New WO 72mm Megrez !!!

Here is the place to talk about all those equipment(Telescope, Mounts, Eyepieces, etc...) you have. Not sure which scope/eyepiece is best for you? Trash it out here!
User avatar
MooEy
Posts: 1275
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2003 6:24 am

Post by MooEy »

eh, actually i rather have a shorter tube like ur's wor. can play with binoviewer. my initial solution to my tube too long is to stick with televues/tak, since they usually need to be racked out more. happens to reach focus with a 2" diagonal with 1cm left. but then i managed to get one of those sexy tak 1.25" diagonal, so problem solved.

back to ur prob, extension tube + flattener + focuser racked out. ur focuser have any flex under those conditions? balance prolly can be solved by adding weight to front of tube, but flex is tricky.

~MooEy~
User avatar
Tachyon
Posts: 2038
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 11:40 am
Location: Bedok

Post by Tachyon »

I wonder how much McGill is selling?
[80% Steve, 20% Alfred] ------- Probability of Clear Skies = (Age of newest equipment in days) / [(Number of observers) * (Total Aperture of all telescopes present in mm)]
User avatar
MooEy
Posts: 1275
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2003 6:24 am

Post by MooEy »

...not u too. trying to get the guinness world record for owning the most amt of scopes?

~MooEy~
User avatar
ariefm71
Posts: 2304
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:15 pm
Location: bedok

Post by ariefm71 »

then i managed to get one of those sexy tak 1.25" diagonal, so problem solved.
The tak diagonal is nice, but sexy??? u shudn't do astro too much, observe the other "heavenly bodies" more liao :D :D

If the 72mm is equal to 80ED in term of performance (at least lunar, jupiter, and saturn), i'd be very interested. Any opinions?
User avatar
MooEy
Posts: 1275
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2003 6:24 am

Post by MooEy »

haha, it's sexy, people tend to molest it. 72 vs 80 wor, every mm here's counts leh. but in terms of money, the 72 might be very much cheaper.

~MooEy~
User avatar
Meng Lee
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:36 pm
Location: NTU, Woodlands

Post by Meng Lee »

Don't forget the carrying bag for Megrez 72mm looks like the Ferrari one!

Oh is the SMC coating the Pentax coating??
User avatar
MooEy
Posts: 1275
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2003 6:24 am

Post by MooEy »

eh, at the rate WO is doing their marketing, i think very soon alot people will go after them. stm is prolly their best coatings. smc, i wonder if pentax will jump on them.

~MooEy~
User avatar
Meng Lee
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:36 pm
Location: NTU, Woodlands

Post by Meng Lee »

Oh by the way, for the Megrez 80mm, I tightened the focuser quite a lot, so there is no flex and no slip under the extension tube+ flattener+DSLR load, so the coarse knob is not really smooth, but the fine knob is still very smooth.
User avatar
hommel
Posts: 317
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 1:36 pm
Location: Upp Serangoon/Tampines
Contact:

Post by hommel »

Meng Lee wrote:Don't forget the carrying bag for Megrez 72mm looks like the Ferrari one!

Oh is the SMC coating the Pentax coating??
I think the bag is an optional purchase as mentioned in the cloudynights forum.

So when you'll buy this baby and let go your 80mm? :lol:
User avatar
ariefm71
Posts: 2304
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:15 pm
Location: bedok

Post by ariefm71 »

I just ordered one from Anthony.

I had a Tak FC76 that I traded for an MN76. Although the MN76 blows the FC76 out of the water in term of performance, I still missed the finesse and portability of the Tak. The 72FD provides much better portability compared to the Tak, hopefully it doesn't lose much in performance (if it does, i'd consider a swap for owners of 80FD that want to downgrade :lol: :lol: ).

Arief
Post Reply