How would time and date be calculated if...

Having cloudynights? Take a sip of coffee and let's chat about other things around us. From food to games, this is for all the off-topic chat.
User avatar
Aryanto
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 11:41 am
Location: Toa Payoh

Post by Aryanto »

Blame the babylonians!
They started all these funny numbering.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylonia :beep:

But wiki teach me something new. That sexagesimal numbering is appealing not just because of the first 3 letter :mrgreen: which comes first in mind the first time I heard about it (sex-a-what?) :shock: , but because the number 60 is easy to divide. ;)

It can be divided by (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, and 30).
You may argue that 100 is also easy to divide, but it is NOT easy to divide by 3. And did you see the sequence: 2,3,4,5,6...
May be that is the usual number of children, or number of wife :?:
Not sure if babylonian practice poligamy previously.
User avatar
weixing
Super Moderator
Posts: 4708
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster

Post by weixing »

Hi,
Blame the babylonians!
They started all these funny numbering.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylonia

But wiki teach me something new. That sexagesimal numbering is appealing not just because of the first 3 letter which comes first in mind the first time I heard about it (sex-a-what?) , but because the number 60 is easy to divide.

It can be divided by (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, and 30).
You may argue that 100 is also easy to divide, but it is NOT easy to divide by 3. And did you see the sequence: 2,3,4,5,6...
May be that is the usual number of children, or number of wife
Not sure if babylonian practice poligamy previously.
Err... are you a bit off topics?? It's ok to off topics a bit, but please don't wonder too far away from it... =P =P =P

Have a nice day.
Yang Weixing
:mrgreen: "The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance." :mrgreen:
User avatar
Airconvent
Super Moderator
Posts: 5803
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: United Federation of the Planets

Post by Airconvent »

you're right weixing..its getting off topic and cc will definitely frown on this!
so I'm shifting it to the coffee corner where everyone can continue to discuss to its logical conclusion...
:lol:
The Boldly Go Where No Meade Has Gone Before
Captain, RSS Enterprise NCC1701R
United Federation of the Planets
User avatar
zong
Administrator
Posts: 621
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 9:41 pm
Favourite scope: 1x7 binoculars (my eyes)
Location: Toa Payoh
Contact:

Post by zong »

If there were 2 suns, we'd be nonexistent, so there wouldn't be any body to even talk about time and date. There is no known data showing that an Earth-like planet exists in a double-star system. The heat is just way too much, and the orbit for any planet that evolves (most likely a large planet of Jupiter size) would be a strange loop around both suns.

The time and date on Earth is really relative. Olden people chose 24 hours and 12 months because these numbers have the most number of factors amongst all the small numbers. Compare 12 (factors 1,2,3,4,6,12) and 10 (factors 1,2,5,10) and you understand. Time is in factor of 60 because it adds another prime number to its factors, that is, 5.

I did think of such a problem of double star system a few years back, but it seemed clear after quite some time of logical thinking that Earth cannot exist in such systems.
User avatar
wAi_kiT
Posts: 77
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:47 pm
Location: Ang Mo Kio
Contact:

Post by wAi_kiT »

Hmmm... for the current technology, there's only planets greater than jupiter are detected for other stars like binary star system. But could it be due to our current technology, that we are unable to detect smaller masses planets, since they detect planets by gravity effects.
User avatar
Tachyon
Posts: 2038
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 11:40 am
Location: Bedok

Post by Tachyon »

Currently, our technology is just beginning to detect planets around stars smaller than Jupiter-size. So I would still hold out hope for planets around double-stars. While it is true that the orbits of such planets, if they exist, would be erratic (and hence the 3-body problem) and unlikely to provide a stable environment for life, given that if the orbits of the two stars are very closely tied (so that in effect they behave as one body) and the planet far enough from the binary star, there is no reason to believe that *conditions* favourable for life can exist. Now, whether life exist there or not - that depends on God!

Cheers!
[80% Steve, 20% Alfred] ------- Probability of Clear Skies = (Age of newest equipment in days) / [(Number of observers) * (Total Aperture of all telescopes present in mm)]
User avatar
AGMI
Posts: 428
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 6:58 pm
Location: Serangoon Gardens

Post by AGMI »

:offtopic: about extrasolar planets, heres a good website, quite informative http://www.extrasolar.net/
Do You Believe That Forks Are Evolved From Spoons?
User avatar
Aryanto
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 11:41 am
Location: Toa Payoh

Post by Aryanto »

aryanto said:
If our solar system is binary star (2 suns) then there will be no life on earth. It will be damn HOT! (and you guys including me like to complain that it is too hot in singapore). So the question about calendar is irrelevant. Nobody there to use it.
zong said:
If there were 2 suns, we'd be nonexistent, so there wouldn't be any body to even talk about time and date. There is no known data showing that an Earth-like planet exists in a double-star system. The heat is just way too much, and the orbit for any planet that evolves (most likely a large planet of Jupiter size) would be a strange loop around both suns.
Yay, 2 vote! :k-lol:
User avatar
soulfrost
Posts: 167
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 3:58 am
Location: cookieland, dreamworld, North east Singapore .

Post by soulfrost »

zong wrote:If there were 2 suns, we'd be nonexistent, so there wouldn't be any body to even talk about time and date. There is no known data showing that an Earth-like planet exists in a double-star system. The heat is just way too much, and the orbit for any planet that evolves (most likely a large planet of Jupiter size) would be a strange loop around both suns.
technically, imho , we will exist. just that we'll probably do things longer, have shorter life etc.
I did think of such a problem of double star system a few years back, but it seemed clear after quite some time of logical thinking that Earth cannot exist in such systems.
earth can exist. say, perhaps have a bigger orbit like that of plutos if we obit around 2 suns? there isnt much that's impossible.
User avatar
zong
Administrator
Posts: 621
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 9:41 pm
Favourite scope: 1x7 binoculars (my eyes)
Location: Toa Payoh
Contact:

Post by zong »

There's such a thing as the (shucks i forgot the name) habitable zone? It's a range of distances away from the sun where the temperatures allow water to be in the liquid state, hence allow life to form. a double-star system will wreck this zone by making it an "8" shape, or even a peanut shape if they're close enough. A planet cannot have such a strange-shaped orbit because it will eventually crash into either star, nor can it be far enough that it orbits in an elliptic because a far orbit would eventually swing it away by one of the star's gravity. It's a die or die situation. Even if there's actually a far orbit that can be stable, at least part of the time Earth will not exist in the "habitable zone", and that means ice age, and civilisation can't exist either. That's what i think. Abit confusing, because my thoughts are always like that ^^||
Post Reply