Hi,
I started imaging in Singapore in alt-az mode with a LX200 12".
One minute images with a SBIG ST8 are fine.
I took up to 60 images, 1 minute each and then rotated and combined them (using CCDSoft). It is a bit tiring but it works fine.
This M101 was imaged using this setup : http://www.geocities.com/jybeninger/dee ... 030330.jpg
I then purchased a used field derotator on Astromart. It took me one year to make it work.
The final problem was software related. I contacted Meade, sent them my observations and they finally solved it in Autostar II version 1.7i .
Now that it works, I see no rotation whatsoever with 10 minutes images. In stacks of several such shots, I have no rotation as well.
If you want to see how it looks inside and how it works :
http://www.geocities.com/jybeninger/derot.html
Cheers
Jean-Yves
Meade field derotator
-
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 10:06 pm
- Location: Braddell
- Contact:
- Airconvent
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 5804
- Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:49 pm
- Location: United Federation of the Planets
Hi Rich,
Thanks for the kind comment : in fact, I had my LX200 supercharged by Dr Clay himself...
With the often cloudy weather, I think I have spent more time twicking the inside of my stuff than looking through it !
I would be glad to help if anyone here has some tech problem ... reminds me that I promised Chris to check his mirror lock ... Chris, are you in town this week ? (you can email me at jy"at"lesbeninger.com )
Cheers
Jean-Yves
Thanks for the kind comment : in fact, I had my LX200 supercharged by Dr Clay himself...
With the often cloudy weather, I think I have spent more time twicking the inside of my stuff than looking through it !
I would be glad to help if anyone here has some tech problem ... reminds me that I promised Chris to check his mirror lock ... Chris, are you in town this week ? (you can email me at jy"at"lesbeninger.com )
Cheers
Jean-Yves
Correct, the rotation I talk about is absent in GEM.
Cheers
Jean-Yves
Cheers
Jean-Yves
Last edited by JY on Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Don't worry, in twenty years time I am sure you'll have a better setting if you keep the passion !
The ST8 is a very good CCD : lots of small pixels !
Even at bin 2x2, the resolution is very good and the image size is still decent.
It captures the faintest light and I get down to magnitude 16 in one minute shots here, in Singapore...
I chose the model NABG (non anti blooming) : you can determine the magnitude of stars with these models and do some science projects.
Buy it on Astromart, and if you want to change it, you can sell it at the same price.
I am using a four years old Acer laptop, normal specs, nothing extraordinary.
Cheers
Jean-Yves
The ST8 is a very good CCD : lots of small pixels !
Even at bin 2x2, the resolution is very good and the image size is still decent.
It captures the faintest light and I get down to magnitude 16 in one minute shots here, in Singapore...
I chose the model NABG (non anti blooming) : you can determine the magnitude of stars with these models and do some science projects.
Buy it on Astromart, and if you want to change it, you can sell it at the same price.
I am using a four years old Acer laptop, normal specs, nothing extraordinary.
Cheers
Jean-Yves
Yes, NABG can create problems with bright stars.
You then have to take shorter exposure images and stack them or use a "deblooming" tool which is a paint brush tool ... only for cosmetics.
A few 16 and 17 mag supernovae imaged from Yo Chu Kang last year : http://www.geocities.com/jybeninger/supernova.html
You then have to take shorter exposure images and stack them or use a "deblooming" tool which is a paint brush tool ... only for cosmetics.
A few 16 and 17 mag supernovae imaged from Yo Chu Kang last year : http://www.geocities.com/jybeninger/supernova.html