You don't even need a tracking mount! Check this out...Pentax is offering the O-GPS1 module that has this ASTROTRACER function and does correction for star movement, in short, it tracks by utilizing in-body image stabilization to get pin-point stars.
http://www.imaging-resource.com/NEWS/1307021455.html
ASTROTRACER Function for Pentax DSLRs
- orly_andico
- Posts: 1616
- Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:14 pm
- Location: Braddell Heights
- Contact:
I missed that feature! Suddenly I am looking at this item again. No wonder it is so large compared to the GPS units of other camera manufacturers!
[80% Steve, 20% Alfred] ------- Probability of Clear Skies = (Age of newest equipment in days) / [(Number of observers) * (Total Aperture of all telescopes present in mm)]
- Airconvent
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 5803
- Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:49 pm
- Location: United Federation of the Planets
-
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:21 pm
- weixing
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 4708
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
- Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
- Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster
Hi,
The idea is good, but wonder will it work as good as it advertise?? I think there might be some limitation, such as the usable field will be a lot smaller than your lens field of view. Below are two issues that I think might cause problem:
1) If your lens is not flat, not sharp across the field and had distortion, the result might not be good... most lens had this problem especially obvious on pin point objects, such as stars.
2) During the exposure, new stars will be entering the field of view of your lens and some stars will be leaving... only those stars that are inside the field of view and inside the lens distortion free area during the whole exposure will be usable... As a result, the usable field of view might be very small.
Hmm... I think it'll work better if the IS is on the lens...
Have a nice day.
The idea is good, but wonder will it work as good as it advertise?? I think there might be some limitation, such as the usable field will be a lot smaller than your lens field of view. Below are two issues that I think might cause problem:
1) If your lens is not flat, not sharp across the field and had distortion, the result might not be good... most lens had this problem especially obvious on pin point objects, such as stars.
2) During the exposure, new stars will be entering the field of view of your lens and some stars will be leaving... only those stars that are inside the field of view and inside the lens distortion free area during the whole exposure will be usable... As a result, the usable field of view might be very small.
Hmm... I think it'll work better if the IS is on the lens...
![confused [smilie=confused.gif]](./images/smilies/confused.gif)
Have a nice day.
Yang Weixing
"The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance." 

