Hi,
If you have experience on the above Canon lens, please PM off list. Thanks!
Canon 70-200 f2.8L
- weixing
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 4708
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
- Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
- Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster
Hi,
Anyway, isn't 70-200mm too long for travel photography?? 24-70mm or 24-105mm may be a better choice for travel photography.
Just my S$0.02.
Have a nice day.
The 2.8L is quite heavy... may be too heavy for travel photography. May be you can look at the F4 version... only one stop slower, but lighter and cheaper.wish to use it for travel photography... saw one physically from a clubsnap member....he wants to sell it for 2500.
Anyway, isn't 70-200mm too long for travel photography?? 24-70mm or 24-105mm may be a better choice for travel photography.
Just my S$0.02.
Have a nice day.
Yang Weixing
"The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance." 


yes weixing, i did see the f4 version as well but the f2.8 is more enticing. it would be a mix of close up distant shots and portrait and seeing the the above lens before, it is not a problem (carried a 300mm before to Oz and US). the 24-105 is good, but it covers part of the range of the existing lens.
- Clifford60
- Posts: 1289
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:41 pm
- Location: Central
$2500 should be for the IS version. The 70-200 2.8 w/o is is going for about $1300 to $1500.rcj wrote:wish to use it for travel photography... saw one physically from a clubsnap member....he wants to sell it for 2500.
With or without IS the lens is rather heavy. The f4 is very much lighter and easier to handle.
Swim or Sink