Beginner pics!

CCD vs Film? Lots of time vs no patience? Alright, this is your place to discuss all the astrophotography what's and what's not. You can discuss about techniques, accessories, cameras, whatever....just make sure you also post some nice photos here too!
ebeyonder
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 6:52 am

Beginner pics!

Post by ebeyonder »

Hi all,

Tonight is the second time I did some imaging with the equipment I have collected. I imaged the pics from Cambridge, Massachusetts in the US. Any comments and suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I hope to learn as much as I can here so that when I return to Singapore later this year I can carry on where I left off! :)

I imaged M31 - about 20 images of about 300 sec exposures (or maybe 200 sec, cannot recall). I did the dark and light frames too. This was the best I could do with Photoshop:

Image

Another version:

Image

I am not sure why my image looks a bit grey? Or is this the normal colour? I shot everything in RAW this time.

I then tried to take M42 before it set. I only had a limited time because M42 is visible only for a short time from my balcony. I managed to catch it as it was setting behind some trees:

Image

This is a single 30 sec shot.

I tried taking multiple shots, but the branch got in the way and combining the images gave a weird shadow where the branch is.

A crop of the shot above:

Image

One thing I realise is that in the shots above, I can see tiny arrays... what are these, and how do I get rid of them?

Again, thanks for all your help... any comments and suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
User avatar
rcj
Vendor
Posts: 3041
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Katong
Contact:

Post by rcj »

good attempts on M31! however somehow the last two pictures don't seem to load, am interested to know what u mean by arrays?
Photon Bucket
http://www.celestialportraits.com
Facebook page: celestialportraits
User avatar
weixing
Super Moderator
Posts: 4708
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster

Re: Beginner pics!

Post by weixing »

Hi,
ebeyonder wrote: I imaged M31 - about 20 images of about 300 sec exposures (or maybe 200 sec, cannot recall).
Check your RAW files lor... it had the exposure time in it.
ebeyonder wrote: One thing I realise is that in the shots above, I can see tiny arrays... what are these, and how do I get rid of them?
Might be cause by the way you do the image processing. What camera did you use??

Anyway, the M31 was nice... way beter than my first DSO image... :)

Happy imaging and have a nice day.
Yang Weixing
:mrgreen: "The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance." :mrgreen:
User avatar
yybmage
Posts: 112
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:16 pm

Post by yybmage »

Wow!! Good control over your exposure and good job for the stacking!
Blast off!!!!!!!
User avatar
Bergkamp_
Posts: 1562
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 11:31 pm
Favourite scope: Telescope that i can bring out
Location: Singapore, Bukit Panjang

Post by Bergkamp_ »

nice! very gd for starting..
Wee Ern aRmeD wiF Telescope reAdY tO taKe ovEr thE skY .. wIF jUst mY naKed eYEs .
ebeyonder
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 6:52 am

Post by ebeyonder »

Thanks for all the encouraging replies :)

By arrays I mean squarish things that appear. And these aren't just isolated specks like hot pixels or the like; these are repeated patterns, like those on a checkered shirt...

And also I used a Orion Starshoot Pro v2, taken with the included DL Maxim essentials, processed with Photoshop.
User avatar
rcj
Vendor
Posts: 3041
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Katong
Contact:

Post by rcj »

am able to see the pictures now....i see what u mean...yes, those are attributed to hot and cold pixel artifacts. Did u utilize any algorithm to remove the hot and cold pixels? If yes, at which part of the reduction process? It would be best to remove these pixels after doing dark and flat frame subtraction PER SUB-EXPOSURE separately, rather than removing it at the combined result. This is my guess though, cause I had similar artifacts before until the removal process was implemented per sub level.
Photon Bucket
http://www.celestialportraits.com
Facebook page: celestialportraits
User avatar
Airconvent
Super Moderator
Posts: 5792
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: United Federation of the Planets

Post by Airconvent »

Very good first effort ebeyonder! [smilie=cool.gif]
The Boldly Go Where No Meade Has Gone Before
Captain, RSS Enterprise NCC1701R
United Federation of the Planets
ebeyonder
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 6:52 am

Post by ebeyonder »

Remus, by removal of hot and cold pixels, do you mean the light and dark frame thing? If so, I did it for each sub-exposure before stacking them together...
User avatar
rcj
Vendor
Posts: 3041
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Katong
Contact:

Post by rcj »

Yihan,

The reduction process is a standard procedure for the preparation of images for eventual post processing and is followed by:

1) Dark frame subtraction from the Light frame
2) Flat frame subtraction from the dark-subtracted Light frame
3) Removal of hot/cold pixels from the flat-dark-subtracted Light frame - a.k.a Reduced frame.

only after step 3, is the resultant Reduced frame ready for stacking (combining).
Photon Bucket
http://www.celestialportraits.com
Facebook page: celestialportraits
Post Reply