Astronomical weather forecast
- Canopus Lim
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:46 pm
- Location: Macpherson
Actually, I think the forecast leans towards the negative side ...
Been out on a quite a few good nights last 2 weeks when the forecast showed 70%-overcast readings .... 
Yesterday's skies were so blue from 8am to bout noon but the clock showed 70% clouds all the way ...
It does give a good overview though ...


Yesterday's skies were so blue from 8am to bout noon but the clock showed 70% clouds all the way ...

It does give a good overview though ...

Jeremy Ng
C8, CR-150HD, TMB 80 f/6
Orion SVP Intelliscope, AstroSlew I
Minolta Activa 12x50WA
C8, CR-150HD, TMB 80 f/6
Orion SVP Intelliscope, AstroSlew I
Minolta Activa 12x50WA
Weather forecasting, like Stock Market predictions, are only an indication of the future based on current knowledge. I use it to plan my social life, not skywatching - if it says >50% cloudy, I plan for a movie. However, if it says <20% cloudy, then I will start preparing my gear but still watch the skies before I leave. :-P
(p.s. A bit off topic - thetno: your avatar is funny!)
(p.s. A bit off topic - thetno: your avatar is funny!)
[80% Steve, 20% Alfred] ------- Probability of Clear Skies = (Age of newest equipment in days) / [(Number of observers) * (Total Aperture of all telescopes present in mm)]
- Canopus Lim
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:46 pm
- Location: Macpherson
- weixing
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 4708
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
- Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
- Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster
Hi,
This is the link ( http://7timer.y234.cn/V3/index.php?language=en ) to the Astroweather panel... similar to Clear Sky Chart in the US.
I think it's the same guy and now even better as it's cover two millions cities, towns and villages over the world... of course area in Singapore and Malaysia are included.
Hmm... now, let's see "weather" it is accurate...
Have a nice day.
This is the link ( http://7timer.y234.cn/V3/index.php?language=en ) to the Astroweather panel... similar to Clear Sky Chart in the US.
I think it's the same guy and now even better as it's cover two millions cities, towns and villages over the world... of course area in Singapore and Malaysia are included.
Hmm... now, let's see "weather" it is accurate...

Have a nice day.
Yang Weixing
"The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance." 


- neoterryjoe
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 12:15 pm
- Favourite scope: c5
- Location: je ( 1.34, 103.73 )
wooo..nice tool
a bit confused though, about the colour code for seeing and transparency.
Seeing-
"The seeing here is a reference to the best possible angular resolution which can be achieved by an optical telescope."
So the more the resolution the better(white is better than blue)? Doesnt sound right to the inituitive mind - blue(signifying night sky) is supposed to be better than white correct?
Transparency -
"The transparency here is an integrated measure of the extinction of sky objects."
Measured in magnitude/air mass, so is the magnitude refering to the limiting magnitude or just a normal scale from 0 - >1? Seems to me the latter from the scale used. So the less(<0.3, blue) the better?
hmm.. maybe they should just follow cleardarksky.com in putting in plain english, transparent, not transparent.
Somebody has a clearer idea of this?
a bit confused though, about the colour code for seeing and transparency.
Seeing-
"The seeing here is a reference to the best possible angular resolution which can be achieved by an optical telescope."
So the more the resolution the better(white is better than blue)? Doesnt sound right to the inituitive mind - blue(signifying night sky) is supposed to be better than white correct?
Transparency -
"The transparency here is an integrated measure of the extinction of sky objects."
Measured in magnitude/air mass, so is the magnitude refering to the limiting magnitude or just a normal scale from 0 - >1? Seems to me the latter from the scale used. So the less(<0.3, blue) the better?
hmm.. maybe they should just follow cleardarksky.com in putting in plain english, transparent, not transparent.
Somebody has a clearer idea of this?
- weixing
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 4708
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
- Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
- Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster
Hi,
Have a nice day.
A brief instructions on how to read the graph is presented at the bottom of that page. Basically, towards blue is good and towards white is bad.neoterryjoe wrote:wooo..nice tool
a bit confused though, about the colour code for seeing and transparency.
Seeing-
"The seeing here is a reference to the best possible angular resolution which can be achieved by an optical telescope."
So the more the resolution the better(white is better than blue)? Doesnt sound right to the inituitive mind - blue(signifying night sky) is supposed to be better than white correct?
Transparency -
"The transparency here is an integrated measure of the extinction of sky objects."
Measured in magnitude/air mass, so is the magnitude refering to the limiting magnitude or just a normal scale from 0 - >1? Seems to me the latter from the scale used. So the less(<0.3, blue) the better?
hmm.. maybe they should just follow cleardarksky.com in putting in plain english, transparent, not transparent.
Somebody has a clearer idea of this?
Have a nice day.
Yang Weixing
"The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance." 

