its transcendental perspective on Venus showed its phase and size variations with a peculiarity, which can only happen if it was revolving around the Sun. Galileo thus resolved the physical paradox by elucidating its geocentric model delusion for the orbiting path of Venus, and therefore proved Venus revolves around the Sun and not the Earth.


Venus orbit


The phase and size variations of Venus

The foundation for the a priori knowledge on Venus revolves around the Sun, was first established by inductive reasoning based on the Copernican heliocentrism that intuitively invoked its transcendental perception. And then with abductive reasoning in its transcendental perspective for evaluating its observations, which was by synthetic judgment on the periodically observed phase and size variations of Venus as seen from a farther away Earth, it thus proved the heliocentric predication that asserts Venus revolves around the Sun.

According to the discipline of mainstream theoretical physics that is currently being reckoned by the vast majority of the experts, without any mathematical equation for its quantitative analysis, the research done by Galileo that thus had proven Venus revolves around the Sun, is not science in its nowadays practice.

Nonetheless, this Galilean research is absolutely well-grounded with the proven assertion that has precedential significant, and it refers to reality for how the observed phenomenon actually works; the proven predication that asserts Venus revolves around the Sun is indubitably an epistemic truth in objective reality for the actuality of its empirical observations.

From the first principle of this a-priori knowledge on Venus revolves around the Sun, it can then be grounded more correctly for developing its a-posteriori knowledge with quantitative research. This thus could enable its further research to be accurate on making the quantitative predictions for the location, phase, size, and brightness of Venus for its time-based observations observed from the postulated rotating Earth.

Not even a single formula was involved for this inductive resolution accomplished by Galileo, and the method had conclusively proven the a-priori proposition on Venus revolves around the Sun and not the Earth; its resolution was gradually drawn out that eventually established its qualitative proof with its corresponding theory of truth after the extensive period of observation.

“I have often made the hypothesis that ultimately physics will not require a mathematical statement, that in the end the machinery will be revealed and the laws will turn out to be simple.” - Richard Feynman

[Vincent_WF]

Received feedback so will touch a bit more on the barycenter motions of BJS, BJSUN, and SSB.



The animation was updated to show the dynamic magnetic pole change of the Sun with the closed-up animation.

On the top left corner of the closed-up animation, a bigger solid red circle means the Sun magnetic pole had flipped to become reversed, and a bigger solid Blue circle means the Sun magnetic pole had flipped back to normal. A red circle with an orange core means the Sun is in the reversed magnetic cycle, and a blue circle with a cyan core means the Sun is in its normal magnetic cycle.

Remarks: It is best to watch the closed-up animation on a smartphone so it could be physically rotated to conveniently track the SSB-BJSUN alignment at the 12 o'clock position. Rotates the phone in the clockwise direction a bit every time the animation changes frame. And it should be observable on how BJS cuts in between the alignment of SSB, and BJSUN would synchronize with the magnetic pole switch of the Sun.

Take note in the reference frame of the Sun that aligns with the barycenter of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune (BJSUN as a green dot), the BJS (as a red dot) in the animation had demonstrated it revolved around the BJSUN with differential rotation in the cyclonic motion of the gas giants.

When BJS was moving toward the alignment to be in between of SSB and BJSUN, when BJS and/or BJSUN without perturbation is/are aligned with the Sun-SSB alignment, they switched the magnetic pole of the Sun as well as made the turnarounds from the solar maxima.

And when BJS was moving toward the alignment at the opposition of BJSUN, if it was not negated when BJS and/or BJSUN is/are with the Sun-SSB alignment, they made the turnarounds from the solar minima without switching the magnetic pole of the Sun.

As shown with the closed-up animation, despite every quarter phase of the 3-body motion in this period manifested a solar minimum or a solar maximum, phase 2 of solar cycle 13 did not manifest its anticipated solar minimum. Heuristically, the periodicity of the BJS moving around the BJSUN correlated with every peak and trough of these solar cycles. This is also the case for the prolonged trough of solar cycle 13 Max with its phase 2 negation; the causality of this prolonged trough is vividly demonstrated with the visualization of this animation.

