Swan and Helix from A.S.I.G.N.

CCD vs Film? Lots of time vs no patience? Alright, this is your place to discuss all the astrophotography what's and what's not. You can discuss about techniques, accessories, cameras, whatever....just make sure you also post some nice photos here too!
Post Reply
User avatar
Barry
Posts: 627
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 8:00 pm
Contact:

Swan and Helix from A.S.I.G.N.

Post by Barry »

Had another crack at the Swan tonight, with better results. Also did the Helix nebula.
Image
Image
User avatar
weixing
Super Moderator
Posts: 4708
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster

Post by weixing »

Hi,
Well done! Nice swan and helix nebula! :D :D

Any info on the setting and equipment used to capture the images??

Have a nice day.
Yang Weixing
:mrgreen: "The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance." :mrgreen:
User avatar
rcj
Vendor
Posts: 3043
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Katong
Contact:

Post by rcj »

think it is Canon 400D. Nice images BTW! Would also like to try Helix someday...
Photon Bucket
http://www.celestialportraits.com
Facebook page: celestialportraits
User avatar
zackae
Posts: 217
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 7:34 pm

Post by zackae »

Those pictures are really remarkable.
User avatar
Barry
Posts: 627
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 8:00 pm
Contact:

Post by Barry »

Sorry all, I forgot to give you the details on the shots...

Swan was 11 subs at 3 minutes each.

Also did the Helix nebula, 12 Subs at 3 minutes.

19 Darks at same exposure times and operating temperature.
19 Offsets at 1/4000sec
No flat lights.

Imaging train: Canon 400D on Skywatcher ED80. Prime focus at F/7.5 Processed with Deep sky stacker then cropped, labeled, framed and tweaked with Photoshop. Manually tracked with Celestron Nexstar 11 GPS as Guide-scope.
Post Reply