First trial on my modified 350D - The Rosette Nebula

CCD vs Film? Lots of time vs no patience? Alright, this is your place to discuss all the astrophotography what's and what's not. You can discuss about techniques, accessories, cameras, whatever....just make sure you also post some nice photos here too!
User avatar
Airconvent
Super Moderator
Posts: 5803
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: United Federation of the Planets

Post by Airconvent »

Hi
Corrected your post so the link can be seen.
An ex-singstroian Tan Guan (who takes excellent images from Singapore) did modify his DSLR to take those images but have since moved to Australia and sold off his camera as he has upgraded to ccd imaging. Do a search for him and check out his posts.
The Boldly Go Where No Meade Has Gone Before
Captain, RSS Enterprise NCC1701R
United Federation of the Planets
User avatar
cataclysm
Posts: 1024
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:23 pm

Post by cataclysm »

Corrected your post so the link can be seen
Thanks Mr Airconvent!
User avatar
cataclysm
Posts: 1024
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:23 pm

Post by cataclysm »

now that your camera is modified, can it still take non astro pictures?
Hi Siahheng, yes you can still take normal daylight photography with the help of a front screw in IR limiting filter. However, the white balance will be more tricky to manage. Custom white balance is vital to get proper colours on normal pictures.
Instead, with the new found capabilities, IR photography will be more interesting. By employing IR passing filters such Hoya R72 IR filter on the pictures illustrated below.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Tachyon
Posts: 2038
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 11:40 am
Location: Bedok

Post by Tachyon »

I'm more amazed that you can find a clear patch of sky to take the picture! Kudos to you!
[80% Steve, 20% Alfred] ------- Probability of Clear Skies = (Age of newest equipment in days) / [(Number of observers) * (Total Aperture of all telescopes present in mm)]
User avatar
aquillae
Posts: 255
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 5:04 pm
Location: Lampung

Post by aquillae »

Nice Rosette shot!
It has some noise on it, I think ISO1600 + our tropical temperature is a bit pushing it.
I m using the 350D too, can you please post the "unaltered" 90sec pic (jpeg compression + resizing is ok) ? I've never imaged this object before and I'm curious about the amount of nebulosity on the "raw" image.

Thank you and clear skies,

Jeff
User avatar
cataclysm
Posts: 1024
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:23 pm

Post by cataclysm »

It has some noise on it, I think ISO1600 + our tropical temperature is a bit pushing it.
I m using the 350D too, can you please post the "unaltered" 90sec pic (jpeg compression + resizing is ok) ? I've never imaged this object before and I'm curious about the amount of nebulosity on the "raw" image
Hi aquilae, here is an unaltered image converted from raw to jpeg with compression. As you can see, the whole image is really red revealing little details of the nebula. The rule of thumb to get good images under our light polluted skies is to stack....stack....and more stacking.
If you are viewing this with LCD monitor, try tilting it at an acute angle to reveal the faint image of the nebula.
Happy imaging.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
aquillae
Posts: 255
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 5:04 pm
Location: Lampung

Post by aquillae »

Thanks Cataclysm, now I got some idea of what to expect in the future :)
great job on bringing the details out too.
jeff
Image
astro-cubicle :: www.astrojeff.com
User avatar
cataclysm
Posts: 1024
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:23 pm

Post by cataclysm »

Thanks Cataclysm, now I got some idea of what to expect in the future
great job on bringing the details out too.
Hi aquilae, thanks for your compliment. We all learn from each other. I love this forum, the guys here are really great , & full of wonderful people who are willing share.
Post Reply