For SC12 Max to SC14 Max, it could be observed in the animation BJS took around 22 year and 2 month to revolve around BJSUN. While it took around 10 year and 1 month for BJS to revolve around BJSUN from SC 12 Max to SC13 Max, it took around 12 year and 1 month for BJS to relvolve around BJSUN from SC13 Max to SC14 Max with one negation for phase 2 of the Sun, Jupiter, and Saturn 3-body integral motion. The barycentric motion of BJS revolving around BJSUN is what modulates the integral solar cycle with the two cyclical magnetic pole switching of the Sun.

Remarks: It would be necessary to thoroughly investigate with an interactive barycentric planetarium application with the capability to indicate and show how the barycenters of the gas giants are dynamically revolving around the barycenter of the Solar System. Such an analytical tool capable of capturing and thus illustrates the alignments and motions of the barycenters more precisely with intricate details and resolved nth-body problems, should be very useful to correctly evaluate the barycentric alignments, and would thus accurately show how these barycenters with their occasional negations were rendering the ~11 year solar cycle and the ~22 year integral cycle.

By analyzing the motions of these two barycenters with a proper barycentric planetarium software tool to investigate with their ephemeris for the details of their motions, such as their instantaneous angular momentum and velocities relative to the barycenter of the Solar System and the Sun, it could explain even those minor fluctuations within the solar cycles.

The mysteries on the periodicity of the solar cycle were thus qualitatively resolved from its first principle.

This visualization method could induce the insights to accurately develop the quantity predictions with better precision for the solar cycles on the periodicity of their quarter cycles, half-cycles, full cycles, the solar peak magnitudes, and even the minor fluctuations within the solar cycles.

More on the long-period solar cycles later.....

[Vincent_WF]

Interrupting again to bring in yet another later discovery on the exact Solar System barycenter.


Detecting gravitational waves using an array of pulsars. Credit: David Champion

See these reports on "Scientists found the center of the solar system", and this "It's not where you think" that reported on the exact location of the Solar System barycenter.

This was the barycenter I was trying to hunt with the project "Operational: ISON Barycentrism" (named by DarkNeptune) by observing the passing of comet ISON.

Remarks: A 3D barycentric Solar System model with all Solar System objects and the major barycenters revolving around the BOTSS in vortical motion, is imperative for the correct understanding of the celestial mechanics. And as a matter of fact, the mainstream Solar System model with a static Sun postulated as the center of the Solar System is fundamentally flawed; it was fallaciously based on a cognitive paradox and therefore had critically suffered its foundational crisis.

At then in late 2013 I was trying to locate the exact barycenter of the Solar System by tracking the L3 magnetic Lagrangian point of the Sun with the BOTSS, and speculated on its possible location that extend farther from the Sun. With the known locations of BJSUN and BJS that were interacting with the actual barycenter of the Solar System, ISON at then was hopeful it could reveal the exact barycenter of the Solar System, which was speculated to be located farther away from the Sun than the barycenter of the Sun projected with the four gas giants. And it was expected that is not be the Solar System barycenter as postulated with the heliocentric solar system model.


A contour plot of the effective potential due to gravity and the centrifugal force of a two-body system in a rotating frame of reference. The arrows indicate the gradients of the potential around the five Lagrange points—downhill toward them (red) or away from them (blue). Counterintuitively, the L4 and L5 points are the high points of the potential. At the points themselves these forces are balanced.

Nonetheless, the later found SSB of the Celestia planetarium does seem to be mimicking quite closely for this exact barycenter (extended a little along the SSB-Sun alignment) most of the time with negligible error for wide-angle views, therefore it was still good for those shorter range solar cycles. It only breakdowns occasionally under extreme situations for the long-ranged solar cycle investigations with the much zoom-in views. Such breakdowns could be demonstrated with the closed-up view of the Celestia barycentric planetarium, and it has been very undesirable for the research to critically pinpoint the Grand Solar Maxima and Grand Solar Minima.

