Suitable scope for taking planetary n moon

CCD vs Film? Lots of time vs no patience? Alright, this is your place to discuss all the astrophotography what's and what's not. You can discuss about techniques, accessories, cameras, whatever....just make sure you also post some nice photos here too!
Post Reply
User avatar
Jingguo
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2003 1:04 am

Suitable scope for taking planetary n moon

Post by Jingguo »

Hi guys. i would like to ask u guys to recommend suitable scope for planetary n lunar photography. Is for fork suitable? heard that fork mount can only reach certain angle only. thanks alot
User avatar
MooEy
Posts: 1275
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2003 6:24 am

Post by MooEy »

to frame moon nicely with a 35mm piece of film, u will need near to 2500mm of focal length. can try achieving that with either a barlow or simply a scope with lots of focal length.

for planets, find as much focal length as possible, webcam fits nicely here due to it's smaller sensor size.

choice of mount doesn't really matter, neither does tracking. since most motor drives can't follow the ecliptic anyway.

~MooEy~
User avatar
weixing
Super Moderator
Posts: 4708
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster

Post by weixing »

Hi,
Is for fork suitable?
You need to check whether the scope will clear the base of the fork mount when a camera is connected to the scope.

Anyway, for planetary astrophotography, any scope will do and tracking is always better. Can always go eyepiece projection or afocal method if your scope focal length is not that long.

Have a nice day.
Yang Weixing
:mrgreen: "The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance." :mrgreen:
universe24
Posts: 227
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 12:26 am

Post by universe24 »

For planetary and lunar photography, I suggest a telescope(any type of optical system) with diameter not smaller than 6 inches. The reason is we always interested in how much we can resolve for surface details and not how sharp a planets or lunar images we can get. Of course, you have to photograph as sharp as possible to resolve surface details.
Post Reply