Bennett 1

CCD vs Film? Lots of time vs no patience? Alright, this is your place to discuss all the astrophotography what's and what's not. You can discuss about techniques, accessories, cameras, whatever....just make sure you also post some nice photos here too!
Post Reply
User avatar
rcj
Vendor
Posts: 3043
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Katong
Contact:

Bennett 1

Post by rcj »

Here's a rather strange object in Sculptor, termed Bennett 1 from the Jack Bennett catalogue of southern objects. Similar to Charles Messier's motivations, Jack Bennett was a comet hunter from South Africa and compiled a list of southern 'fuzzy' objects, with Bennett 1 as the first entry, otherwise also known as NGC55. This galaxy is actually an barred spiral viewed edge-on, and about 5 million LY distant. It is extremely dim and was hardly viewable even on focus mode, so this is just a curious attempt to see "what's there" from the local balcony. It looks like a pencil!

Luminance: 55 minutes

Image
Photon Bucket
http://www.celestialportraits.com
Facebook page: celestialportraits
User avatar
Airconvent
Super Moderator
Posts: 5804
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: United Federation of the Planets

Post by Airconvent »

yup..that's faint Remus. Don't think I would be able to see it visually on an 8" in Mersing! Thanks for sharing.. :D
The Boldly Go Where No Meade Has Gone Before
Captain, RSS Enterprise NCC1701R
United Federation of the Planets
User avatar
mrngbss
Posts: 900
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 8:27 am
Location: Bishan
Contact:

Post by mrngbss »

When you said the object is very dim to focus, is your gain settings set to a high setting already? Or it is still around the usual default settings? During focus mode, does the view brighten up a lot. Then when you are ready to take pictures, the view darkens back?
Wee Nghee the Pooh
User avatar
jiahao1986
Posts: 474
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 10:59 pm
Location: Clementi

Post by jiahao1986 »

Great shot!!!!

This galaxy is also easy and very beautiful visually. Last time in Mersing I and Alfred viewed it through a C9.25, extremely impressive! To me it's even better than NGC253!
Clear skies please...
User avatar
rcj
Vendor
Posts: 3043
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Katong
Contact:

Post by rcj »

It was dim in the sense that i could hardly make out the profile of the galaxy on focus preview mode, unlike ngc253. Atlases list it having a surface magnitude brightness ranging from 8.4 to 10. But i think it was especially harder from my balcony because it was "sat" right in the heart of a specific light pollution dome in the south... during focus preview, my settings are usually default, and dynamic range set to auto...it will stretch where needed. I am not sure what you mean by going dark when taking...but i cannot see the exposure until once it is finished. Even so, the stretch is auto, but by then, the profile of the galaxy is easily seen. So as such, when it comes to taking objects like this, or faint RCW nebulae, the trick is to make sure you know where you are star hopping to, and this is where you will need good databases such as The Sky6. Uranometria is not enough. Have not tried millenium though. Another great help would be to always have a reference image in the same laptop, so that you can compare star fields, and it will be a sign to indicate where your focus mode region is.
Photon Bucket
http://www.celestialportraits.com
Facebook page: celestialportraits
User avatar
mrngbss
Posts: 900
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 8:27 am
Location: Bishan
Contact:

Post by mrngbss »

I see thanks!
Wee Nghee the Pooh
Post Reply