So yet another UVS predication is again being asserted, but this one only took near to seven years.

The UVS research predicates the elliptical orbit of a planet with apsidal precession is rendered by its vortical interactions of its star and the barycenter of its planetary system.

Check this out in the UVS subtopic on "The interactions of the hyperspherical pushed-in gravity in superior and inferior conjunction" that elaborates on this predication of the UVS research.


This is a Celestia planetarium chart for 28th Nov 2013 inserted in Oct 2020 for O:IB review.

This planetarium chart illustrated the quasi barycenter of the Solar System and its 5 Lagrangian points.

The Sun is not the center of the Solar System, so these projections of Lagrangian points were turned around to center at the barycenter of the four gas giants and the Sun for the speculation.

This quasi barycenter is not the barycenter of the Solar System, for it merely accounted for the mass effect of the four gas giants and the Sun; the actual location of the barycenter could be much farther out. This suggests the Lagrangian points of the Sun could be extended much farther away from what were projected with the quasi SSB.

Howsoever, the hopeful deflection of comet ISON gas tail did not deflect before the Sun on its flyby.

Note: The conventional Solar System model does not factor in the mass effect of the ejected charged particles encapsulated in the wobbling heliosphere, which is approximately 18 trillion times the volume of the Sun. This suggests the actual barycenter of the Solar System is not the conventional barycentric coordinate, which was calculated without considering the mass effect of those ejected charged particles that propagate in spiral motion at an average velocity of 400-500 km per second, vortically pushed away from the Sun in the Solar System to fill the entire heliosphere. The volume of the Sun is ~1.412×10^18 cubic km, the mass of the Sun is ~1.9891×10^30 kg, heliosphere has an approximate radius of 122 astronomical units, assuming the average density of the Solar Wind is 4.0 atoms per cubic centimeter throughout the heliosphere, the mass of a proton is ~1.6726×10^-27 kg. And therefore a very sketchy calculation with omission errors for the total mass of supersonic protons in the heliosphere is only roughly 1.70x10^20 kg, but this could have a significant precessing effect on the Solar System in an overall angular momentum of ~7.67x10^28 kg m s^-1 with its 450 km average velocity, and this is apparently not a minuscule effect. If consider an upper limit for the density of solar wind at 7.0 atoms per cubic centimeter as suggested by the other solar wind research, the potential mass effect of protons in the heliosphere is approximately 6.75% of the Sun's mass.

“The Sun is not the center of the Solar System.” - UVS inspired

[Vincent_WF]

The ~59.3 year synodic cycle of Jupiter and Saturn

The two types of conjunctions for Sun, Jupiter, and Saturn, are illustrated below.


Superior conjunction of the aligned Jupiter-Sun-Saturn with the barycenter (+) inside the Sun.


Inferior conjunction of the aligned Sun-Jupiter-Saturn with the barycenter (+) outside the Sun.

From the UVS perspective, a significant precession cycle that significantly affects the barycenter motion of the Solar System is caused by the near ratio orbital resonance of Jupiter and Saturn. And it takes around 59.3 years for these two gas giant planets and the Sun to approximately complete one synodic cycle.


The orbital resonance of Jupiter and Saturn takes ~59.3 years to complete one synodic cycle.

In the orbital resonance of Jupiter and Saturn with a 5:2 near ratio, for every five revolving cycles of Jupiter having completed around the Sun in a period of approximately 59.3 years (11.86 yr x5), Saturn will complete a little bit more than two revolving cycles (29.4571 yr x 2 cycles = ~58.9 yrs) around the Sun with a slight angular phase shift.

Heuristically, assuming Sun revolves around the Galactic Center at a constant velocity, in the ~59.3 years orbital resonance cycle, when Sun, Jupiter, and Saturn formed their superior conjunction with Jupiter moved nearest to its perihelion, with their barycenter positioned at the nearest point from the mass center of the Sun, it would render their minimum precession effect as a significant factor for decreasing solar activities.

