My journey has began

For people new to astronomy who want to ask those questions that they were afraid to ask. Receive helpful answers here.
User avatar
Airconvent
Super Moderator
Posts: 5803
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: United Federation of the Planets

Post by Airconvent »

Good effort bro and from a first timer too! [smilie=crying2.gif]
The Boldly Go Where No Meade Has Gone Before
Captain, RSS Enterprise NCC1701R
United Federation of the Planets
User avatar
cloud_cover
Posts: 1170
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:08 pm
Favourite scope: 94.5", f/24 Ritchey-Chretien Reflector
Location: Restaurant At the End of the Universe

Post by cloud_cover »

I have a spare Televue SCT to 2" adapter. PM sent :)
DON'T PANIC
User avatar
orly_andico
Posts: 1616
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:14 pm
Location: Braddell Heights
Contact:

Post by orly_andico »

could still be some slop in the T-adapter.. i'd check that out first. i've never tried sticking a DSLR onto the back of my C9.25 (I'm not a glutton for punishment, imaging at such a long focal length is bound to be extremely challenging)
User avatar
cloud_cover
Posts: 1170
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:08 pm
Favourite scope: 94.5", f/24 Ritchey-Chretien Reflector
Location: Restaurant At the End of the Universe

Post by cloud_cover »

And there I am thinking of trying BOTH off-axis guiding and imaging with a 2000mm f/10 scope......
DON'T PANIC
User avatar
kaomoo
Posts: 149
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 10:49 am
Location: Pasir Panjang

Post by kaomoo »

Image

hi guys
opinion

i reshot the moon today... still feels the the relief is sharper on one side than the other side...

though i am starting to think it's not focus issue, but direction of shadow?
User avatar
kaomoo
Posts: 149
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 10:49 am
Location: Pasir Panjang

Post by kaomoo »

and yes, i think i need a micro focuser....

this is sweet.....

Image
User avatar
Gary
Posts: 3790
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 7:06 am
Location: Toa Payoh
Contact:

Post by Gary »

http://www.astro.sg
email: gary[at]astro.sg
twitter: @astrosg


"The importance of a telescope is not how big it is, how well made it is.
It is how many people, less fortunate than you, got to look through it."
-- John Dobson.
User avatar
cloud_cover
Posts: 1170
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:08 pm
Favourite scope: 94.5", f/24 Ritchey-Chretien Reflector
Location: Restaurant At the End of the Universe

Post by cloud_cover »

Focus is always an issue when taking pics - the problem is that the viewfinder on the DSLR is often not good enough for the low-light enviornment of astronomy.
One way is to boost the magnification of your liveview to max and judge from there.
Another way is to focus on a nearby bright star, then again magnify to max on liveview and focus until it is the smallest possible dot on your liveview. Then slew back to the moon
Taking things a step further, you can get a Hartmanns' or Bhatinov mask, use those as focusing aids (works only on bright stars), lock the focus then re-slew back to the moon.
Micro-focusers are nice but I've found that simply brushing the focuser with your fingers instead of gripping it often produces a good result when trying to fine-focus. Of course this requires a little bit of finger dexterity :)
DON'T PANIC
User avatar
kaomoo
Posts: 149
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 10:49 am
Location: Pasir Panjang

Post by kaomoo »

I need an opinion. I am checking out micro focuser.
Between a Williams Optic 2" DDG SCT Focuser and a Starlight feathertouch SCT microfocuser (they are going for nearly similar price), what would you go for?
User avatar
orly_andico
Posts: 1616
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:14 pm
Location: Braddell Heights
Contact:

Post by orly_andico »

I'd go with the Williams.

Here's the thing - the Starlight focuser is basically a 10:1 reduction that goes onto your existing focus knob, which moves the mirror in and out. i.e. it adds a gear-down for fine focus but the focusing mechanism is still the same and you still have to deal with mirror flop.

mirror flop is quite large, you can drive Jupiter off the edge of a small (Toucam) imaging chip just with the flop.

whereas the Williams crayford is a completely separate focusing system that doesn't move the mirror at all, hence no flop. The only side-effect is that it reduces the back-focus quite a lot (since it is long) so you have to rack the built-in focuser in quite a bit which lengthens the focal ratio to around f/11 (from f/10).

Personally I went for the crayford (non DDG) because mirror flop at high mags drives me crazy.
Post Reply