Start small??

Here is the place to talk about all those equipment(Telescope, Mounts, Eyepieces, etc...) you have. Not sure which scope/eyepiece is best for you? Trash it out here!
User avatar
ariefm71
Posts: 2304
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:15 pm
Location: bedok

Post by ariefm71 »

2. HaleBoppComet type - They swing in once in a blue moon, make their presence felt, only to disappear for a long time before re-appeaing again later.
I guess I'm this type. I disappeared for 15 years! come back only after had enough fund to buy an etx (yes, I DO started small :-))
clittle
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 11:48 am

Post by clittle »

Tachyon wrote:I see this not just in astro, but in other hobbies as well - aquarium keeping, pets, flying model planes, wind surfing, hi-fi, etc.

Sounds familiar?
Boss, allow me to share a few experiences of mine. You brought up some valid points, only thing is...this hobby is not cheap to just make that damn scope into a white elephant!

Few years back, my son wanted to get into astro and he kept pestering me for a LX200GPS. I bought him an 8" LX200 GPS for nearly SGD$5000. He only used it enthusiastically for 2 months and he said it was too heavy. After that he never bother about the scope. None of my family members wanted to use that scope either. It is also too heavy for me. Today, the mount doesn't seem to be working and the front lens is full of fungus. My 5K just went into the drain. :cry:

Thinking back, if I had bought him a smaller scope, I wouldn't have lose that money. Far better to gauge his interest before jumping in with something that is too big for him.

Other hobbies can come and go...but this one is not cheap to just "go". If there is ever a chance to "go", might as well buy something cheaper and smaller to start off with.

Maybe you guys here are rich in the sense that it doesn't matter to just dump a few thousand dollars on a big scope and chuck it at a corner when you decided to just quit. But for most of us average income earner, I don't think being wasteful is something I want to teach my kids.

So I agree that one should start small here....esepcially if you are a parent and your kid want one of these toys.
User avatar
ariefm71
Posts: 2304
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:15 pm
Location: bedok

Post by ariefm71 »

how about... big AND cheap? :D
User avatar
Canopus Lim
Posts: 1144
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:46 pm
Location: Macpherson

Post by Canopus Lim »

Unfortunately many of these small scopes that people would like are more expensive than the big scopes. :)

I also started small, as I started with a binoculars, then went on further with a C5 then 8 inch dob and now the biggest of what I can afford and handle. I would keep mine for long long years and that is guaranteed as long it doesn't spoil and I have the ability to bring it around.

It is true that astronomy is a very expensive hobby of astronomical dollar; probably at par or could be cheaper than photography. Therefore, it is wise to continue it to the end or the investments will burn.
AstroDuck
User avatar
ykchia
Posts: 219
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2003 10:25 am

Post by ykchia »

Hi folks:

I derive much 'fun' out and get acquainted to asterism using a tiny 25mm lens +watec 902H.... over the years

rgds
yK
User avatar
Tachyon
Posts: 2038
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 11:40 am
Location: Bedok

Post by Tachyon »

clittle wrote:only thing is...this hobby is not cheap to just make that damn scope into a white elephant!
I understand how you must feel owning a $5,000 scope and letting it collect dust before it has been fully utililzed.

Unfortunately, that can be said for most hobbies also. I have a friend who works as a technician, earms $1,800 a month, married with one son, and he spent $10,000 on "Luo Hans" when it was all the craze. Now the aquarium is dry, the fishes given away, and the air pump rusting away in his 4-room flat.

What I'm trying to say is, in every hobby, you can spend the minimum or you can spend a lot. Prudent financial and asset management is the key. The question whether one should buy the best equipment there is or start with cheap ones and then move up has been hotly debated in other forums, and my opinion is - there is no consensus. It depends on your personality - some prefer to buy a low-end equipment and "try first" while others would like something "serious" to start their hobby off on the right footing. You can always find someone in either camp fervently defending their views.

When it comes down to it, it's about *your* own preference, not mine or someone else's. I do not think it would be fair to criticize someone who is just starting into the hobby and wants to own a quality (and expensive) scope, nor should we shame someone who wants to start with a "low-end" scope.

BTW, the people who are the richest are usually the ones most careful with their money! :P

p.s. Are you selling your 8" LX200GPS?
[80% Steve, 20% Alfred] ------- Probability of Clear Skies = (Age of newest equipment in days) / [(Number of observers) * (Total Aperture of all telescopes present in mm)]
Post Reply