CCD vs Film? Lots of time vs no patience? Alright, this is your place to discuss all the astrophotography what's and what's not. You can discuss about techniques, accessories, cameras, whatever....just make sure you also post some nice photos here too!
I have a bit of trouble with using Registax 3 to process images. According to the web site, Registax 3's strength suppossedly lies in its ability to do wavelet processing. However, I dont seem to be able to make any sense of the graphs and settings .
Could anyone please enlighten me on this? Thank you
Hi,
At every wavelet layer, there is a preview button. Click on the preview button, the software will display a enchance map. The enchance map will show you which pixels will be enchance when you change that setting. Just change the setting until you like what you see.
Have a nice day.
Yang Weixing "The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance."
The scope was a 8-inch SCT and the mount was a Vixen Sphinx mount. I seem to have some problem focusing when taking the image. Yes, I also agree fully that it lacks detail.
The camera used was a Nikon Coolpix 4500 on movie (.avi) mode. Would better results be achieved with a ToUcam?
Thank you
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
I can't remember the exact dimensions of the movie when recorded, but it was about 320X240 when I opened it in Registax after converting it from .mov format to .avi format using Quicktime Pro.
Could it be due to the weather and high-altitude cloud that gave rise to the lack of detail? I think the focusing was not done well enough.
Hope that I won't get sore eyes on the eve of another big astronomy event and miss out on it again .