And when Sun, Jupiter, and Saturn formed their inferior conjunction with Jupiter moved nearest to its aphelion, with their barycenter positioned at a farthermost point from the mass center of the Sun, it would render their maximum precession effect as a significant factor for increasing solar activities.

As shown below in the barycentric planetarium chart, there is a ~59.3 year synodic cycle rendered by the almost alignment of the barycenter of the Solar System, the Jupiter and Saturn barycenter, and the Galactic center of the Milky Way galaxy.



This peculiar barycentric alignment happens when Sun, Jupiter, Saturn, and the Galactic Center are almost in their inferior conjunction.

When the Earth is also almost aligned with this barycentric alignment during the June and December solstices, its torque-induced precession acting on the Earth would be at a maximum.

The planetary chart as shown, illustrates a recent ~59.3 year synodic cycle of the barycentric alignment had occurred in around 22nd December 2019 with the Earth was almost aligned with Jupiter and the Galactic Center during the winter solstice. And in 21st June 2020 during the summer solstice, the Earth had made the near alignment again.

In the past, when the Earth was also aligned with this ~59.3 year synodic cycle of barycentric alignment, much severe geology events had also occurred globally.

See an external link on "Sexagenary cycle" that elaborates on the sixty Chinese calendar year cycle of the ancient Chinese astrology that recurs in ~59.3 year.

[Vincent_WF]

The Hallstatt cycle and its quasi cycles

What modulates the Hallstatt cycle hitherto has been a mystery.

From the UVS perspective, the discovered Hallstatt cycle and its quasi cycles with periods between ~2,100 years to ~2,500 years when looking at grand solar minima and maxima over the Holocene epoch, are largely rendered by the planetary cycles of the four gas giants.

The ~172 year sidereal cycle of Uranus and Neptune, is phase-shifted by ~25.7 degree in the invariable plane, it thus takes ~14 sidereal cycles (360 / 25.7) of Uranus and Neptune to complete a 360 degree turn in the invariable plane, which thus renders a ~2,408 year synodic cycle. This largely renders one of the discovered quasi Hallstatt cycle; this is the barycentric orbital resonance of Uranus and Neptune.

The ~178 year synodic cycle of in 14 synodic cycles of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, render a ~2,492 year synodic cycle. This synodic orbital resonance apparently is the causality of the upper limit of the discovered Hallstatt cycle and its quasi cycles that oscillate between ~2,100 years to ~2,500; this is the barycentric orbital resonance of the four gas giants.

In the14 synodic cycles of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune of ~178 year period, 14 orbital cycles of Neptune with an orbital period of 164.8 year would render a ~2,307 year cycle (14 x 164.8). This largely renders the other discovered quasi Hallstatt cycle. This is the orbital resonance of Neptune.

The lower limit 2,100 year quasi cycle of the Hallstatt cycle, is apparently rendered by the synodic cycles of Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus; the ~60 year synodic cycle of Jupiter and Saturn in ~35 cycles (60 x 35 = 2,100), synchronizes with ~25 orbital cycles of Uranus with an orbital period of ~84 years (25 x 84 = 2,100). This is the orbital resonance of Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus that synchronizes with the orbital resonance of Uranus.

Over the Holocene epoch when looking at grand solar minima and maximum, the various synodic orbital resonance with different combinations of the four gas giants orbital cycles, have the synodic cycles of ~2,100 year, ~2,307 year, ~2,408 year, and ~2,492 year.

These various synodic resonance cycles of the four gas giants, thus rendered the Hallstatt cycle and its quasi cycles.

Note: The discoveries of the Hallstatt cycle and its quasi cycles were based primarily upon evidence of Holocene global glacier advances and retreats.

[Vincent_WF]

The UVS inductive resolution on solar cycles with its barycentric Solar System model, has had unequivocally resolved the causality of the solar cycle, the integral magnetic cycle, the ~59.3-year synodic cycle, and the Hallstatt cycle.

