The Flame & Horse

CCD vs Film? Lots of time vs no patience? Alright, this is your place to discuss all the astrophotography what's and what's not. You can discuss about techniques, accessories, cameras, whatever....just make sure you also post some nice photos here too!
User avatar
cataclysm
Posts: 1024
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:23 pm

The Flame & Horse

Post by cataclysm »

These are tough objects to image under our light polluted skies. The contrast of the Horse head against the sky background is low that it is almost at the threshold of bringing out any details. My 1st attempt on 16 Nov ended without much success with a total imaging time of about 1 hour. Once after subtracting the background glow, what was left of the final image had so little data that it hardly formed a decent image.
A second imaging session was done on 21 Nov,and with the additional data from the earlier attempt, I was just able to obtain a more favourable signal to noise ratio.Even with the total imaging time of slightly more than 2 hour, I am still stretching the final image quite a fair bit to enhance the colours & details.
A total of 80 subframes were capture with TV Genesis SDF, Canon 350 and LPR filter.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
weixing
Super Moderator
Posts: 4708
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster

Post by weixing »

Hi,
WOW!!! Nice.... I always want to image horse head nebula in Singapore... now I know it is possible... :D

BY the way, what is the exposure time of a sub frame??

Have a nice day.
Yang Weixing
:mrgreen: "The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance." :mrgreen:
User avatar
acc
Administrator
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 11:15 pm
Favourite scope: Mag1 Instruments 12.5" Portaball

Post by acc »

Wow congrats! :)
We do it in the dark...
Portaball 12.5"
Takahashi Mewlon 210
William Optics 110ED
...and all night long!
perseid
Vendor
Posts: 207
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 2:20 pm
Contact:

Post by perseid »

Great to know that even in Singapore, you can get great deep sky images.

Looking at the effort you have put in to get the image, I think you should seriously think of getting your hand on the items below.
1) A used Canon 300D and remove the internal filter. The original filter blocks off 80% at Ha wavelength. It will save you a lot of imaging time to get the same result you are getting now. A used 300D probably costs less than SGD800.

2) A narrowband H-a filter. A 10nm bandpass would be best for your current setup.

Just my 2 cents.

Hope to see more images from you soon.
User avatar
ariefm71
Posts: 2304
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:15 pm
Location: bedok

Post by ariefm71 »

Very nice!
User avatar
Tachyon
Posts: 2038
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 11:40 am
Location: Bedok

Post by Tachyon »

Wow! Your persistence finally paid off!
[80% Steve, 20% Alfred] ------- Probability of Clear Skies = (Age of newest equipment in days) / [(Number of observers) * (Total Aperture of all telescopes present in mm)]
User avatar
wucheeyiun
Posts: 1758
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: marine parade
Contact:

Post by wucheeyiun »

really good effort...great job :)
i am impressed...
User avatar
cataclysm
Posts: 1024
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:23 pm

Post by cataclysm »

BY the way, what is the exposure time of a sub frame??
Hi weixing, the subframes were not evenly timed. I was using standard remote switch without timer. So I aga aga la. Most of the exposures ranged between 120s to 200s at ISO800. I experimented, and realised that exposure beyond 200s have diminishing returns. The skyglow is so bad that longer exposure will only clouded over the entire picture. I am still trying out the right mix between exposure and ISO.
User avatar
cataclysm
Posts: 1024
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:23 pm

Post by cataclysm »

used Canon 300D and remove the internal filter. The original filter blocks off 80% at Ha wavelength. It will save you a lot of imaging time to get the same result you are getting now. A used 300D probably costs less than SGD800.

2) A narrowband H-a filter. A 10nm bandpass would be best for your current setup
Hi Perside, thanks for the info.
User avatar
mrngbss
Posts: 900
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 8:27 am
Location: Bishan
Contact:

Post by mrngbss »

wow.... people say the horsehead is one of the most challenging to capture, you did it using a DLSR too! cheers!
Wee Nghee the Pooh
Post Reply