any reviews for "Celestron 1000mm F 11" ?
any reviews for "Celestron 1000mm F 11" ?
saw it on auctions and planning to use it for my camera but need u guys' reviews about it first....
- Airconvent
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 5803
- Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:49 pm
- Location: United Federation of the Planets
Scopes are normally quoted according to their aperture and focal ratio.
1000mm does not seem very realistic unless they are selling an observatory scope! If the guy meant the focal length, obviously this is not an informed seller.
1000mm does not seem very realistic unless they are selling an observatory scope! If the guy meant the focal length, obviously this is not an informed seller.
Last edited by Airconvent on Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Boldly Go Where No Meade Has Gone Before
Captain, RSS Enterprise NCC1701R
United Federation of the Planets
Captain, RSS Enterprise NCC1701R
United Federation of the Planets
I guess in any case, try not to get scopes as "telephoto lenses" with big f-ratios, it lengthens the exposure. But for moon , then big f-ratios don't matter so much.
Photo Album:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/14113965@N03/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/14113965@N03/
- Canopus Lim
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:46 pm
- Location: Macpherson
Looks like Celestron C90. Avoid C90 and all its incarnations. My Mak 90 and ETX 90 (spotting scope version) has much better qualities.
Photo Album:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/14113965@N03/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/14113965@N03/
You can PM me if you want to try out my Mak 90. Its still available:
http://www.singastro.org/viewtopic.php? ... highlight=
http://www.singastro.org/viewtopic.php? ... highlight=
The C90 as in the ebay link is the older C90 which focuses by turning the barrel. This is not suitable for astro.
This newer one is more suitable IMHO:
http://www.celestron.com/c2/product.php?ProdID=203
This newer one is more suitable IMHO:
http://www.celestron.com/c2/product.php?ProdID=203
- Airconvent
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 5803
- Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:49 pm
- Location: United Federation of the Planets
I see! Its actually the camera lens version. No wonder the guy referred to it as "mirror" lens. I have a Sigma one for my Pentax camera too. These ones are sold for photography and not specifically for astronomy.
The C90 is essentially the same as the astro version except it is provided with a t-adapter for attachment to an SLR camera.
BTW, the C90s are very compact but the central obstruction is bigger as compared with the ETX90, so contrast would not be as good. Overall, its a very portaball grab and go anyway but small aperture would not be rewarding here in Singapore.
cheers
The C90 is essentially the same as the astro version except it is provided with a t-adapter for attachment to an SLR camera.
BTW, the C90s are very compact but the central obstruction is bigger as compared with the ETX90, so contrast would not be as good. Overall, its a very portaball grab and go anyway but small aperture would not be rewarding here in Singapore.
cheers
The Boldly Go Where No Meade Has Gone Before
Captain, RSS Enterprise NCC1701R
United Federation of the Planets
Captain, RSS Enterprise NCC1701R
United Federation of the Planets