For more intricate details on this UVS inductive resolution, visit the UVS subtopic on "The barycentric drivers of the solar cycle".

However, this has just merely scratched the surface; much work is still needed for its further development.

Anyone who could work on the add-ons for Celestia to visually indicate the planetary barycenters, particular BJSUN, BJS, and BUN, project the Sun-SSB alignment, and also churns out their ephemerides, would be a good start for the quantitative predictions of the solar cycle .

I hope those who are following this thread had enjoyed the read and could glean its useful insights to better understand the actualities of the Solar System. And hopefully, the Kepler of the barycentric Solar System model would thereof emerge.

“The history of our study of our solar system shows us clearly that accepted and conventional ideas are often wrong, and that fundamental insights can arise from the most unexpected sources.” - Carl Sagan

[Vincent_WF]

This is the UVS inductive resolution on the 1908 Tunguska event. Its exploration was initially inspired by Mr. Au back in 2008 when he told me about the orbital resonance of the Solar System planets, and then brought my attention to the Tunguska event.

In the UVS worldview, the barycenter of the Earth-Moon system or its Lagrangian points when occasionally had moved to the stratified surface of the Earth and had vortically resonated with the material of the earth crust, could have had rendered the 1908 Tunguska event with its torque-induced precession.

From the UVS perspective, a significant barycentric Solar System alignment effect in their n-body motion could potentially bring the barycenter of the Earth-Moon system with its Lagrangian points from ~1.7km beneath the Earth to the surface.

An intrinsically manifested unisonal vortex resonated in the Earth by a torque-free precession could explain the geophysical origin for the 1908 Tunguska event (epicenter at 61 N & 102 E), which had occurred on the morning of June 30, 1908, at 07:14 Hr.

• The following salient points suggest the Tunguska event could be caused by a vortex that had manifested in the liquefied crust of the Earth:
  
  1. Among some of the discovered epicenters, the forest fall was found to have two closely spaced epicenters with trees fell in a clockwise arrangement within a meandering perimeter; this demonstrates the dynamics of a dual-core cyclonic vortex. A cyclonic force pulling from a void below twisting the ground in a counter-clockwise direction would have caused the forest to fall in this clockwise vortex arrangement. The peculiarity of this multi-core vortex characteristics had also been found in the remnants of many pit craters all over on the Earth, and they are clearly visible on lands as well as on sea beds.
  
  ......
  Directions of forest fall indicated there were multiple epicenters.
  
  2. The Solar System arrangement was triple crossed alignments of aligned Sun- Earth-Uranus crossed with aligned Neptune-Mercury-Venus-Earth, and also crossed aligned with Jupiter-Moon-Earth. Also, Saturn had formed the almost 90 degrees T-junction alignment with these alignments. These focused precession effects from aligned Solar System objects in a Solar System arrangement could have triggered a vortex of liquefied crust on the Earth's crust with the barycenter of the Earth-Moon system, as well as manifested the windstorms that reportedly had occurred simultaneously during the Tunguska event.
  
  
  This is the arrangement of the Solar System on June 30, 1908 at 07:14 Hour.
  
  
  
  3. The Tunguska epicenter is right in the middle of the paleovolcano crater, inside the Yenisei basin that was outlined by a river system as a huge dual-core geological depression; centered on a core at North of the other core in a dual-core depression. There is a bigger circular depressed structure surrounding the huge dual-core depression.
  
  When the surface of the Earth was examined closely with the satellite images, it revealed countless big and small craters all over Siberia. The image below highlighted some cluster of craters in Siberia that were found almost everywhere, the two large circles in grey outlined the Yenisei basin, and the circles highlighted in red are around the site of the Tunguska event at the epicenter of 61° N & 102° E.
  
  
  
  
  The Yenisei basin outlined by a river system.

.

