M17

CCD vs Film? Lots of time vs no patience? Alright, this is your place to discuss all the astrophotography what's and what's not. You can discuss about techniques, accessories, cameras, whatever....just make sure you also post some nice photos here too!
Post Reply
User avatar
cataclysm
Posts: 1024
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:23 pm

M17

Post by cataclysm »

Just processed this picture taken on 7 July with the cooled camera set up. The result is more than i can ask for. I was able to pushed to 1600 ISO for 8 minutes sub with tolerable heat signatures. The significant improvement was it require shoter overall integration time to yield the same results.

Genesis SDF
Canon 350D (Mod)
3x8minutes ISO1600 with Halpha filter
10x5minutes ISO1600 with OIII filter
Dark,Flat,Bias calibrated with ImagesPlus


Image
User avatar
raychan
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 10:18 am
Location: Hillview

Post by raychan »

Wow......at 1600 ISO, this is great. You can hardly see any noise at this size unless you blow it up to full res.

Think you should patent your camera cooler !!

Two thumbs up !!
User avatar
weixing
Super Moderator
Posts: 4708
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster

Post by weixing »

Hi,
Nice image... :D :D

Have a nice day.
Yang Weixing
:mrgreen: "The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance." :mrgreen:
User avatar
Meng Lee
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:36 pm
Location: NTU, Woodlands

Post by Meng Lee »

Erm, don't set the black point too low. Some data is lost. Try making the dim regions of the nebula come out by using curves, or DDP or SMI.

If you set the low black point to get rid of the skyglow or gradient, then you lose the data on the dim parts of the nebula. Use a flat frame then remove the gradient.

I can see the picture has a great deal of information in it, but clipped. :)
User avatar
cataclysm
Posts: 1024
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:23 pm

Post by cataclysm »

I can see the picture has a great deal of information in it, but clipped.
Thanks Meng Lee, noted.
User avatar
rcj
Vendor
Posts: 3043
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Katong
Contact:

Post by rcj »

sorry for coming in late with this. it is definitely a marked improvement in performance for the additional cooling. Longer exposures per sub exposure is definitely the way to go where conditions allow. Notice that you took OIII as well. How did u integrate the OIII into the final result?

Cheers to a great image!
Photon Bucket
http://www.celestialportraits.com
Facebook page: celestialportraits
User avatar
cataclysm
Posts: 1024
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:23 pm

Post by cataclysm »

Notice that you took OIII as well. How did u integrate the OIII into the final result?
Hi Remus, the combination is HaHaOIII, Ha as luminance, Ha is used again as red channel, OIII as blue green Channel. Still experimenting with the right mix. as you can see, the colour is a bit off.
User avatar
rcj
Vendor
Posts: 3043
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Katong
Contact:

Post by rcj »

It is a bit but not too much. You might like to experiment with the following combination also:

R: Ha
B: OIII
G: OIII multiply with Ha

You can do this in photoshop. After that, one can fine tune the result via Hue/Saturation slider to suit your taste.
Photon Bucket
http://www.celestialportraits.com
Facebook page: celestialportraits
Post Reply