Jupiter Imaging

CCD vs Film? Lots of time vs no patience? Alright, this is your place to discuss all the astrophotography what's and what's not. You can discuss about techniques, accessories, cameras, whatever....just make sure you also post some nice photos here too!
Post Reply
User avatar
boothee
Posts: 499
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 5:38 pm
Location: Myanmar

Jupiter Imaging

Post by boothee »

Hi

What would be the maximum duration for capturing Jupiter?

Thanks for your help & looking forward for your reply.

Clear Skies!

:)
boothee
1150mm, 254mm, Newtonion Reflector on EQ5 Mount with dual axis DK3 drive, QHY5 Camera, Canon 300D + Kit Lens, Yangon, Myanmar.
User avatar
JY
Posts: 203
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 8:19 am
Location: Yio Chu Kang
Contact:

Post by JY »

Hi Boothee,

I would say 90 seconds.

See below an animation I did last week while I was wondering the same thing ...

Each image is a stack of 90 seconds AVI.
I took two AVI taken back to back so the short move shows the rotation over 90 seconds.

Then there is about 30 minutes between two big moves

Cheers

JY

Image
User avatar
boothee
Posts: 499
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 5:38 pm
Location: Myanmar

Post by boothee »

Hi,

Thanks for your reply. Nice animation.

Cheers!

:)
boothee
1150mm, 254mm, Newtonion Reflector on EQ5 Mount with dual axis DK3 drive, QHY5 Camera, Canon 300D + Kit Lens, Yangon, Myanmar.
User avatar
rcj
Vendor
Posts: 3043
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Katong
Contact:

Post by rcj »

Hi Boothee,

Depending on whether you are doing filtered exposures (AVI capture) or single shot imaging, and also how much you time you need to take to change filters for the first approach. In my experience through filtered exposures, each AVI per primary colour channel takes about 35seconds optimal for my current system (8" F31). I have tried 40 seconds which is what others have adviced but found it to yield considerable field rotation, added to the fact that the manual filter wheel has to be rotated for each colour channel. The time taken for wheel rotation takes up around 2-3 seconds, so i figured it would be better to restrict AVI exposure per channel to about 35 seconds (and again, I would stress for my system). Depending on the effective focal ratio of your system, the exposure duration varies slightly. More importantly, as long as you can obtain at least 1000 frames cumulative per colour channel, it would be a good enough basis for reduction selection under Registax.
Now, the picture changes if you are using a single shot colour camera (Toucam, etc), since there is no need to take time to change filters, you can expose Jupiter longer. As JY has mentioned, 90 seconds is a good rule of thumb, but it is worth exploring based on your system. I have a formula worked out on my website article (accessible from www.celestialportraits.com) to derive the recommended exposure duration for single shot cameras.

Do take note that out of a certain N number of frames gathered from an AVI, it is best to take M number of frames (M<N) from this set based on the Gradient selection alignment method in Registax. Also, it is better to have a few very good frames for stacking rather than to stack everything together in large numbers. You will very often retain critical surface details better thereafter.
Photon Bucket
http://www.celestialportraits.com
Facebook page: celestialportraits
User avatar
boothee
Posts: 499
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 5:38 pm
Location: Myanmar

Post by boothee »

Hello Remus,

Thank you so much for your kind explanation. I think 90seconds maximum for me as I'm using QHY5 Color Camera and not capturing with filters.

Bad thing is my camera can capture only about around 900 (400x400) pictures in 90 seconds and of course there are many dropped frames due to the atmospheric turbulence.

Anyway, thank you for your help. :)

Clear Skies!

boothee
1150mm, 254mm, Newtonion Reflector on EQ5 Mount with dual axis DK3 drive, QHY5 Camera, Canon 300D + Kit Lens, Yangon, Myanmar.
Post Reply