• For the more in-depth barycentric insights, visit these two UVS topics:
  
  The UVS inductive resolution on the 1908 Tunguska event
  
  The UVS inductive resolution on the dual-core crater

There were more than a thousand scientific papers published on explaining the Tunguska event was as a result of a meteor impact. And many initiatives had been launched with government or public funding with high tech equipment for hunting the potentially Earth-devastating meteors.

With the barycentric perspective, you can be your own judge on what could have caused the Tunguska event as well as all those pit craters with the dual-core remnants.

“In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual.” - Galileo Galilei

See an externally linked report on "More than 600 earthquakes strike small California town in swarm around Salton Sea", and a video clip on "Perpetual Ocean" that shows huge clusters of oceanic whirlpools.

From the UVS perspective, such geology and oceanic events are vortically induced by the planetary tidal effects of the barycentric Solar System.

The hunting of the potentially Earth-devastating barycentric effects is as important, if not more important than the hunting of the potentially Earth-devastating meteors.

Can a team Singapore in astronomy rise up to this initiative?

[Vincent_WF]

I am reluctant to publicly post this series of the UVS subtopics on a long-range solar cycle. To this my apologies to those mainstream scientists who have been putting up everything for fighting global warming. And darns the paradoxical nature of reality has been messing up all of us.

A Nobel prize accredited climatologist whom I am in close contact with, who previously was on the IPCC panel, has staged her reputation on an imminent Grand Solar Minimum. So, be it flat or spheroidal, I should come out of my closet to share my views on this for its public awareness; it is critical for humanity to steer in the right direction to mitigate a global event with great existential impact on human beings.

From the UVS perspective, a grand solar minimum is caused by an extreme barycentric arrangement of the Solar System objects. This is as a result of the almost superior conjunction of Jupiter-Sun-Saturn has in overall balanced with all the other Solar System objects in a longer period precession cycle. Such a periodical planetary arrangement with the Sun approaching very near to the BOTSS during the trough period of a solar minimum would cyclically manifest a grand solar minimum.


Center of a star revolves at a lower velocity when it is nearer to a barycenter (+) with a small revolving planet.


Center of a star revolves at a higher velocity when it is farther from a barycenter (+) with a larger revolving planet.

The arrangement of Solar System objects on the 21st of June 1811 (as shown below) during the Dalton minimum, there was a superior conjunction with almost aligned Jupiter-Sun-BSUN (The barycenter of Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune). Jupiter was on the other side of the Sun from the other three gas giants.



The arrangement of Solar System objects on the 31st of March 2030 would be a superior conjunction of almost aligned Jupiter-Sun-Saturn and an aligned BJS-Sun-BUN. Jupiter would also be on the other side of the Sun from the other three gas giants. This arrangement could manifest a similar Dalton minimum trough level of grand solar minimum when it is synchronized with the trough period of the solar cycle 26.



The low-pressure systems of the extremely intensified nested polar vortex on the Sun that coincides with a solar minimum, is the catalyst for manifesting a period of lowest solar activities for rendering a grand solar minimum period. And it would be synchronized with the Little Ice Age occurrence of the Earth during the winter.

In the UVS worldview that perceives gravity is a hyperspherical pushed-in effect, the alignment of Jupiter-Sun-Saturn in superior conjunction with the mass center of the Sun being pushed-in to one of the nearest positions from the barycenter of the Solar System (BOTSS) in the planetary n-body motion, would reduce the intensity for the planetary precession effects of a rotating Sun when it oscillates very near to the BOTSS at a lowest revolving speed with its least angular momentum during a solar minimum, these effects thus minimize the intensity of the sunspot activities.

Remarks: From the UVS perspective, the atmospheric climate change on Earth is as a result of its precession effect with widened polar vortex pair caused by the orbital forcing of the Solar System objects with their tidal effects. These effects would manifest discernable cold climates in the low-pressure atmospheric systems of one hemisphere during its winter, and simultaneously manifest discernable warm climates in the high-pressure atmospheric system on the other hemisphere during its antipodal summer.