Equipment needed for a Tracking Mount?

For people new to astronomy who want to ask those questions that they were afraid to ask. Receive helpful answers here.
Post Reply
opteron
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:04 am
Contact:

Equipment needed for a Tracking Mount?

Post by opteron »

From what i gathered during the astro trip, I've got some idea regarding the types of mounts for imaging and visual.

I've decided (if i can commit now) to go in the direction of imaging. So how do I start looking for a equatorial mount ? I just started in astronomy so i don't have a clue at all.
User avatar
vhuang168
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 3:13 am
Location: Sunnyvale, CA, USA

Post by vhuang168 »

It boils down to what telecope and accessories (camera, filter wheel, etc) you are going to use. You need to see how heavy everything is then find a good mount that will handle that weight comfortably.
All this will have to be offset by cost of course. But if you have a tight budget, my advise is to spend as much as you can on the mount. That is 1 of the most important pieces of your equipment if not THE most important. With a good sturdy mount, you can take pictures using ANYTHING that can go on it. You can always upgrade telescope/camera later and its easier to sell those than a mount.

Vincent
User avatar
Meng Lee
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:36 pm
Location: NTU, Woodlands

Post by Meng Lee »

Good to hear that after you saw how much stuff Remus and me carried to the trip, it did not deter you from astrophotography but instead made u take the plunge!

Yes, the mount is the most important. Recall how I failed to get the autoguider done. Its all because of the mount.

Good, strong mount with an autoguider port is the way to go. Avoid Chinese clones mount. GPD2 and GM-8 are the cheapest quality mounts.
opteron
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:04 am
Contact:

Post by opteron »

Meng Lee wrote:Good to hear that after you saw how much stuff Remus and me carried to the trip, it did not deter you from astrophotography but instead made u take the plunge!

Yes, the mount is the most important. Recall how I failed to get the autoguider done. Its all because of the mount.

Good, strong mount with an autoguider port is the way to go. Avoid Chinese clones mount. GPD2 and GM-8 are the cheapest quality mounts.
it's abit ironic considering i have back injury. i cant remember which 1 is u liao.
User avatar
river
Posts: 471
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Ang Mo Kio
Contact:

Post by river »

or take it EASY with Vixen photo guider GP2, also shown on the trip.

http://vixen-europe.com/htm/zubehoer/fo ... guider.htm
(non- english page)
User avatar
weixing
Super Moderator
Posts: 4708
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster

Post by weixing »

Hi,
IMHO, the mount you need will depend on your load. Below are some mount:
1) Vixen GP Mount (Mount Head Weight: ~4kg) - For load up to 7kg. 5kg max load is prefer for Astrophotography. I think this is the cheapest, good quality mount in the 7kg load class. In fact, with good polar alignment, I'm able to use this mount at max load to take image of 1 min unguided exposure with good result through a 1000mm focal length scope.

2) Vixen GPD Mount (Mount Head Weight: ~8.5kg) - For load up to 10kg, 7kg max load is prefer for Astrophotography. My current mount and with good polar alignment, I'm to use this mount at max load (provided there is no wind :p ) to take image of 2.5 min unguided exposure with good result through a 1000mm focal length scope.

3) GM-8 Mount (Mount Head Weight: ~9.5kg) - For load up to 13kg. A popular mount for Astrophotography, but (base on most review and comments) it seem like the mount performance is not very good "out of the box" as you'll need to do some re-adjustment to the gears before it'll give good result for Astrophotography.

Have a nice day.
Yang Weixing
:mrgreen: "The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance." :mrgreen:
User avatar
Sam Lee
Posts: 373
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 6:54 pm
Location: Woodlands
Contact:

Post by Sam Lee »

The Vixen GP Mounts are very good for entry level astrophotography use. You should benefit from the low periodic errors compared to the China made equivalent.

Regards,
Sam
We are the Borg, Resistance is Futile!
User avatar
vhuang168
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 3:13 am
Location: Sunnyvale, CA, USA

Post by vhuang168 »

A limitation with the Vixen mounts is the lack of an autoguider port. At least that is true when I was had 1. That was quite a few years ago. Is it still true? Back then, only mounts with SS2K had autoguider ports.

The Losmandy mounts (G11 and GM8) give relatively good results out of the box for most AP. Unless your image scale is really very small, then various short comings will surface. The dreaded 76 sec error can be guided out at most focal lengths.

Vincent
User avatar
rcj
Vendor
Posts: 3043
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Katong
Contact:

Post by rcj »

The GM8 that I use tracked fine and well...sometimes better than the G11...
The Vixen GP/GPD performs well out of the box based on tracking performance, but lack the greater variety in speed choice than the Losmandy mounts, which is a manifest of paying for what you get. With the DD1 and MT1 motor drive system retrofitted, there is no provision for autoguiding except for the usage of the STARBOOK SS system new retrofit, you can. Otherwise the other choice would be SPHINX from Vixen which provides autoguiding, but I have not seen plentiful users out there with successfive guiding performance based on the SPHINX system as yet. Both the GM8 and G11 worked fine out of the box. Not much tweaking except for the occasional maintainence and re-greasing, and then recent change to precision worm gear in the case of G11. Brought the Vixen GP out on overseas Austrlian trips before. Super portable but gotta do manual guiding back then for long exposure DSO stuff. GPD as Weixing has pointed out, will have a heavier load capacity, but is also a heavier mount than the GP. I have all four mounts for you to see if you wish.
Photon Bucket
http://www.celestialportraits.com
Facebook page: celestialportraits
opteron
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:04 am
Contact:

Post by opteron »

i'll ...err...do some reading up first..to save myself from some degree of embarrasment. :oops:
Post Reply