CCD vs Film? Lots of time vs no patience? Alright, this is your place to discuss all the astrophotography what's and what's not. You can discuss about techniques, accessories, cameras, whatever....just make sure you also post some nice photos here too!
Just processed this picture taken on 7 July with the cooled camera set up. The result is more than i can ask for. I was able to pushed to 1600 ISO for 8 minutes sub with tolerable heat signatures. The significant improvement was it require shoter overall integration time to yield the same results.
Genesis SDF
Canon 350D (Mod)
3x8minutes ISO1600 with Halpha filter
10x5minutes ISO1600 with OIII filter
Dark,Flat,Bias calibrated with ImagesPlus
Erm, don't set the black point too low. Some data is lost. Try making the dim regions of the nebula come out by using curves, or DDP or SMI.
If you set the low black point to get rid of the skyglow or gradient, then you lose the data on the dim parts of the nebula. Use a flat frame then remove the gradient.
I can see the picture has a great deal of information in it, but clipped.
sorry for coming in late with this. it is definitely a marked improvement in performance for the additional cooling. Longer exposures per sub exposure is definitely the way to go where conditions allow. Notice that you took OIII as well. How did u integrate the OIII into the final result?
Notice that you took OIII as well. How did u integrate the OIII into the final result?
Hi Remus, the combination is HaHaOIII, Ha as luminance, Ha is used again as red channel, OIII as blue green Channel. Still experimenting with the right mix. as you can see, the colour is a bit off.