CCD vs Film? Lots of time vs no patience? Alright, this is your place to discuss all the astrophotography what's and what's not. You can discuss about techniques, accessories, cameras, whatever....just make sure you also post some nice photos here too!
I took this moon photo with my workhorse a 5inch f4
this time I did not convert to monochromatic image for the moon contains distinct tone of varying hues due to the presence of minerals and variations in geological age formation.
So here I have carried out some colour enhancement to the moon by increasing the saturation of the image using the "Hue and Saturation " tool of Photoshop
WOW. a bit overcook.
Any chemist or geologist that can decipher what minerals by the colour?
Not very good at astro photo myelf but here is an old moon photo taken using a Pentax K100D + Sigma 600mm mirror lens during one of those rare "enthusiatic" moments..
The Boldly Go Where No Meade Has Gone Before Captain, RSS Enterprise NCC1701R United Federation of the Planets
Iron absorbs light preferentially around 1000 nm while titanium absorbs preferentially at around 415 nm. Thus both maturation and mafic composite ratio images will show strong iron based mafic signatures as being greenish. Mafic materials with high titanium content (like clinopyroxene or ilmenite) will appear bluish on a mafic composite ratio image. Low titanium pyroxenes such as orthopyroxene (like norite) will appear reddish, violet or purplish on a mafic composite ratio image. Ancient exposed lunar surfaces can also be differentiated from more recently created surface features based upon their increased concentration of glasses as a consequence of long term micrometeorite bombardment. Such surfaces appear reddish or orange red on maturation composite ratio images. Pyroclastic flows containing orange glasses appear deep red on maturation composite ratio images.
Cheers, Ken
Snake Valley, Australia President: Snake Valley Astronomical Association