skywatcher 90mm mak
- acc
- Administrator
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 11:15 pm
- Favourite scope: Mag1 Instruments 12.5" Portaball
What is included in the price of $500?Kelvin wrote:hEY, i just got an offer on Sky-Watcher MC90 selling about $500, any pros got a short story in this scope, ? is it a good steal ?
I had received a quote from a US dealer (Sights and Sounds) of about S$320 for an ETX90RA OTA shipped to Singapore via airmail (but he doesn't accept credit card, so u gotta fork out extra for a bank draft or wire transfer).
I think Chris paid about S$370 for a complete ETX90RA shipped, which is a great bargain.

But of course the advantage of buying locally is that you can hound the dealer should there be a problem with the scope

- harlequin2902
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:04 am
- Location: Singapore, Sengkang
For the price, assuming no mount etc..., I also feel that the ETX90RA is a better deal.hEY, i just got an offer on Sky-Watcher MC90 selling about $500, any pros got a short story in this scope, ? is it a good steal ?
Another thing about the Skywatcher MC90 is it's *very large* central obstruction. For those particular about image quality, they'll tell you that the MC90 will lose out quite a bit on contrast as compared to 90mm Refractors or other 90mm Maksutovs with smaller central obstructions.
Samuel Ng
- weixing
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 4708
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
- Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
- Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster
Hi,
Apparently there are two version of MC90. A f13.89 (Focal Length 1250mm) and a f5.56 rich field (Focal Length 500mm) version.
I think local and UK vendor are selling the f13.89 version of MC90 not the f5.56 rich field version, which can only be found in the SkyWatcher Canada and Germany website.
Anyway, the rich field version is the more interesting one.... Great for wide field low power viewing/astrophotography with only minor false color(according to the review in cloudynight).
Have a nice day and happy Chinese New Year!!!
Apparently there are two version of MC90. A f13.89 (Focal Length 1250mm) and a f5.56 rich field (Focal Length 500mm) version.
I think local and UK vendor are selling the f13.89 version of MC90 not the f5.56 rich field version, which can only be found in the SkyWatcher Canada and Germany website.
Anyway, the rich field version is the more interesting one.... Great for wide field low power viewing/astrophotography with only minor false color(according to the review in cloudynight).
Have a nice day and happy Chinese New Year!!!
Yang Weixing
"The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance." 


- acc
- Administrator
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 11:15 pm
- Favourite scope: Mag1 Instruments 12.5" Portaball
Kelvin, don't exactly understand what u wrote but if it comes with an EQ mount, than $500 seems like a good price. But whether an EQ mount suits u is something that you have to decide for yourself.
The big central obstruction/contrast issues highlighted by SAM ONLY applies to the F6 version. Its longer focal length counterpart is fine.
Anyway, I still advice the ETX90RA instead of the MC90. But if ur budget allows, I recommend the Mak127mm OTA which is avail from Mcgill at $850.
cheers and happy shopping
cc
The big central obstruction/contrast issues highlighted by SAM ONLY applies to the F6 version. Its longer focal length counterpart is fine.
Anyway, I still advice the ETX90RA instead of the MC90. But if ur budget allows, I recommend the Mak127mm OTA which is avail from Mcgill at $850.
cheers and happy shopping
cc
dude, eq mount, although seems like an essential for astronomy, can turn out to be quite a headache for a newbie to operate. I think you should really learn the sky first with a simple scope and a simple mount. If you want to jump into it, fine...but be prepared for a lot surpises and frustrations.Kelvin wrote:No, it with the mount. and a EQ mount, i like GOTO and motor mounts. cause they are more precise and easy to use. useless they break down which WILL be a headache ! :x
I do hope the motorswill last !