bit of problem with new celestron powerseeker 127

For people new to astronomy who want to ask those questions that they were afraid to ask. Receive helpful answers here.
Post Reply
f16_freak
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2008 1:14 am

bit of problem with new celestron powerseeker 127

Post by f16_freak »

hi all, new here.. been to mersing with Remus this March and it was an eye opener :).

Just got a celestron powerseeker 127 two days ago from science centre. All is fine, Jupiter and 4 moons, 2 bands seen. M7 is spectacular and for a beginner, I'm quite satisfied. Viewfinder as many mentioned can be improved.

However, I'm not really familiar with the polar alignment thing and though I've played around a bit, realised that cos Singapore's near the equator, latitude is 1 so the scope is parallel to the ground, the COUNTERWEIGHTS actually hit the TRIPOD when moving in right ascension?!

can someone enlighten me on this esp pple who have used this scope before. am I missing anything?

thanks and clear skies.
User avatar
weixing
Super Moderator
Posts: 4708
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster

Post by weixing »

Hi,
Most equatorial mount had this issue when use in equator, that's why some of those equatorial mount have a half-pier to raise the height of the mount head, so that the counter-weight will clear the tripod leg.

Anyway, not a serious issue for visual... just increase the latitude until it can clear the tripod leg.

By the way, welcome to SingAstro!

Have a nice day and happy obbing!
Yang Weixing
:mrgreen: "The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance." :mrgreen:
User avatar
Airconvent
Super Moderator
Posts: 5804
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: United Federation of the Planets

Post by Airconvent »

that is why I avoid equatorial mounts like the plague.
they are useful for astrophotgraphy because of their potential tracking accuracy but for visual, a forkmount or alt-azimuth mount is more practical, lighter and cheaper too!
The Boldly Go Where No Meade Has Gone Before
Captain, RSS Enterprise NCC1701R
United Federation of the Planets
User avatar
weixing
Super Moderator
Posts: 4708
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster

Post by weixing »

Hi,
IMHO, it's best for beginner to start off with equatorial mount:
1) When learning how to use an equatorial mount, he'll have a good understanding of the equatorial coordinate system which is the most widely used celestial coordinate system.

2) Star hopping using star chart with equatorial mount is easier than using an Alt-Az mount... you can follow the RA or DEC axis to your target.

3) An equatorial mount is usually better built and more usable than Alt-Az mount in those low cost telescope package.

4) Manual tracking is also easier than those low cost Alt-Az mount.

5) Easier and lower cost to motorized it than Alt-Az mount.

Have a nice day.
Yang Weixing
:mrgreen: "The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance." :mrgreen:
f16_freak
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2008 1:14 am

Post by f16_freak »

thanks for your opinions:)

indeed i've better understood the coordinate system though i have yet to try it out. as this is my first scope, couldnt ask for too much i guess.

is it practical to do astrophotog with such a scope(5 insch)? wasnt what i intended to do with the scope but realising the camera sees more than our eyes got me excited haha.

btw spotted m22 ytd as a very vague blur patch. a personal achievement! still waiting for a clear evening.
User avatar
acc
Administrator
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 11:15 pm
Favourite scope: Mag1 Instruments 12.5" Portaball

Post by acc »

Welcome to Singastro and have fun!
We do it in the dark...
Portaball 12.5"
Takahashi Mewlon 210
William Optics 110ED
...and all night long!
Post Reply