comet Ephemeris

Got a question on astronomy that you'd wanted to ask? Ask your questions here and see if the old timers can give you some good answers.
Post Reply
User avatar
fizzy123
Posts: 680
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2004 12:47 pm
Location: Tampines

comet Ephemeris

Post by fizzy123 »

Hmmmm.... Does anyone know how to read it. The dates and position of comets are based on the position of which place wat Universal Time (UT). Etc. NASA Jet Propulsion Lab
User avatar
rcj
Vendor
Posts: 3043
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Katong
Contact:

Post by rcj »

Are you incidently referring to something like this:
http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/Ephemeri ... 002T7.html
which is the ephemeris for T7?
It is pretty straight forward as you just need to refer to the date of observation, take note of the RA and DEC coordinates. Ignore the magnitude estimates as they are currently inaccurate. However, my usual mode of tracking down the position of any given comet is by loading the emphemeris information into my planetarium software and the rest of the positional statistic is done by the software.
User avatar
fizzy123
Posts: 680
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2004 12:47 pm
Location: Tampines

Post by fizzy123 »

But a problem is, etc a comet is at tis R.A. and DEC at a particular date, does that mean that the comet will be at that position for the whole night? Wouldn't it change position with different time in the night? NASA is located in U.S. wouldn't the date they give be at least a few hours behind us. :shock: :roll: :roll: :wink:
User avatar
rcj
Vendor
Posts: 3043
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Katong
Contact:

Post by rcj »

That's why I mentioned using software for reliance. But frankly, even with the change in RA&DEC for a given date, the change is small relative to the visibility of the comet (unless you are talking about seeing mag 10-12 or dimmer comets), and the given RA and DEC is enough to spot a mag 4 comet. i have used both software and manual (RA&DEC plotted position on my atlas) methods for comet hunting both now and in the past, and it has worked well so far.
Post Reply