Start small??

Here is the place to talk about all those equipment(Telescope, Mounts, Eyepieces, etc...) you have. Not sure which scope/eyepiece is best for you? Trash it out here!
User avatar
acc
Administrator
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 11:15 pm
Favourite scope: Mag1 Instruments 12.5" Portaball

Post by acc »

I have split this thread from its original Nexstar5i thread as it has gotten way off topic.

cheers
cc
We do it in the dark...
Portaball 12.5"
Takahashi Mewlon 210
William Optics 110ED
...and all night long!
User avatar
Tachyon
Posts: 2038
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 11:40 am
Location: Bedok

Post by Tachyon »

It's not the scope - it's the user.

I have a WO 66 APO for almost a year now and it has not even seen first light! I know it's portable and a 'grab-and-go' scope but each time I 'grab', I grab the 100mm instead. And I have seen newbies who lug their big newtonians around whenever the weather permits.

I guess it's not the size of the scope, but the enthusiasm of the user. With scopes such as the CPC, nowadays, the learning curve has become less steep.

JM2C!

Cheers!
[80% Steve, 20% Alfred] ------- Probability of Clear Skies = (Age of newest equipment in days) / [(Number of observers) * (Total Aperture of all telescopes present in mm)]
User avatar
VinSnr
Administrator
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 7:01 pm
Location: Andromeda Galaxy

Post by VinSnr »

Tachyon wrote: I guess it's not the size of the scope, but the enthusiasm of the user. With scopes such as the CPC, nowadays, the learning curve has become less steep.

JM2C!

Cheers!
There is a reason why most recommend a small scope first....mainly due to two issues......portability and wider field of view which makes finding things easier. I am not sure now.....but in the old days, portability and difficulty in finding things are the main culprit in killing off the interest. Of course, bigger scopes are really expensive back then. Range of available eyepieces also wasn't that great.

But I guess things are different now.....you have GOTO to help you find things, big scopes are cheap and getting a good scope is far easier now. Plenty of eyepieces for you to choose too.

I miss those days when people curse and swear simply because they couldn't find an object. Today, they curse and swear because some electronics fail and the scope couldn't perform. What a difference!
User avatar
river
Posts: 471
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Ang Mo Kio
Contact:

Post by river »

For me, I will start with something that I am comfortable with base on my financial status and mobility. Be it a 12" Goto, 3" refractor, bino or just a star chart. I am at the 3" refractor level.

Size doesn't matter as long as you have great time with it...
(except those toy scope!!)

I see many people here are upgrading and sell off many great scope at attractive price during such a short time(due to bonus package?). Really good deal for people to start off with.
alvinsclee
Posts: 299
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:21 pm

Post by alvinsclee »

Hi,
Portability is definitely an issue for beginners without a car.

To learn more about the sky, one needs to be out there as much as possible... there is no other way because the naked-eye view is not quite the same as shown in astromony books. Likewise, no planetary/lunar photo can beat the experience of looking at the same planet/moon real-time through a scope.

I am very happy with the portability afforded by my small 80mm scope and porta-mount. The setup and my 2 binos (8x32 and 12x42) have already been my trusted companions in several recent outdoor trips.

Audiophiles have this to say: "The best hi-fi sound system is the one you listen to most often".
Last edited by alvinsclee on Wed Jun 28, 2006 5:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Tachyon
Posts: 2038
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 11:40 am
Location: Bedok

Post by Tachyon »

alvinsclee wrote:Audiophiles have this to say: "The best hi-fi sound system is the one you listen to most often".
How true! And the best telescope is the one you drop most often and still stays collimated!

:mrgreen:
[80% Steve, 20% Alfred] ------- Probability of Clear Skies = (Age of newest equipment in days) / [(Number of observers) * (Total Aperture of all telescopes present in mm)]
User avatar
VinSnr
Administrator
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 7:01 pm
Location: Andromeda Galaxy

Post by VinSnr »

Tachyon wrote:
alvinsclee wrote:Audiophiles have this to say: "The best hi-fi sound system is the one you listen to most often".
How true! And the best telescope is the one you drop most often and still stays collimated!

:mrgreen:
Got such scope meh? the OTA made from military strength armour with IP 67 explosion proof rating?
User avatar
Canopus Lim
Posts: 1144
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:46 pm
Location: Macpherson

Post by Canopus Lim »

Andrew has spare scopes when his scopes drop right? :P
AstroDuck
User avatar
mrngbss
Posts: 900
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 8:27 am
Location: Bishan
Contact:

Post by mrngbss »

alvinsclee wrote:Hi,
Portability is definitely an issue for beginners without a car.

To learn more about the sky, one needs to be out there as much as possible... there is no other way because the naked-eye view is not quite the same as shown in astromony books. Likewise, no planetary/lunar photo can beat the experience of looking at the same planet/moon real-time through a scope.

I am very happy with the portability afforded by my small 80mm scope and porta-mount. The setup and my 2 binos (8x32 and 12x42) have already been my trusted companions in several recent outdoor trips.

Audiophiles have this to say: "The best hi-fi sound system is the one you listen to most often".
Yes, personally as a starter, having a portable scope is an added incentive to increase star obs.
Wee Nghee the Pooh
User avatar
river
Posts: 471
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Ang Mo Kio
Contact:

Post by river »

If only I can do it again, I want to start this hobby with a balcony facing open sky...

then get a good mount, 3" refractor and 5"Mak. Mak for planet and refractor for the rest.
Post Reply