I am actually more into nature than astro, since when I stay up late it will be in computer server room trying to earn my pay.
I would like to try digiscoping. But I am not ready for true SLR. I have Sony F717 (yeah big lense - big minus for digiscoping) but will be getting a Sony T5 soon (non auto but can take 1cm Macro photo!)

I will probably end up mounting F717 as finder and T5 with the scope.
However birdwatcher like to talk more about birds than equipment. Thus my posting here, :oops: and I do see some of the guys here has taken pictures of birds as well. I am thinking of a mak like celestron c90 because of chromatic abberation (more for daytime) :oops:
First is, how fragile is a Mak? It looks good due to shortness (I do not want to carry bazooka or mistaken as terrorist) and not so heavy. Not heavy scope = not so heavy tripod = total weight reduction. And I do walk around a lot.

I read somewhere that smaller mak, like celestron c90 is factory collimated and fixed thus no collimation necessary. True or partly true? :?:
Is it affected by humidity a lot? What about other types? (refractor, newton - dobson definitely out of question).
I have visited some shops locally but always get recommendation of equipment costing $1K and above. And always a refractor. May be they are upselling?
And not even ED lense. :?
Can anybody give me some advice please?

BTW, I finally see Carefour selling telescope, first supermarket in Singapore selling one I reckon. Definitely will avoid, after reading all the horror stories. :o
Aryanto