what to do to get a telescope?

For people new to astronomy who want to ask those questions that they were afraid to ask. Receive helpful answers here.
User avatar
rlow
Posts: 2404
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:36 pm
Location: Jurong

Post by rlow »

The 10" was good but with no tracking not so much fun for planets or small DSO's like planetary nebulae. I would imagine that with the light pollution large DSO's are out of the question anyway.. what's the use of unused aperture right? :-)
Welcome Orly. My Mom is from Manila, so we have something in common.

My 11" f/5 dob can be easily hand-tracked at 200-300x. I have also managed to hand-track the Ring Nebula at 686x on Andrew's 15" Obsession. So, with a properly built dob mount with smooth motions, I believe your 10" f/5 mirror can be put to good use. I am building some dobs here, you can check it out next time when its done.

We have observed many DSOs through a 10" scope here in Singapore despite the light pollution. For a better view of DSOs, some of us drive 100km into Malaysia on a monthly basis.
One other possibility (I'm all over the place!) is the Vixen BT-70. I used to want the Fujinon 10x70 FMT-SX but realized that without 45- or 90-degree eyepieces your neck will eventually kill you. Downside of the BT-70 is it can't do high mag very well, and with light pollution planets are your friend :-)
You probably mean the Vixen BT-80MA (you can do a search here to view the photos), which I have used from 25x to 90x magnification. For planetary observations with both eyes, I would prefer a premium scope with bino-viewer.
rlow
User avatar
orly_andico
Posts: 1616
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:14 pm
Location: Braddell Heights
Contact:

Post by orly_andico »

hi Richard,

that's the key.. good mechanicals are a must on a dob. Mine did not have these (I just ordered ebony star a year ago for the Nth rebuild... which never happened).

also my 10" mirror is a Guan Sheng, not a Royce or anything like that.

regarding the BT-70 (there is such a thing now... cheaper than the BT-80MA) I was thinking more of use for low powers. It's not very good for much over 90X due to the difficulty of maintaining collimation.

I'm really leaning toward an ETX-125 or Nexstar 5. It costs 1/2 of a 10" Royce mirror :-)

It should be apparent from my leanings that my budget is around the $700 - $800 (USD) range. Since buying a scope in SG is hopeless, I'm planning to have it sent to the Philippines and hand-carry it on my next trip to Manila. US-PH shipping is cheap because of VPost-like services due to the large Filipino expatriate community in the US.
User avatar
weixing
Super Moderator
Posts: 4708
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster

Post by weixing »

Hi,
orly_andico wrote: also my 10" mirror is a Guan Sheng, not a Royce or anything like that.
IMHO, Guan Sheng mirror is not that bad la... and you don't need a Royce mirror to blow most (if not all) 5" scope out of water... what a 10" mirror had regardless of brand (as long as it's a decent mirror), is raw light gathering power and resolution. :mrgreen:

Good luck in your telescope purchase.

Have a nice day.
Yang Weixing
:mrgreen: "The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance." :mrgreen:
User avatar
orly_andico
Posts: 1616
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:14 pm
Location: Braddell Heights
Contact:

Post by orly_andico »

Thanks for the advice. :-)

Perhaps I will keep the 10" mirror for now. I was trolling in Digi-Key and found this 1 RPM DC motor for $75 SGD. I think I will retrofit that to my EQ-1 clone and try to do some astrophotography. The EQ-1 clone has horrific PE but am thinking of just using a 200mm lens, 15-second exposures, and stacking like crazy.

There's some software now that can even correct for field rotation..
User avatar
rlow
Posts: 2404
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:36 pm
Location: Jurong

Post by rlow »

regarding the BT-70 (there is such a thing now... cheaper than the BT-80MA) I was thinking more of use for low powers. It's not very good for much over 90X due to the difficulty of maintaining collimation.
I think you mean Orion BT70 which has been around for a while, which in your earlier post you stated as "Vixen" BT70, which Vixen does not have. The quality of the Orion BT70 is not on par with the Vixen BT80MA.
rlow
Post Reply