Sculptor (DSLR version)

CCD vs Film? Lots of time vs no patience? Alright, this is your place to discuss all the astrophotography what's and what's not. You can discuss about techniques, accessories, cameras, whatever....just make sure you also post some nice photos here too!
User avatar
Meng Lee
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:36 pm
Location: NTU, Woodlands

Sculptor (DSLR version)

Post by Meng Lee »

Hi, (especially to Weixing)

This is 15 x 60s of Sculptor Galaxy with modified 350D with R200SS and coma corrector 2. This is cropped because the full image contains very complex differential gradient due to high clouds yesterday. The coma in R200SS is totally acceptable with the small sensor of 350D.

http://www.singastro.org/album_showpage.php?pic_id=899

The problem with f4 is that saturation is too easy in our skies and with high clouds yesterday. Can't really judge the right subexposure yesterday.

Guiding with Lumenera is a joy. I never searched for guide stars. I always see many stars to choose from.
User avatar
weixing
Super Moderator
Posts: 4708
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster

Post by weixing »

Hi,
(especially to Weixing)
Ha ha ha... Thanks... :D :D

Nice image... :) By the way, what ISO did you use??

Have a nice day.
Yang Weixing
:mrgreen: "The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance." :mrgreen:
User avatar
Meng Lee
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:36 pm
Location: NTU, Woodlands

Post by Meng Lee »

Hi, Since yesterday I am testing the setup, I concentrate on capturing light frames. The ISO is 100 to avoid dark frames. No flat and no bias frames are taken.

Sigh, still scratching my head on how to determine max subexposure since the debayered JPG image does not really tell the histogram of the RAW image. And if you debayer the RAW image under the stars to check the histogram, its a waste of time!!!
User avatar
cataclysm
Posts: 1024
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:23 pm

Post by cataclysm »

Nice! Always a challenge to image Galaxies.
This is 15 x 60s of Sculptor Galaxy with modified 350D with R200SS and coma corrector 2
Wah! The power of big aperture!
Btw how much did you crop? Just to have a feel on the size of the object. Thanks.
User avatar
Meng Lee
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:36 pm
Location: NTU, Woodlands

Post by Meng Lee »

This cropped pic is 1432 x 900

The original pic is 3360 x 2218

Yah, that's why R200SS and VC 200L are scopes that I will keep for DSO imaging. The EQ-6 is really a wonderful platform. I did not do drift alignment. When wind blows EQ-6 has no vibrations. And GOTO puts the object in the field, the use ImagesPlus focus mode to centre and focus and can start opening the shutter!
User avatar
mrngbss
Posts: 900
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 8:27 am
Location: Bishan
Contact:

Post by mrngbss »

Meng Lee wrote:This cropped pic is 1432 x 900

The original pic is 3360 x 2218

Yah, that's why R200SS and VC 200L are scopes that I will keep for DSO imaging. The EQ-6 is really a wonderful platform. I did not do drift alignment. When wind blows EQ-6 has no vibrations. And GOTO puts the object in the field, the use ImagesPlus focus mode to centre and focus and can start opening the shutter!
You used Imageplus to focus, so you have a focusing motor as well?
Wee Nghee the Pooh
User avatar
Meng Lee
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:36 pm
Location: NTU, Woodlands

Post by Meng Lee »

Oh yes, the focus motor is called "hand". Hehe joking. Next project is the focus motor. Actually I have done it on my VC 200L, the orion focus motor fits Vixen RP focusers and FCUSB can control it.
michael
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:22 pm
Location: singapore

wow nice image

Post by michael »

wow, wonderful image taken with 350D. i will try to take but not at this moment due to no exp...at all...so i dn't hope at least for now. wating for some arrangement and learn some tricks about astrophotography.

nice pic....

michael
User avatar
Meng Lee
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:36 pm
Location: NTU, Woodlands

Post by Meng Lee »

Thanks for all the comments, next one will be VC 200L turn to show what it can do.
User avatar
rcj
Vendor
Posts: 3043
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Katong
Contact:

Post by rcj »

Hi ML,

Good attempt on the image. Was wondering if u see a dust mote on the top left, perhaps it could be removed using some flat frames. U could check this under Threshold in PS and move the slider to the left. There was some residual background gradients moving from reddish hues to greenish from left to right, again, it can be easily fixated by Croman's tool. Run through using fine mode. If still cannot, run through twice, it should be fine. You might like to run the data through LR decon process possibly with <3 iterations to tighten up the stars to compensate for turbulent seeing conditions.
Photon Bucket
http://www.celestialportraits.com
Facebook page: celestialportraits
Post Reply